“絲絲”網友早些時候發了一篇題為《假博士，草包英文（BBC專訪）》的博文。根據視頻中蔡英文的某個發音問題，而斷定蔡英文是“假博士”。例如她在評論區里說：
我不同意她的這種說法，在她的博文後發表了如下評論：
蔡的母校－The London School of Economics and Political Science已經發表聲明證實蔡的博士學位，要尊重事實。蔡是法學博士，不是英國語言文學博士，個別字發音不準有什麼奇怪啊？據此就說她是假博士、是人品問題，太過分了。反對蔡的政治立場沒問題，但如果靠謠言來進行人身攻擊，就是人品問題了。LSE的聲明如下：
LSE statement on PhD of Dr. Tsai Ing-wen
LSE has received a number of queries regarding the academic status of our alumna, Dr Tsai Ing-wen, President of Taiwan. We can be clear the records of LSE and of the University of London -
the degree awarding body at the time - confirm that Dr Tsai was
correctly awarded a PhD in Law in 1984. All degrees from that period were awarded via the University of
London and the thesis would have been sent first to their Senate House
Library. The Senate House Library records confirm that a copy was received and
sent by them to the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies (IALS). There
is a listing of Dr Tsai’s thesis ‘Unfair trade practices and safeguard
actions’ in the IALS index document “Legal Research in the United
Kingdom 1905-1984”, which was published in 1985. Dr Tsai recently provided the LSE Library with a facsimile of a personal copy of the thesis, Unfair trade practices and safeguard actions
which is available to view in the Library Reading Room. We understand
Dr Tsai has also provided a digital version of her personal copy to the
National Central Library of Taiwan.
鏈接：http://www.lse.ac.uk/News/Latest-news-from-LSE/2019/j-October-2019/LSE-statement-on-PhD-of-Dr-Tsai-Ing-wen
就是這樣一段評論，引起“絲絲”的大“反擊”，先是一連幾段情緒激烈的評論（各位自己去看吧，挺有意思的），後來大概是越說越氣，乾脆把我的評論刪除並將我拉黑，再接着批判。當然這也不是她對我特別照顧，其他認真批評她的網友，似乎也受到了同樣的待遇。例如那位經常批評“老海黃”的網友，前些天還稱她“絲絲妹”的，也因一言不和被刪貼封嘴，於是“絲絲”雄文後的評論區里只見革命大批判，而被批判者連分辨的機會都沒有啦。
“絲絲”網友大概忘了，我們不能在你的博客里和你探討，總還有自己發文的機會，把是非曲直交由大家去判斷，挺好的。現在就讓我們就事論事，談談蔡的博士學位，好不好？蔡的母校已經證明她確實在那裡獲得博士學位，這件事情就已經沒有什麼可爭論的了。你可以說蔡的水平差，但你不能說蔡是“假博士”，還那樣說就是繼續傳播謠言。你傳播謠言的文章還不止這一篇，那篇所謂“哈梅內伊逃離伊朗”的博文也是。你為什麼要這樣做啊？
我從來沒有刪改過網友的評論，也沒有拉黑過任何人。我歡迎“絲絲”來此評論，我不一定同意你的觀點，但我一定確保你發言的權利。
| 
