(Natural News) There is a “third wave” of the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) barreling our way. And those affected by it will be the “vaccinated” who agreed to get injected with experimental gene therapy cocktails that have forever altered their DNA and made them more susceptible to disease and death.
（自然新闻）武汉冠状病毒（Covid-19）爆发了“第三波”。受此影响的人将是“疫苗接种者”，他们同意注射实验性基因疗法鸡尾酒，这种鸡尾酒永远改变了他们的DNA，使他们更容易患病和死亡。
科学大流行性流感建模小组（SPI-M）编写的一份报告中包含一个承认，即在所谓的第三波中死亡的大多数人都已经被完全注射了中共病毒。
“The resurgence in both hospitalisations and deaths is dominated by those that have received two doses of the vaccine, comprising around 60 per cent and 70 per cent of the wave, respectively,” the report reveals.
报告显示：“住院和死亡病例的再现，主要是由接受 两剂病毒疫苗的人占主导，分别占第三波次疫情的 60％（住院）和 70％（死亡）。”
它进一步解释说：“这可以归因于最有风险的年龄组的高水平摄取。”
该小组的理由是，在50岁以上接受疫苗接种的人群中，大约有 10％的人不会从疫苗中获得任何保护，这是基于90％的“有效率” 的假设。这10％约有290万人。
One analyst predicts around 40,000 deaths while another says there will be closer to 60,000 deaths. Either way, this is a lot of deaths caused by a “vaccine” that in and of itself is completely unnecessary based on the fact that the Chinese virus itself is not even that high-risk.
一位分析师预测会有40,000人死亡，而另一位分析师 则表示将有近60,000人死亡。无论哪种方式，这都是 由于“疫苗”造成的大量死亡，基于中共病毒本身甚至 没有那么高的风险，这种“疫苗”本身是完全没有必要 的。
专家预测，虽然据说每200人中有1人是在“第一波”期间死亡的，而且我们知道 这是过分夸大了，但在第三波中，多达70人中的一人会死亡。 夏季，感染情况普遍减少，但要等到秋冬季节在受到批评以为过于“悲观”之后，一些建模者此后对每位接受过疫苗接种的人的状况如何都抱有乐观的看法。这使人们感觉良好，因此很可能成为不断向前发展的叙事方式。 但是，当人们开始死亡时，他们会与刺刺建立联系，还是仅仅因为未接种疫苗而受到指责？医疗机构似乎总是有一种将责任归咎于真正原因以外的东西的方法。 但是，并非所有来源都预测接种疫苗的结果会很不错。一位分析师表示，备受争议的阿斯利康戳刺在两次注射后只能减少“感染”约31％。其他人则说，这些镜头的表现可能会更好一些，大约为63-65％。 同时，阿斯利康声称其有效率达94％，无视成批刺戳接受者，他们因注射引起的血块而死亡。 还必须考虑季节性因素，因为日照量更大，而其他因素往往意味着在温暖的月份患病较少。不过，只要等到秋冬季节，当季节性疾病开始“蔓延”，并且每一个接种疫苗的人的身体已经准备好对病原体暴露做出不自然的反应时，其免疫系统就会过度运转。 认为细胞因子席卷了这个世界从未见过的类似疾病，导致了大规模的疾病和死亡。 跳过戳刺，过上自己的生活该报告还预测了武汉冠状病毒（Covid-19）的繁殖率或“ R”值将激增，使其恢复到甚至高于整个研究开始时的水平。 该模型表明，到5月17日，R利率将升至2.2，这与之前在英国实施的第二级限制期间的情况相同 甚至支持疫苗接种的商店也开始承认人们的自然免疫反应是由于感染率下降而造成的，即使没有刺针也是如此。同时，尽管许多人预计由于大规模注射运动而使R率上升，但他们仍在推动它们以保持R率低的方式。 “……值得注意的是，这些未接种疫苗的人中有很大一部分已经对先前的感染具有免疫力，或者至少对其他冠状病毒具有一定的天然免疫力，”指出一种否则会支持疫苗接种的来源。 另一方面，承认疫苗接种将导致更多死亡的可怕模型也被用于暗示应该保持封锁和限制，上面引用的同一资料指出的情况并非如此。 它争辩说：“继续以在提出这些模型时已经过时的模型为基础的政策，并不是做出关于国家自由的决定的明智方法。” “现在是时候-谨慎而果断地-基于数据而不是日期，当然也不是模型来发布限制了。” 您可以在此链接上阅读完整的分析。 要了解有关中共病毒注射的最新消息，请务必访问ChemicalViolence.com。 本文的来源包括： Fos-Sa.org NaturalNews.com
Buried within a report compiled by the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Modeling (SPI-M) is an admission that most of the people who will die during the so-called third wave will have already been fully injected for the Chinese virus. “The resurgence in both hospitalisations and deaths is dominated by those that have received two doses of the vaccine, comprising around 60 per cent and 70 per cent of the wave, respectively,” the report reveals. “This can be attributed to the high levels of uptake in the most at-risk age group,” it further explains. The group’s reasoning is that around 10 percent of people over 50 who are vaccinated will not derive any protection from the vaccine, this based on a supposed 90 percent “efficacy” rate. This 10 percent equates to around 2.9 million people. One analyst predicts around 40,000 deaths while another says there will be closer to 60,000 deaths. Either way, this is a lot of deaths caused by a “vaccine” that in and of itself is completely unnecessary based on the fact that the Chinese virus itself is not even that high-risk. While one in 200 people were said to have died during the “first wave” – and we know this was drastically overinflated – as many as one in 70 will die during the third wave, experts predict, all thanks to the vaccine. Summertime sees fewer infections across the board, but just wait until fall and winter After bearing criticism for supposedly being too “pessimistic,” some modelers have since painted a rosier picture about how everyone who has been vaccinated will be just fine. This makes people feel good and will thus likely be the narrative that is perpetuated moving forward. When people start dropping dead, however, will they make the connection to the jabs, or will the unvaccinated simply get blamed? The medical establishment always seems to have a way of assigning blame to something other than the true cause. Still, not all sources are predicting beautiful outcomes for the vaccinated. One analyst says the controversial AstraZeneca jab will only reduce “infections” by about 31 percent after two doses. Others say the shots might perform a little better at around 63-65 percent. AstraZeneca, meanwhile, is claiming an efficacy rate of 94 percent, ignoring the hordes of jab recipients who are dropping dead from blood clots caused by the injection. The seasonality aspect must also be considered as greater sunlight exposure and other factors tend to mean less sickness during the warmer months. Just wait until fall and winter, though, when seasonal illness starts to “spread” and every vaccinated person whose body has been primed to react unnaturally to pathogenic exposure sees his or her immune system kick into overdrive. Think cytokine storms the likes of which this world has never seen, resulting in mass sickness and death. Skip the jab and just live your life The report also predicts a spike in the reproduction rate, or “R” number, of the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19), bringing it back to, or even higher than, what it supposedly was at the start of this whole thing. The model suggests that the R-rate will rise to 2.2 by May 17, which is what it was during the previous Tier Two restrictions that were imposed throughout the U.K. Even outlets that support vaccination are starting to admit that people’s natural immune response is attributable to declining infection rates, even without the jabs. At the same time, they are pushing them as a way to supposedly keep the R-rate low, despite the fact that many expect it to rise because of mass injection campaigns. “… it’s worth bearing in mind that a substantial proportion of these unvaccinated people will already have immunity from a prior infection, or at least some natural immunity from other coronavirus,” points out one source that would otherwise seem to support vaccination. On the flip side, the dire models that admit vaccinations are going to cause more death are also being used to suggest that lockdowns and restrictions should remain, which the same quoted source above points out should not be the case. “Continuing to base policy on models which are already out of date by the time they are presented cannot be a sensible way to make decisions.
“It’s time to move on – cautiously, but resolutely – with the release of restrictions based on data not dates, and certainly not models.” You can read the full analysis at this link. To keep up with the latest news about Chinese virus injections, be sure to check out ChemicalViolence.com. Sources for this article include: Fos-Sa.org NaturalNews.com
点击链接，验明正身：
https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-04 -08-covid-third-wave-mass-death- among-vaccinated.html
https://blog.creaders.net/u/8994/202104/402241.html
以色列特拉维夫大学（Telaviv University）的一项最新研究发现，接种 辉瑞/生物技术（Pfizer/BioNTech）疫苗的人感染中共病毒南非变种的 可能性高出8倍。
参与这项研究的以色列顶级医疗机构克拉里特健康服务（Clalit Health Services）的研究主任冉·巴里切尔（Ran Balicer）教授说：“这是世界上第一个基于真实世界数据的研究表明与原始病毒和英国变异病毒相比，这种疫苗对南非变异病毒的效果较差”。 这项同行评议的研究调查了400名“至少注射过一次辉瑞/生物技术疫苗”并且也感染了南非中共变异病毒的人——他们与400名同样被感染但未接种疫苗的人进行了比较。 研究结果显示，“B.1.351病毒变异在接种疫苗的个体中被发现的几率是未接种者的8倍，及5.4%比0.7%。”辉瑞/生物技术疫苗被认为具有高度的保护性，但显然它对南非病毒株没有那么强的保护性病毒。 特拉维夫大学的阿迪·斯特恩（Adi Stern）承认，这项研究的发现令人不快。 斯特恩说：“我们发现，与未接种疫苗的人群相比，接种第二剂疫苗的人群中南非变异病毒株的比例更高。” “这意味着南非变异病毒株在某种程度上能够突破疫苗的保护。” 他补充说，“根据普通人群的模式，我们本以为只有一例南非变异，但我们看到了八例。显然，这个结果并没有让我们感到高兴。” 然而，目前南非变异的中共病毒在以色列的中共病毒病例中所占比例还不到1%。阿迪·斯特恩说，根据研究结果，应该“继续密切关注”遏制B.1.351变种在以色列传播的努力。 以色列最近推出了一项极具争议的“疫苗护照”制度，给予接种疫苗的人特权，而不是给予未接种疫苗的人特权，这一行动受到公民自由组织的广泛批评。 原文作者：凯瑟琳·萨尔加多(Catherine Salgado)
发布时间：2021年4月13日
原文链接：https://thenationalpulse.com/breaking/covid-variants-affect-vaccinated-more-than-unvaccinated-study-claims/
A new study from Tel Aviv University in Israel has found that people vaccinated with the Pfizer/BioNTech shot are eight times more likely to have the South African variant of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) virus (COVID-19).“It is the first in the world to be based on real-world data, showing that the vaccine is less effective against the South Africa variant, compared to both the original virus and the British variant,” said Professor Ran Balicer, director of research at Clalit Health Services, a top Israeli healthcare provider also involved with the study. The peer-reviewed study looked at 400 people who received “at least one shot of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine” and who had also contracted the South African Covid-19 variant–they were compared to 400 people who were infected as well, but were unvaccinated. The findings showed that “the B.1.351 variant of the virus was found eight times more in individuals who were vaccinated—or 5.4 percent against 0.7 percent—against those who were not vaccinated.” The Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine is supposed to be highly protective, but apparently it is not as protective against the South African strain of the virus. Adi Stern of Tel Aviv University admitted that the study’s findings were an unpleasant surprise. “We found a disproportionately higher rate of the South African variant among people vaccinated with a second dose, compared to the unvaccinated group,” said Stern. “This means that the South African variant is able, to some extent, to break through the vaccine’s protection.” He added, “Based on patterns in the general population, we would have expected just one case of the South African variant, but we saw eight. Obviously, this result didn’t make me happy.” Currently, however, the South African variant of COVID-19 constitutes less than one percent of Israel’s COVID cases. Adi Stern said that, based on the study’s findings, there should be “close continued attention” to efforts to contain the spread of the B.1.351 variant in Israel. Israel has recently introduced a highly controversial “vaccine passport” system which gives vaccinated people privileges not accorded to those unvaccinated, an action widely criticized by civil liberties groups.
 
https://twitter.com/b5kv4E6LWdqQ52d/status/1382493450306682883
https://blog.creaders.net/u/8994/202103/400430.html
 
https://blog.creaders.net/u/8994/202104/401317.html
|
