|
|
|
|
|
 |
文章評論 |
 |
|
|
作者:山梓 |
|
留言時間:2010-04-08 21:08:02 |
|
|
各位最新訪客,恕我不能一一回復,這裡一併謝過。 歡迎各位借我的小山莊各抒己見,討論爭辯。這裡只是希望大家相互尊重,平心靜氣,共同享受博客的樂趣。 |
|
|
|
作者:八零後 |
|
留言時間:2010-04-08 18:16:27 |
|
|
吃狗肉很好解釋:
我平時對他們說:以前中國很多地方,尤其是北方農業不好的地方,很多人靠狩獵。他們沒有畜牧業。因此狗變成一種肉食是很自然的。他們會圈養一些狗(這本來也就是事實)。 現在的社會本身也是一個國際化的社會。雖然很多人不能理解別國的情景,不過這樣的人本身就和我成為不了關係很鐵的朋友,我也無所謂。也和我的個性有關係。 |
|
|
|
從文中看到作者的民族自卑外,我還真沒有看出什麼其它的來。 文化不同有啥大驚小怪的,法國人吃田雞和蝸牛,德國人就看不慣;但是德國人吃生牛肉,法國人也覺得噁心。但是從來沒有看到過他們之間非要解釋給對方不可。 你那同事問你這些問題本來就是有一種居高臨下的味道在其中,你那又是“小心翼翼”地回答他 -- 一副洋奴像! |
|
|
|
作者:瀟石 |
|
留言時間:2010-04-08 14:29:18 |
|
|
西岸說的有些道理。但西岸老把自已看成”受虐者“或文化劣勢者,就屬太沒自信。我小孩都問我這些問題啦,該不會他們搞的文化優勢吧?有些中國人是太脆弱和神經過敏。我是贊成計劃生育的,只是方法上國內搞的不好。世界人口減10倍,把社會和科技都搞好,會有很好的生活。人不是動物,不能非把地球表面不擠滿不罷休。 mustaphak 和 brush 倆位黨員的覺悟就比大家就高,不是只膚淺地看到其”文化優勢“而嗅出了美國這個國家在搞文化侵略,干涉”內政“! ”一鳴“小朋友不宜來這地方,不利於你的成長的。你多讀讀人民日報,會比來這又益的多。 |
|
|
|
作者:PH |
|
留言時間:2010-04-08 13:55:18 |
|
|
"tree38 留言時間:2010-04-08 09:11:44 I am a math teacher. After telling my students to determine by themselves the doubling periods of the Chinese population, which is about 35 years before the "one child per family" policy and 61 years after, I ask them if they have a second thought about the policy. First, they are frightened by the rapid growing rate. Secondly, they think that policy is the best thing that the Chinese have ever done to world since the beginning of the mankind history "
Do the following math: If Chinese hold the one child policy steady, how many years it takes for Chinese population to drop to half of the peak value? How years to drop to 10 million or 1 million?
It is not only a math problem. The child policy also creates social problems. That is why I support birth control,but I think the goevernment has done it over. |
|
|
|
作者:西岸 |
|
留言時間:2010-04-08 13:01:24 |
|
|
這兩件事都遇到過,沒覺得有什麼難解釋的。 吃狗肉問題更多是關於韓國人,不是中國人。簡單的解釋就是那是farmed animal,就是中文所說的“菜狗”,與這裡養的牛沒什麼區別。 你到野外打野牛可能犯法,但殺掉圈養的牛賣肉就是商業行為。 似乎沒見過什麼人不理解。 另外美國人不是現在也大量吃豬肉了?過去可是只是下等的南方人才吃。在東部的時候曾經見過有老美形容中國店裡有豬腸子賣,當然是個貶義的意思。問她去過西班牙沒有?地中海國家的集市上豬下水產品比比皆是,根本不是中國人能比的。
計劃生育,更簡單的解釋就是,中國不是獨裁政府嗎?政府下令人們可能反對可能支持,都有理由。美國當年蓄奴不是也有支持也有反對的?但有誰敢不從?都是從資源消耗和利用考慮。歷史階段罷了。弄出20億人口來為了那點耕地資源天天打內戰或擴張,美國的東西賣給誰?
這種東西是典型的“文化優勢”的玩意,超出了好奇的範圍。 |
|
|
|
作者:人大代表 |
|
留言時間:2010-04-08 12:31:09 |
|
|
看憤老 MustaphaK 的留言哭笑不得。動物的本能反應在她身上還很強呢,開口不去講理,馬上井噴“我屁股有屎,你屁股也不香!”。 再者滿腦子人民日報!世界上“厭恨”美國的也基本上就是些欺壓老百姓的獨裁者和你們這些狗腿子們,還有些就是被信息隔離和欺矇的少數人們。“殺人最多”應該改為“殺壞人最多”,那是好事!殺日本鬼子,德國鬼子,侵科的共和國衛隊。。。美國有不少缺點,但無疑是世界上最光明磊落,最有責任感,最勇於進取,也是對世界發展貢獻最大的國家。 這是世界人民為之高興,反動派及其走狗為之又恨又怕! |
|
|
|
作者:headbig |
|
留言時間:2010-04-08 10:16:19 |
|
|
Unbelievable, so many support "自我閹割"
大陸的中國人是世界上唯一自我閹割的民族。" |
|
|
|
作者:tree38 |
|
留言時間:2010-04-08 09:11:44 |
|
|
I am a math teacher. After telling my students to determine by themselves the doubling periods of the Chinese population, which is about 35 years before the "one child per family" policy and 61 years after, I ask them if they have a second thought about the policy. First, they are frightened by the rapid growing rate. Secondly, they think that policy is the best thing that the Chinese have ever done to world since the beginning of the mankind history |
|
|
|
作者:PH |
|
留言時間:2010-04-08 08:40:24 |
|
|
MustaphaK,
Have a nice day! |
|
|
|
作者:MustaphaK |
|
留言時間:2010-04-08 08:16:23 |
|
|
Dear PH,
Once again you have too high an "opinion" on your own ability to "irritate". Please try harder. You are not registering yet. :) |
|
|
|
作者:PH |
|
留言時間:2010-04-08 08:13:17 |
|
|
Daer MustaphaK,
I am glad that I can get you irritated! Enjoy! |
|
|
|
作者:MustaphaK |
|
留言時間:2010-04-08 08:11:14 |
|
|
You really need to check your PH level, my dear PH, because "scientifically" speaking, it is "observed" that your PH is low and you are turning acidic. :) |
|
|
|
作者:MustaphaK |
|
留言時間:2010-04-08 08:07:24 |
|
|
"MustaphaK 留言時間:2010-04-08 07:50:31 Dear PH,
This is a crappy Blog as far away from a "scientific discussion" as you can ever get. So please, don't get carried away with you "observations and analysis" which is no more valuable than any baseless casual remarks.
As for your "close friend who worked on birth control in China." . Well this friend of yours can count himself lucky, because if he ever tries to pull this shit in America, he'd be shot. :) "
"Basically, you have proven that you have no brain at all."
Oh yes, this other "opinion" of yours is once again, based upon your very "scientific" "observations and analysis", obviously. :) Check out the big dog-meat brains on PH. :)"
"I am glad you start to think. A sign of brain development. Very fast evolution for your species."
Oh really? My dear PH, you really are capable of thinking that in that tiny-weeny pea-brain of yours?
Don't think too hard my friend, your brain is in melt-down, your heart rate is up and your nose is starting to bleed. :) |
|
|
|
作者:PH |
|
留言時間:2010-04-08 08:02:46 |
|
|
"MustaphaK 留言時間:2010-04-08 07:50:31 Dear PH,
This is a crappy Blog as far away from a "scientific discussion" as you can ever get. So please, don't get carried away with you "observations and analysis" which is no more valuable than any baseless casual remarks.
As for your "close friend who worked on birth control in China." . Well this friend of yours can count himself lucky, because if he ever tries to pull this shit in America, he'd be shot. :) "
"Basically, you have proven that you have no brain at all."
Oh yes, this other "opinion" of yours is once again, based upon your very "scientific" "observations and analysis", obviously. :) Check out the big dog-meat brains on PH. :)"
I am glad you start to think. A sign of brain development. Very fast evolution for your species. |
|
|
|
作者:MustaphaK |
|
留言時間:2010-04-08 07:56:55 |
|
|
"MustaphaK 留言時間:2010-04-08 07:50:31 Dear PH,
This is a crappy Blog as far away from a "scientific discussion" as you can ever get. So please, don't get carried away with you "observations and analysis" which is no more valuable than any baseless casual remarks.
As for your "close friend who worked on birth control in China." . Well this friend of yours can count himself lucky, because if he ever tries to pull this shit in America, he'd be shot. :) "
"Basically, you have proven that you have no brain at all."
Oh yes, this other "opinion" of yours is once again, based upon your very "scientific" "observations and analysis", obviously. :) Check out the big dog-meat brains on PH. :) |
|
|
|
作者:PH |
|
留言時間:2010-04-08 07:56:31 |
|
|
"崑崙山上一棵草 留言時間:2010-04-08 07:44:32 不同的民族有不同的習俗。美國人太以自我為中心,太矯情,所以不理解。其實可以以子之矛攻子之盾。西人吃牛肉,在印度人看來是野獸;西人也吃豬肉,在伊斯蘭看來更是不可思議。北方的愛斯基摩人吃海豹,那也是多麼通人性的動物。
我相信西方人的祖先也吃過狗肉。記得有個北極探險家就是靠狗肉生存下來的。不過忘了他們是哪個國家的人了。
狗肉也不是所有的中國人都吃。有相當大數量的中國人不肯吃狗肉。
狗,在中國還叫地羊,與羊同類。 '
Agree. It is just a matter of cultural difference. |
|
|
|
作者:崑崙山上一棵草 |
|
留言時間:2010-04-08 07:55:28 |
|
|
至於“計劃生育”,反對者也只看到問題,而沒看到其功績。一個家庭一個孩子,確實有點過分。我在80年代就有異議。但是,這不能否定計劃生育的意義。倒是可以說計劃生育搞得晚了,不得不矯枉過正。至於“強制”,沒有強制什麼移風易俗的事情都不可能見效。
實際上在農村一個孩子的政策基本上只是宣傳(除了文革期間),兩個孩子的家庭,甚至三個的也不少。
我看“一個家庭一個孩子”的政策應當改變了。在不變就可能又有些晚了。現在許多1970年代出生的人不要孩子。這是個危險現象。 |
|
|
|
作者:PH |
|
留言時間:2010-04-08 07:53:22 |
|
|
"MustaphaK 留言時間:2010-04-08 07:50:31 Dear PH,
This is a crappy Blog as far away from a "scientific discussion" as you can ever get. So please, don't get carried away with you "observations and analysis" which is no more valuable than any baseless casual remarks.
As for your "close friend who worked on birth control in China." . Well this friend of yours can count himself lucky, because if he ever tries to pull this shit in America, he'd be shot. :) "
Basically, you have proven that you have no brain at all. |
|
|
|
作者:MustaphaK |
|
留言時間:2010-04-08 07:50:31 |
|
|
Dear PH,
This is a crappy Blog as far away from a "scientific discussion" as you can ever get. So please, don't get carried away with you "observations and analysis" which is no more valuable than any baseless casual remarks.
As for your "close friend who worked on birth control in China." . Well this friend of yours can count himself lucky, because if he ever tries to pull this shit in America, he'd be shot. :) |
|
|
|
作者:崑崙山上一棵草 |
|
留言時間:2010-04-08 07:44:32 |
|
|
不同的民族有不同的習俗。美國人太以自我為中心,太矯情,所以不理解。其實可以以子之矛攻子之盾。西人吃牛肉,在印度人看來是野獸;西人也吃豬肉,在伊斯蘭看來更是不可思議。北方的愛斯基摩人吃海豹,那也是多麼通人性的動物。
我相信西方人的祖先也吃過狗肉。記得有個北極探險家就是靠狗肉生存下來的。不過忘了他們是哪個國家的人了。
狗肉也不是所有的中國人都吃。有相當大數量的中國人不肯吃狗肉。
狗,在中國還叫地羊,與羊同類。 |
|
|
|
作者:PH |
|
留言時間:2010-04-08 07:42:46 |
|
|
MustaphaK,
This is a scientific discussion. If you have any brain at all, we can discuss.
Actually, I have a close friend who worked on brith control in China. My opinion is based on our observations and analysis. |
|
|
|
作者:MustaphaK |
|
留言時間:2010-04-08 07:37:12 |
|
|
哇, PH, 還1,2 的, 你怎麼不去中國搞計劃生育啊? 可能那些鄉下人聽你一開英語,個個自動流產.
What a waste of your natural talent!? You birth control extraordinaire YOU!!
要不要吃些狗肉? |
|
|
|
作者:PH |
|
留言時間:2010-04-08 07:31:08 |
|
|
"至於計劃生育,只有一個關鍵實事:資源是有限的。如果資源無限,你隨便怎麼生。"
Brush,
I agree that birth control is necessary for China. The key is how to control. There are 2 problems in Chinese government's approach:
1. In any case, each family should be allowed to have 2 children to maintain the population stability. Manpower shortage will happen in China soon.
2. The government could have promoted birth control in ways other than force. |
|
|
|
作者:Silent |
|
留言時間:2010-04-08 07:25:25 |
|
|
"但是中國人口太多,這只能是沒有辦法的辦法。" 我同意PH的看法。我們認為這個是沒有辦法的辦法可能也僅僅是被“洗腦“的結果。。。。。。。。。 |
|
|
|
作者:MustaphaK |
|
留言時間:2010-04-08 07:24:50 |
|
|
水柔石剛 留言時間:2010-04-08 07:06:17 原來這樣,不同民族是有不同的文化呀。謝謝分享。
===== 哦, 原來你連“不同民族是有不同的文化”這個道理活到今天才知道?你一定是美國人了.因為世界上只有美國人才認為世界上除了美國人沒別的民族和文化了. |
|
|
|
作者:MustaphaK |
|
留言時間:2010-04-08 07:19:08 |
|
|
對啊, 美國人很難理解吃狗肉,但非常中意吃人肉. 不能理解打胎, 但很能理解殺人.
所以美國人不是人而是食肉的動物,所以很難理解人類的文化. |
|
|
|
作者:水柔石剛 |
|
留言時間:2010-04-08 07:06:17 |
|
|
|
作者:一鳴 |
|
留言時間:2010-04-08 06:51:51 |
|
|
無法理解就別理解,不是什麼事情都能理解的。
也可以問問美國人,伊拉克明明沒有生化武器,美國為啥要侵略他,殺死那麼多人?
殺人可比吃狗肉更讓人難理解。 |
|
|
|
作者:brush |
|
留言時間:2010-04-08 06:40:54 |
|
|
吃狗肉就和西方喜歡吃生肉,在中國看起來血淋淋的野獸一半,西方就喜歡。就如同西方把情人當作很正常的事,中國就比較反感一樣。
至於計劃生育,只有一個關鍵實事:資源是有限的。如果資源無限,你隨便怎麼生。如果是有限的,那麼,你多生的後代就要分薄其他少生的後代。如果人人平等,那麼每個人都有權力把自己的那部分資源留給後代。你占用了,既要補償。僅此而已。更不要說西方就是站着說話不腰疼。你只要問他,你的國家願不願意接受超生的人口?我們國家已經容納不下,如果你願意我們舉雙手贊同超生。明天就送他幾億人來。如果不願意,就不要裝聖人,你本來就是個偽君子。裝作同情別人不過是為了顯得自己多高尚。可惜您不是。要不然您也不會整天反對歧視移民了。 |
|
|
|
|