即將到來的全球冠狀病毒免疫災難
3月11日，據The Highwire網站報導，世界著名的疫苗專家吉爾特·範登·保茨（Geert Vanden Bossche）博士在本周進行了開創性的採訪，他冒著個人聲譽和職業生涯的危險上書WHO勇敢地表示反對COVID-19疫苗的使用，因為大規模疫苗接種將導致免疫逃避機制出現，進而造成全球免疫災難。
評論：對於大多數讀者來說“免疫逃逸（Immune Escape）”是一個全新的名詞，面對世界頂級疫苗專家的大聲疾呼，我們真的有必要做一點功課來瞭解一下疫苗對人體產生的影響將會有多大。 免疫逃逸是免疫抑制病原體通過其結構和非結構產物，抵抗、阻斷和抑制機體的免疫應答。 病原體的免疫逃逸機制：1）抗原性的變化病原體的中和抗原，可經常地持續性地發生突變，逃逸已建立的抗感染免疫抗體的中和和阻斷作用，導致感染的存在。2）持續性感染胞內病原體可隱匿於胞內呈休眠狀態，逃避細胞免疫和體液免疫的攻擊，長期存活，形成持續性感染。 參考來源： The Highwire的報導 免疫逃逸_百度百科
3分56秒視頻：
https://gnews.org/zh- hant/974722/
Experts sound the alarm about risks of mass vaccination
專家們拉響大規模接種疫苗危險警報
By Contributor
Letter to Editor By Health and Consumer NGOs A LEADING global environmental virologist and microbiologist for 30 years and involved in human vaccine development for 23 years with various major pharmaceutical firms, Dr Geert Vanden Bossche warns that the global vaccination programme amid the global pandemic does more harm than good. Expressing genuine concerns if the vaccination was the right thing to do against this super smart mutating coronavirus, he stated: “If you go to war, make sure you have the right weapon at the right time against the enemy that you understand enough.”
一位從事研究30年的病毒與微生物學家,同時還先後在幾所大型生物製藥公司參予過人類免疫疫苗研發23年的吉爾特.凡登.博歇博士(Dr.Geert Vanden Bossche) ,於3月12日通過馬來西亞媒體<聚焦馬來西亞>發出公開警告:
針對控制中共病毒疫情的全球性疫苗接種,
害處遠大於益處。
他質疑對於這個異常狡猾的變異冠狀病毒,免疫接種是否為合理的對抗手段? 他形容說:”想在戰場上贏,你需要一把合適的武器,並了解你的敵人.”而當今我們製造的武器-免疫疫苗,為我們都做了些什麼?
接種疫苗並沒有預防病毒的感染或傳播,反而創造了更多無症狀帶病毒者。
接種疫苗後僅僅減輕了中共病毒感染的症狀和死亡率,但那是以怎樣的代價換來的?
接種疫苗僅僅是人工刺激了抗原特異性抗體的產生,而有效的,由自然殺傷細胞參與的,針對中共冠狀病毒的中和反應。
疫苗接種後產生的抗原特異性抗體不僅對變異病毒無效,其永久殘留還有與人體免疫自然殺傷細胞競爭的潛在可能,使後者失去對肌體原有的天然保護力。
“教會”病毒逃避人體免疫識別系統,間接創造更多變異毒株。
這種”處處失敗”的策略在任何層面看都是危險的。人類要真正對付冠狀病毒就必須尊重科學。
簡言之,如果我們不人道的處理這個全球性的”帝王級”病毒災難,人類將受難更深重。
大製藥商默克(Merck)的執行總裁坎.夫瑞澤(Kan Frazier)在2020年6月公開表示:在通過快速研製免疫疫苗之前, 應該對這個冠狀病毒有更多了解。默克是免疫疫苗研發的全球典範,歷史上,它曾成功研發出4款有效疫苗, 成功率4/7.默克放棄了對這個持續變異的”帝王級”病毒疫苗不切實際的研發, 非常誠實地轉向尋找治療方法。
美國CDC(US Center For Disease Control and Prevention)負責人於3月2日在CNN的新聞節目中也表示:由mRNA接種在美國創下的樂觀局面會很快被新變種病毒給抹掉.這也支持了博歇博士的觀點.美國政府支持的國家健康研究院(National Institutes of Health,NIH)早已證實mRNA疫苗是一種基因治療方法,這種治療手段可以引起”嚴重健康危害,如毒性,炎症及致癌反應”.全球已經有許多接種輝瑞(Pfizer)mRNA疫苗後的不可解釋的死亡案例及嚴重副反應報道。
專家們向馬來西亞政府及相關部門呼籲:
為防止由接種mRNA疫苗而造成的對人體長期損害,應儘快考慮分類接種人群,而不是所有人。
對每一種已購買的中共病毒疫苗給與一個誠實的”益處與風險分析”。 政府保證不會直接或間接的強迫預防接種,特別是針對”試驗性mRNA疫苗”,因為有違紐倫堡法案。
同時,開放使用伊維菌素(一種經40年臨床使用,原用於抗寄生蟲的安全藥物,在這次全球疫情中被證實也可有效控制中共病毒感染).如同硫酸羥氯喹(Hydroxychloroquine)在美國及世界其它眾多國家的遭遇.
He further warns that the vaccination: Creates more asymptomatic cases to spread the virus as the vaccines do not prevent infection and transmission; Merely suppresses COVID-19 symptoms and can prevent hospitalisation and deaths. But at what price? only stimulates artificially induced antigen-specific antibodies and not natural killer (NK) cells needed to neutralize the coronavirus effectively; Allows antigen-specific antibodies, which may not work on new variants, to remain permanently and compete with, undermine and even destroy capable and loyal warrior NK cells; Helps create new variants and “teaches” the virus on “viral immune escape”; and It is a “lose-lose” situation that is dangerous at all levels, emphasizing that dealing with the coronavirus and pandemic must be based on science. In a nutshell, if we aren’t cautious, humanity – facing a “global catastrophe without equal” – will suffer exponentially by this “emperor” virus. In June 2020, Ken Frazier, CEO of Merck, implored the need to understand the coronavirus more before rushing for a quick solution via vaccines. (Merck is the gold standard for vaccine development and had produced four out of seven successful vaccines in world history) Merck was honest enough to give up its COVID-19 vaccine development programme to this mutating “emperor” virus to focus on a treatment or cure. The Director of US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in stating in a CNN report on March 2 that gains made in the US including the mRNA vaccination could be wiped out by new variants. This supports Dr Bossche’s warning. The US Government National Institutes of Health (NIH) has confirmed that the mRNA vaccine is a form of gene therapy, an approach that can have “serious health risks, such as toxicity, inflammation and cancer.” Already, there are many reported cases worldwide about unexplained deaths and suffering from severe side effects after taking the Pfizer product. Being constructive and based on Dr Bossche’s revelatory warning, we appeal to the Government and its relevant agencies to: Urgently consider deferring, if necessary, the mRNA vaccination programme to truly curb long-term harm; Do an honest “benefits versus risks” analysis for every vaccine purchased based on the latest information (It is UNFAIR to lump these vaccines together as not all vaccines are equal. We are NOT anti-vaxxers but pro-SAFE vaccines); Keep its promise NOT to force – directly or indirectly – vaccination, especially with the experimental mRNA vaccine, which is a breach of the Nuremberg Code; and Consider (after a study) using more appropriate, much safer, and tried and tested vaccines such as using inactivated or attenuated virus technology while choosing the right timing to enforce the vaccination programme. Therefore, we urge the Government to immediately approve Ivermectin, a repurposed” wonder drug” that’s easily available, very safe and effective in preventing and treating COVID-19 and also fund a low-cost Ivermectin Programme. We are aware that Ivermectin poses a major financial threat to some big pharmaceutical firms and unfortunately. Ivermectin is being discredited and demonized by people with selfish interest, whose biased views must be seriously dismissed. In fact, Ivermectin has already been proven to be safe for over 40 years. The Government has nothing to lose by immediately approving Ivermectin in Malaysia, as a prescribed drug. There is no need to wait for clinical trials as people are dying fast and getting infected from COVID-19. We state clearly here that we do not have vested interest, directly or indirectly, in the manufacturing, selling or distribution of Ivermectin. – March 12, 2021
https://focusmalaysia.my/opinion/ experts-sound-the-alarm-about- risks-of-mass-vaccination/
This week, a group of scientists and doctors have issued an open letter calling on the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to answer urgent safety questions regarding COVID-19 vaccines, or withdraw the vaccines’ authorisation.
本周，一群科學家和醫生發表了一封公開信，呼籲歐洲藥品管理局（EMA）回答有關COVID-19疫苗的緊急安全問題，或撤銷疫苗的授權。 這封信描述了COVID-19疫苗技術的嚴重潛在後果，警告可能的自身免疫反應，凝血異常，中風和內出血，“包括在腦，脊髓和心臟中”。作者要求提供證據，證明所概述的每種醫學危險“在被EMA批准用於人類之前，在所有三種疫苗的臨床前動物模型中均未包括在內”。 作者寫道：“如果沒有所有這些證據，我們將要求撤銷使用基於基因的疫苗的批准，直到EMA通過盡職調查適當解決了上述所有問題為止。”
該信致函EMA執行董事Emer Cooke，並於2021年3月1日星期一發送。該信已抄送給歐洲委員會主席和歐洲委員會主席。 它指出：“我們原則上支持使用新的醫療干預措施。” 但是，“存在嚴重的問題，包括但不限於以上所述，EMA批准COVID-19疫苗為時過早，魯re，並且疫苗的使用構成並且仍然構成'人類實驗' ，它曾經並且仍然違反《紐倫堡守則》。” 該小組在公開聲明中說…… “我們剛收到挪威藥品管理局的來信 ，便警告說 ，對於脆弱的老年人來說，COVID-19疫苗的使用風險太大，這正是這些疫苗旨在保護的人群。我們將補充說，由於疫苗的作用機制，刺激具有不利的病理生理特性的刺突蛋白的產生，可能還會有一些尚未衰老且已經患病的脆弱人群。新數據表明，疫苗副作用是 例如以前感染過冠狀病毒的人的三倍 。沒有一種疫苗經過超過幾個月的臨床測試，對於建立安全性和有效性而言，這太短了。 “因此，作為起點，我們認為重要的是要枚舉和評估在接種疫苗後28天內發生的所有死亡事件，並將臨床圖片與未接種疫苗的圖片進行比較。 “更廣泛地說，在開發COVID-19疫苗方面，歐洲委員會議會在2021年1月27日的第2361號決議中指出，成員國必須確保所有COVID-19疫苗均得到高質量的支持合理且以道德方式進行的審判。EMA官員以及歐盟國家/地區的其他監管機構均受這些標準的約束。應該使他們意識到，使用仍處於第3階段研究的醫療產品可能違反第2361號決議。 “根據第2361號決議，會員國還必須告知公民接種疫苗不是強制性的，並確保沒有人在政治，社會或其他方面受到接種疫苗的壓力。還要求各州確保沒有人因不接種疫苗而受到歧視。” 這封信是針對英國政府針對疫苗護照的計劃的請願書 ，該 計劃通過了270,000個簽名，是迫使國會議員考慮辯論所需的兩倍多。請願書將於2021年3月15日在英國議會進行辯論。 以下視頻聲明由COVID倫理學博士，Sucharit Bhakdi教授，醫學微生物學和免疫學名譽教授，德國約翰內斯·古騰堡美因茨大學醫學微生物學和衛生學研究所前主席組成。手錶： The letter describes serious potential consequences of COVID-19 vaccine technology, warning of possible autoimmune reactions, blood clotting abnormalities, stroke and internal bleeding, “including in the brain, spinal cord and heart”. The authors request evidence that each medical danger outlined “was excluded in pre-clinical animal models with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA.” “Should all such evidence not be available”, the authors write, “we demand that approval for use of the gene-based vaccines be withdrawn until all the above issues have been properly addressed by the exercise of due diligence by the EMA.”
The letter is addressed to Emer Cooke, Executive Director of the EMA, and was sent on Monday 1 March 2021. The letter was copied to the President of the Council of Europe and the President of the European Commission. It states: “We are supportive in principle of the use of new medical interventions.” However, “there are serious concerns, including but not confined to those outlined above, that the approval of the COVID-19 vaccines by the EMA was premature and reckless, and that the administration of the vaccines constituted and still does constitute ‘human experimentation’, which was and still is in violation of the Nuremberg Code.” In a public statement the group said… “No sooner did we deliver our letter than the Norwegian Medicines Agency warned that COVID-19 vaccines may be too risky for use in the frail elderly, the very group these vaccines are designed to protect. We would add that, by virtue of the mechanisms of action of the vaccines, to stimulate the production of spike protein, which has adverse pathophysiological properties, there may also be vulnerable people who are not old and already ill. New data shows that vaccine side effects are three times as common in those who have previously been infected with coronavirus, for example. None of the vaccines have undergone clinical testing for more than a few months, which is simply too short for establishing safety and efficacy. “Therefore, as a starting point, we believe it is important to enumerate and evaluate all deaths which have occurred within 28 days of vaccination, and to compare the clinical pictures with those who have not been vaccinated. https://21stcenturywire.com/2021/03 /11/doctors-and-scientists-challenge -european-medicines-agency-Warn ing-of-covid-19-vaccine-dangers/
https://twitter.com/jsdfposjpqyuee1 /status/1371628444446957572
 
|
