“丝丝”网友早些时候发了一篇题为《假博士，草包英文（BBC专访）》的博文。根据视频中蔡英文的某个发音问题，而断定蔡英文是“假博士”。例如她在评论区里说：
我不同意她的这种说法，在她的博文后发表了如下评论：
蔡的母校－The London School of Economics and Political Science已经发表声明证实蔡的博士学位，要尊重事实。蔡是法学博士，不是英国语言文学博士，个别字发音不准有什么奇怪啊？据此就说她是假博士、是人品问题，太过分了。反对蔡的政治立场没问题，但如果靠谣言来进行人身攻击，就是人品问题了。LSE的声明如下：
LSE statement on PhD of Dr. Tsai Ing-wen
LSE has received a number of queries regarding the academic status of our alumna, Dr Tsai Ing-wen, President of Taiwan. We can be clear the records of LSE and of the University of London -
the degree awarding body at the time - confirm that Dr Tsai was
correctly awarded a PhD in Law in 1984. All degrees from that period were awarded via the University of
London and the thesis would have been sent first to their Senate House
Library. The Senate House Library records confirm that a copy was received and
sent by them to the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies (IALS). There
is a listing of Dr Tsai’s thesis ‘Unfair trade practices and safeguard
actions’ in the IALS index document “Legal Research in the United
Kingdom 1905-1984”, which was published in 1985. Dr Tsai recently provided the LSE Library with a facsimile of a personal copy of the thesis, Unfair trade practices and safeguard actions
which is available to view in the Library Reading Room. We understand
Dr Tsai has also provided a digital version of her personal copy to the
National Central Library of Taiwan.
链接：http://www.lse.ac.uk/News/Latest-news-from-LSE/2019/j-October-2019/LSE-statement-on-PhD-of-Dr-Tsai-Ing-wen
就是这样一段评论，引起“丝丝”的大“反击”，先是一连几段情绪激烈的评论（各位自己去看吧，挺有意思的），后来大概是越说越气，干脆把我的评论删除并将我拉黑，再接着批判。当然这也不是她对我特别照顾，其他认真批评她的网友，似乎也受到了同样的待遇。例如那位经常批评“老海黄”的网友，前些天还称她“丝丝妹”的，也因一言不和被删贴封嘴，于是“丝丝”雄文后的评论区里只见革命大批判，而被批判者连分辨的机会都没有啦。
“丝丝”网友大概忘了，我们不能在你的博客里和你探讨，总还有自己发文的机会，把是非曲直交由大家去判断，挺好的。现在就让我们就事论事，谈谈蔡的博士学位，好不好？蔡的母校已经证明她确实在那里获得博士学位，这件事情就已经没有什么可争论的了。你可以说蔡的水平差，但你不能说蔡是“假博士”，还那样说就是继续传播谣言。你传播谣言的文章还不止这一篇，那篇所谓“哈梅内伊逃离伊朗”的博文也是。你为什么要这样做啊？
我从来没有删改过网友的评论，也没有拉黑过任何人。我欢迎“丝丝”来此评论，我不一定同意你的观点，但我一定确保你发言的权利。
|
。
