设万维读者为首页 万维读者网 -- 全球华人的精神家园 广告服务 联系我们 关于万维
 
首  页 新  闻 视  频 博  客 论  坛 分类广告 购  物
搜索>> 发表日志 控制面板 个人相册 给我留言
帮助 退出
寡人的博客  
Good company and good discourse are the very sinews of virtue  
https://blog.creaders.net/u/7393/ > 复制 > 收藏本页
网络日志正文
英文杂谈(1):importantly vs.important 2018-05-18 08:55:47

看来有些同学对这两个词的用法并没有把握,没关系,如果你耐心点,花上十分钟看完本文,一定会信心十足。先来看看韦氏词典是如果说的:

Main Entry: importantly

Function: adverb

Date: 1611

1: in an important way

2: it is important that

usage

A number of commentators have objected to importantly as a sentence modifier (sense 2) and have recommended important instead. Actually both the adverb and the adjective are in reputable standard use in this function. Important is always used with more or most <had bronze weapons and composite bows; more important, they utilized the horse and war chariot — Harry A. Gailey, Jr.> <second and most important, the book contains no important woman character — F. Scott Fitzgerald*. Importantly is somewhat more flexible in not requiring more or most <sticks and, just as importantly, unsticks easily — Phoebe Hawkins> <importantly, the leaven in the mixture is quality — George O'Brien〉.

--Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, Eleventh Edition

再来看看美国传统字典对此是如何看的:

usage

Some critics have objected to the use of the phrase more importantly  in place of  more important  as a means of introducing an assertion,  as in More importantly, there is no party ready to step into the vacuum left by the Communists.  But both forms are widely used by reputable writers, and there is no obvious reason for preferring one or the other. In an earlier survey the introductory use of more importantly  was acceptable to half of the members of the Usage Panel.

寡人注:The Usage Panel is a group of nearly 200 prominent scholars, creative writers, journalists, diplomats, and others in occupations requiring mastery of language. The Panelists are surveyed annually to gauge the acceptability of particular usages and grammatical constructions. AHD的PANELISTS可参见

https://www.ahdictionary.com/word/usagepanel.html

另外, 我还查看了一些英国的词典,未发现以more/most important开头的用法,但有由more/most importantly 引导的例句。

More importantly, can he be trusted? (Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary)

She has a pleasant personality, but more importantly, she is well qualified for the job.

If we served more soft drinks, there would be fewer hangovers and, more importantly, fewer drink-driving incidents. (Cambridge Dictionary)

Most importantly, you must keep a record of everything you do. (Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English)

由此可见,英国人在语言的运用上比美国人更严谨,保守,更能坚持语法规则,认同prescriptive grammar,而美国英语比较sloppy,更多的人赞同descriptive grammar是不难理解的。华盛顿州立大学的英语教授Paul Brians就是一个典型,像他这样的媚俗学者可能不少。语言在我看来,就像是一双布鞋,穿的人多了,必然越来越松。美国人太多了,而且很多移民其母语不是英语。以至于像“long time no see”这样的pidgin English也能被接受,许多黑人创造的英语更是当仁不让了。但即使在美国这样对语言不太讲究的国度,还是有不少愿意较真的人。请看哥伦比亚大学新闻学研究生院出版的期刊《哥伦比亚新闻评论》(注:The Columbia Journalism Review is an American magazine for professional journalists that has been published by the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism since 1961)的编辑有关这个话题的评论。读完之后,你不难知道答案,到底哪个更恰当一些。

Important/Importantly

Important ? Well, Interesting

By Evan Jenkins

Steve Parrott, associate director (later director) for university relations at the University of Iowa, e-mailed to ask, “Please consider a few words on ‘more important / more importantly.’ ”

Okay. Mr. Parrott had in mind sentences or clauses that begin with one of those phrases, like “Most importantly, the charges are tied directly to the original topic Mr. Starr was supposed to investigate.”

The short answer is that either form of the word is acceptable. Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary of English Usage (1994) has a lengthy and interesting (really) discussion of the longstanding argument (really) over important vs. importantly, with many citations, and concludes that “both are defensible grammatically and both are in respectable use.”

The tilt here, though, is toward “importantly.” The adverb can stand alone at the start of a sentence or clause — without “more” or “most” or any other modifier — and the adjective can’t.

Try it. Drop the “most” from the example quoted above; the sentence still works. Then, with “most” gone, drop the “ly” from “importantly”; the sentence no longer works.

(Some mindless aversion to “ly” adverbs at the start of a sentence — an extension of misguided rigidity about “importantly”? — must have been at work in the following sentence, since no human being ever spoke this way: “Not surprising, a variety of polls indicate...”)

The arguments for “most important” are strained, as an e-mail discussion with the freelance copy editor Christy Goldfinch of Fort Worth made clear.

“Important” commonly fails to modify any specific part of its sentence, so the adjective advocates contend that it can be understood to modify the whole thing — a “sentence adjective.” Well, “importantly” can certainly be called a “sentence adverb.”

But with “importantly” there’s no need for that dance. The adverb has an element to grab hold of within its sentence, the verb or the overall predicate. (And that, quite apart from any “sentence adverb” justification, makes the literalists’ objection to “hopefully” at the start of a sentence fallacious, as well as outmoded.)

Another argument for “most important” is that the phrase “What is” is understood to precede it. If that were a natural supposition, all sorts of adjectives (with modifiers) could start sentences. But “Most happy, the storm ended,” just doesn’t make it.

The “most” approach is acceptable (not preferable) with the one adjective “important” not on logical grounds but because it is widely used and well established. And in passages that start with modifiers ending in “ly” — “equally” comes to mind — using “important” is handy.

P.S.: Nothing in this sermon should be construed as enthusiasm for “Firstly...,” an irritating start for an even more irritating series.

CJR

Back to Language Corner home

All content © Copyright 2008 Columbia Journalism Review at Columbia University's Graduate School of Journalism.

https://archives.cjr.org/resources/lc/important.php

最后,对在英语语言文化上有点追求,有点讲究的朋友,或者想成为一名wordsmith的人,建议不妨多读一些英文报纸,勤翻字典,或浏览网上词典—几乎所有主要的英文词典都提供免费在线服务。在线词典比纸质的好在可以听词的发音,有更多的例句,而且有一些word game,vocabulary test,以及有关词的用法,历史,演化等的故事。比如这个:

Usage Notes

Is This Cat 'Uninterested' or 'Disinterested'?

https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/uninterested-or-disinterested

牛津字典、韦氏大学词典、剑桥词典,朗文词典,及美国传统字典是我最最喜欢的几本字典,质量非常高。


浏览(1764) (10) 评论(4)
发表评论
文章评论
作者:寡人 回复 木桩 留言时间:2018-05-19 20:30:39

木帅好!欢迎莅临指导。万维招摇撞骗的大师不少,我会不会也是其中之一?你的英文不错,这是我看完你编辑的视频“贝多芬 2”后的印象。前面有人就此话题写了一篇,我觉得有点误导,所以想再多说几句。又要回国了?好羡慕你。巧的很,大约一个月前,我的一个亲戚让我给她的女儿的画作投票点赞,我无意中发现她上的小学是万航渡路小学,可能是你的校友了?

Godspeed & Bon voyage!

回复 | 0
作者:木桩 留言时间:2018-05-19 18:02:34

谢谢大师指点津谜,循循善诱,收益良多。望今后能拜读到更多此类的文章。

我马上要回国了,赶紧在这儿向寡先生问好致意,遥祝先生夏安!

回复 | 0
作者:寡人 回复 俞先生 留言时间:2018-05-18 13:28:49

不客气。如果本文对你有点启发,我会非常高兴。另外,尽量避免使用英汉字典或双解字典,因为这对提高英文表达能力有害无益。除非看了英文解释还是一头雾水,这时才可以借用中文这个拐杖。

回复 | 0
作者:俞先生 留言时间:2018-05-18 11:33:04

谢谢寡人的协助。

回复 | 0
我的名片
寡人
注册日期: 2013-03-28
访问总量: 411,202 次
点击查看我的个人资料
Calendar
我的公告栏
转载请注明出处
欢迎光临!
最新发布
· 穆勒报告揭示美国面临的真正威胁
· 我对几个中国成语的一点疑问
· 穆勒报告公布,句号还是逗号
· 简议能否起诉在任总统及穆勒报告
· 加拿大服役时间最长的军官、二战
· 右翼恐怖主义不容否认
· “川金会”谈崩暴露了一对一外交的
分类目录
【汉语】
· 我对几个中国成语的一点疑问
【川普】
· 穆勒报告揭示美国面临的真正威胁
· 穆勒报告公布,句号还是逗号
· 简议能否起诉在任总统及穆勒报告
· 川普上任两年支持率在各州全面下
· 与阿妞讨论川普的对外政策
· 罗杰斯通被捕通俄门调查决战到来
· 今夜:白宫里小鬼当家
· 新闻漫画中的川普
· 川普应对盟友的离心倾向负责
【加拿大人】
· 加拿大服役时间最长的军官、二战
【辟谣】
· 右翼恐怖主义不容否认
· 老钱:请勿以讹传讹!
· 千禧年夫妇骑车穿越伊斯兰国被杀
· 宋永毅是加州大学的教授吗?
【中国观察】
· 任正非“一不小心”泄露天机
【时事纵横】
· 美国媒体的政治倾向及报道质量
· 纽时惊爆:FBI曾对川普展开反情
· 川粉必读:左媒华邮也挺川
【台湾话题】
· 台湾的国家地位(statehood)—de f
【北美看台】
· “川金会”谈崩暴露了一对一外交的
· 遍布加拿大校园的“熊猫”爪
· 路透:新文件透露孟晚舟案新线索(
· 2018: 加拿大流年不利
· 为了美国的长治久安,请投民主党
· 潘斯向中共扔了一枚超级震撼弹
· 我是特朗普政府中的一名抵抗者
· 某国留美学生几乎都是间谍—fake
· 川普在赫尔辛基的表现令人鄙视(R
【数学】
· 趣味数学—一名初中生提出的数学
【耻辱柱】
· BREAKING NEWS:杰克(aka BFTS)被
· 请看流氓BFTS是如何向正派人泼粪
· 多行不义必自毙—BFTS被处罚
· 流氓“youguli”为何能在万维横行
· 万维臭鞋大赛发榜了!(周末一笑
【英语学习】
· 英文杂谈(2):新春将至话年龄
· 英文杂谈(1):importantly vs.
· 莎士比亚说过这句话吗?
· 奥巴马即将召见SB博
【科学】
· The Edge Of Space - BBC Docume
【婚姻家庭】
· 加州工程师杀岳父母 VS. BC省工
【宗教文化】
· 教皇Benedict为何辞职:令人震惊
· 文化与制度杂谈
· ISIS的前世今生
· 什么样的科学家在反对进化论?
· 转贴:现代中国知识分子的家国情
· 读后感:“易中天:中国需要与统治
【时政】
· 中国通John Pomfret谈中美对台政
· 山东秀才念半边—有感于林建华念
· 普丁受到重击—痛不欲生!
· 习近平的狂妄超乎你想象
· 从shithole countries到peopleki
· 中国的软实力和锐实力
· 真的假文件 or 假的真文件?
· 联邦自由党人的道德操守堪忧
· 袁红冰谈哈德逊事件和郭文贵保卫
· 为什么加拿大人需要开始提防中国
存档目录
2019-04-04 - 2019-04-24
2019-03-04 - 2019-03-18
2019-02-03 - 2019-02-27
2019-01-08 - 2019-01-26
2018-12-14 - 2018-12-23
2018-11-02 - 2018-11-02
2018-10-09 - 2018-10-22
2018-09-06 - 2018-09-23
2018-08-11 - 2018-08-11
2018-07-21 - 2018-07-21
2018-06-22 - 2018-06-24
2018-05-07 - 2018-05-18
2018-03-30 - 2018-03-30
2018-02-05 - 2018-02-28
2018-01-03 - 2018-01-23
2017-12-15 - 2017-12-15
2017-11-25 - 2017-11-25
2017-10-23 - 2017-10-23
2017-07-15 - 2017-07-15
2017-06-02 - 2017-06-02
2017-05-05 - 2017-05-18
2017-04-19 - 2017-04-19
2017-02-08 - 2017-02-27
2017-01-13 - 2017-01-13
2016-12-15 - 2016-12-15
2016-11-24 - 2016-11-24
2016-10-22 - 2016-10-22
2016-06-01 - 2016-06-14
2016-05-12 - 2016-05-12
2016-04-09 - 2016-04-25
2016-02-17 - 2016-02-17
2016-01-26 - 2016-01-27
2015-11-25 - 2015-11-30
2015-10-21 - 2015-10-21
2015-09-11 - 2015-09-29
2015-06-12 - 2015-06-29
2015-03-24 - 2015-03-24
2015-01-19 - 2015-01-27
2014-11-01 - 2014-11-01
2014-10-03 - 2014-10-03
2014-09-10 - 2014-09-10
2014-02-06 - 2014-02-06
2013-10-03 - 2013-10-03
2013-06-11 - 2013-06-11
2013-05-03 - 2013-05-22
2013-04-12 - 2013-04-12
2013-03-28 - 2013-03-28
 
关于本站 | 广告服务 | 联系我们 | 招聘信息 | 网站导航 | 隐私保护
Copyright (C) 1998-2024. Creaders.NET. All Rights Reserved.