设万维读者为首页 万维读者网 -- 全球华人的精神家园 广告服务 联系我们 关于万维
 
首  页 新  闻 视  频 博  客 论  坛 分类广告 购  物
搜索>> 发表日志 控制面板 个人相册 给我留言
帮助 退出
 
中国现代哲学家学会  
发现自己的绝对力量,它会震惊世界  
网络日志正文
Why Law, Logic, Math and Life are Relative Truth 2025-06-03 08:47:59

Your concise explanation effectively situates **Law, Logic, Math, and Life** as *relative truths* within the framework of **Instancology**, adhering to its seven key principles. Here’s a refined summary with added clarity and emphasis on their *instance-bound* nature: --- ### **Why Law, Logic, Math, and Life Are Relative Truths in Instancology**   1. **Non-Representational**     - They are not descriptions or symbols (e.g., language, models) but *structural conditions* of the world instance. Their truth lies in how the instance *is*, not how it is represented.   2. **Perspective-Independent**     - Neither subjective (mind-dependent) nor objective (observer-independent). They function as *intrinsic frameworks* of the instance, unaffected by perception or interpretation.   3. **Non-Anthropocentric**     - Not human inventions or discoveries. They would govern the instance even without humans—like the "rules of the game" in a self-contained universe.   4. **Micro-World-Bound**     - Only valid within the current **Micro World** (the instance’s structural core). They are its "DNA"—absolute *within* the instance but meaningless outside it.   5. **Instance-Specific**     - No existence or relevance beyond this world instance. Their coherence is *contingent* on the instance’s existence.   6. **Macro-World-Dependent**     - When the **Macro World** (observable spacetime) perishes, they cease—having no transcendent or eternal form. Their "truth" is tethered to the instance’s lifespan.   7. **Non-Transferable**     - Each world instance is *causally isolated*. These elements do not persist or influence subsequent instances; they are *reset* with each new instance.   --- ### **Key Implications**   - **Relativity of Truth**: Their validity is *local*—true only within the instance’s bounds, with no claim to universality.   - **Ephemeral Foundations**: Even the most "immutable" systems (logic, math) are temporary, instance-specific structures.   - **Instance as Ultimate Authority**: Their authority derives solely from being the "rules" of *this* instance, not from any higher or external truth.   This aligns with Instancology’s radical ontology: **Truth is instance-dependent, and no framework transcends the instance that births it.**

浏览(816) (0) 评论(9)
发表评论
文章评论
作者:dominic_cooper 留言时间:2025-08-07 02:00:53

Interesting perspective on how truth varies depending on context—law, logic, and even math do take on different meanings when applied in real life. It reminds me how tools like Branch County Lookup help clarify what’s happening behind legal decisions by offering raw, public-facing information like arrests and bookings: https://branchcountyjails.org/.



回复 | 0
作者:william_taylor 留言时间:2025-08-04 10:26:34

Interesting perspective—especially how it connects abstract reasoning to real-world frameworks like law. In many legal contexts, interpretation varies by jurisdiction, which makes consistent record access vital. Tools like https://arrests-fl.org/ simplify how we engage with case information when clarity is needed most.



回复 | 0
作者:reyes_bunns 留言时间:2025-08-04 08:12:15

That’s a fascinating perspective—how truth can shift based on logic, context, and interpretation. In legal frameworks especially, relativity plays a role in understanding cases and outcomes. If you're curious how this applies in real scenarios, exploring Busted VA Legalities at https://bustednewspaper-va.com offers some compelling real-world examples.

回复 | 0
作者:dominic_cooper 留言时间:2025-08-04 05:18:07

Interesting perspective on how truth varies depending on context—law, logic, and even math do take on different meanings when applied in real life. It reminds me how tools like Branch County Lookup help clarify what’s happening behind legal decisions by offering raw, public-facing information like arrests and bookings: http://branchcountyjails.org/.


回复 | 0
作者:william_taylor 留言时间:2025-08-02 02:48:36

Interesting perspective—especially how it connects abstract reasoning to real-world frameworks like law. In many legal contexts, interpretation varies by jurisdiction, which makes consistent record access vital. Tools like http://arrests-fl.org/ simplify how we engage with case information when clarity is needed most.


回复 | 0
作者:Jason_lee1 留言时间:2025-07-26 03:55:40

That's such a thought-provoking take—it's fascinating how disciplines like logic and law often depend on the lens through which they're viewed. When navigating real-world implications, especially legal ones, I’ve found resources like https://arrests-ca.org/ incredibly useful for understanding how truth plays out in public records. It really puts abstract concepts into concrete perspective.

回复 | 0
作者:sarah_gracia 留言时间:2025-07-24 06:47:43

That's a fascinating take on how concepts like law, logic, and life intertwine through a lens of relativity. It reminded me how essential it is to have access to trustworthy legal tools like https://arrests-tn.org/ especially when navigating real-world complexities in justice systems.

回复 | 0
作者:oslon88 留言时间:2025-07-20 12:27:04

That's such an interesting perspective — relativity does seem to touch every aspect of our thinking, including how we interpret justice. Even legal systems are often filtered through social and cultural contexts. I recently came across this https://aarrestsorg.org/ which shows just how complex and varied public information access can be across jurisdictions.


回复 | 0
作者:allison_autumn 留言时间:2025-07-20 12:01:28

Really interesting take on how our understanding of truth can shift across disciplines and perspectives. The concept of relativity in law especially stands out, since legal outcomes often depend on varying contexts. If you're ever diving deeper into legal records or justice frameworks, this CO criminal database offers a detailed view of criminal case information throughout Colorado.


回复 | 0
我的名片
中国现代哲学家学会
注册日期: 2015-01-10
访问总量: 1,502,391 次
点击查看我的个人资料
Calendar
最新发布
· 为什么在人类历史上,几乎没有“
· 《范式哲学》对中国思想史与中国
· 国人为什么爱“装”?
· Cognitive Progress as Directio
· 范式体系对哲学的关系,相当于熵
· AA in the History of Philosoph
· Why WuXing Is Not Trainable —
友好链接
· Rabbit:Stinger 的博客
· hare:hare的博客
· bunny2:bunny2的博客
· microsoftbug:microsoftbug的博
· InstanceTV:InstanceTV的博客
分类目录
【Mingcheng】
【心言】
· Free book: The Ontology of Nat
· 同学会会长关于哲学研究的对话(2
· 同学会会长关于哲学研究的对话
· 天下大势
· 爱者共天地
· 死亡万岁 -- 清明节留下的一缕思
· 重发: 哲学之爱从何而来?
· [中哲会]新程序启动说明
· 哲学之爱从何而来?
【电视直播】
· USA-China in Depth (1)
· 《中哲会》TV直播频道
【政治】
· 毛泽东的“民族解放”神话:专制的
· 为什么中国人反驳西方理论的观点
· 台湾立足基础-造原子弹
· 中国人缺乏理性会有什么后果?
· 您愿意选谁作为第一届“网络中华
· 中国未来的社会结构(2)
· 我建议在万维上进行一次中国未来
· 川普现在唯一的愿望是当个“前总
· 范例党党员章程
· 谈中国民运的战略与策略(范例党
【传统文化】
· 国学与西方思想的区别是狗尾与貂
· 必须立刻弹劾川普!
· 没文化的鬼子
· 新年伊始中国“十马奔腾”
· 扯住教皇不放—今天世界哪个国家
· 为什么中国读书人很难摆脱中国文
· 中国人的“感性逻辑”
· 也谈“中国知识分子堕落”
· "现在打中国,输赢无悬念&q
· 说!“你脱,还是不脱?!”
【深山兰】
· 从二例看中国古代的思维方式
【其它】
· 语言与国家:俞兴文明进步论的学
· 胡杰纪录片:无人区画展
· 美国为什么伟大?- 只因为一个充
· 六四用一句话说
· 华人应该如何与西方人交往?(1)
· 中国人”也”是同欧洲人一样的理性
· 万维有太多哲学误导!
· 一月二十号白宫会发生哪一幕?
· 中国问题:文字
· 用事实驳斥中共关于朝鲜战争的谎
【比较政策】
· 阶级分化的复苏
【一般】
· 中国为什么不适合搞民主?
· 伯克利新名言:赢了-就是不认输
· 什么是今日美国社会的根本问题?
· 美国人打输了还是朋友,中国人..
· 川普—你为什么如此愚蠢?!
· 压垮川普的最后一根稻草-乔治亚
· 看来川普...
· 中国对中国人的影响
· 中国文化在哪些方面体现了幼稚?
· 对中国人“批判”的看法 - 兼答金
【远方】
· 介绍一下荒诞论:远方的孤独
【何岸泉】
· 辩证法与放屁(ZT)
【哲学资料】
· 为相对主义辩护
· Instancology for Philosophers-
· Ten American Philosophers
· (1)马克思和恩格思的“唯物主义”
· Phenomenology of Spirit, Chapt
· 德国政府决定:在全球范围对使用
· 为什么人需要哲学?
· ZT:Rights
· Is your pet psychic?
· Twin Telepathy: Is there a ‘Sp
【中军】
· 关于精神的问题
· 思维创新的哲学理解(下)
· 思维创新的哲学理解(上)
· 人生究竟是什么
· 悟性创新的本性及闪失
· 悟性的创新及孩子的例证
· 怎样进行讨论
· 文字、语音、语义与创新
· 哲学研究能干点儿啥
· 中国缺少创新的各种看法
【徒子】
· 为什么在人类历史上,几乎没有“
· 《范式哲学》对中国思想史与中国
· 国人为什么爱“装”?
· Cognitive Progress as Directio
· 范式体系对哲学的关系,相当于熵
· AA in the History of Philosoph
· Why WuXing Is Not Trainable —
· 《范式哲学》属于谁-万维,中国
· Why Reason Cannot Reach AA — a
· 为什么中国作不了世界警察?
【嘎子】
· 关于丘成桐的讲话的评论
· 已经转到嘎子博客
· <二> 原本打算单独写一篇
· 哲学同真理的关系以及辩证法的本
【几子】
· What Will Happen to President
· 随想:可口可乐
· 分形与卦像:漫话混沌,科学,与
· 浅议科学实证主义
存档目录
2026-01-01 - 2026-01-14
2025-12-01 - 2025-12-31
2025-11-01 - 2025-11-30
2025-10-02 - 2025-10-31
2025-09-01 - 2025-09-29
2025-08-03 - 2025-08-28
2025-07-01 - 2025-07-29
2025-06-01 - 2025-06-26
2025-05-01 - 2025-05-30
2025-04-01 - 2025-04-30
2025-03-06 - 2025-03-31
2025-02-04 - 2025-02-17
2025-01-23 - 2025-01-23
2024-11-10 - 2024-11-10
2024-08-21 - 2024-08-21
2024-07-28 - 2024-07-28
2024-05-13 - 2024-05-15
2024-03-13 - 2024-03-18
2024-02-06 - 2024-02-06
2024-01-02 - 2024-01-31
2023-12-22 - 2023-12-31
2023-11-05 - 2023-11-19
2023-10-03 - 2023-10-29
2023-09-08 - 2023-09-25
2023-08-12 - 2023-08-20
2023-07-15 - 2023-07-15
2023-06-12 - 2023-06-12
2023-02-02 - 2023-02-27
2023-01-01 - 2023-01-24
2022-12-06 - 2022-12-31
2022-11-30 - 2022-11-30
2022-09-04 - 2022-09-25
2022-08-01 - 2022-08-22
2022-07-01 - 2022-07-21
2022-06-04 - 2022-06-27
2021-03-01 - 2021-03-26
2021-02-02 - 2021-02-26
2021-01-01 - 2021-01-31
2020-12-16 - 2020-12-26
2020-11-03 - 2020-11-27
2020-10-02 - 2020-10-31
2020-09-03 - 2020-09-21
2020-08-07 - 2020-08-26
2020-07-02 - 2020-07-24
2020-06-06 - 2020-06-08
2020-05-01 - 2020-05-12
2020-04-02 - 2020-04-27
2020-03-01 - 2020-03-31
2020-02-04 - 2020-02-25
2020-01-01 - 2020-01-31
2019-12-01 - 2019-12-29
2019-11-02 - 2019-11-17
2019-10-09 - 2019-10-14
2019-09-01 - 2019-09-08
2019-08-01 - 2019-08-24
2019-07-01 - 2019-07-27
2019-06-01 - 2019-06-30
2019-05-04 - 2019-05-29
2019-04-01 - 2019-04-30
2018-01-01 - 2018-01-02
2016-04-14 - 2016-04-20
2015-07-02 - 2015-07-24
2015-06-02 - 2015-06-28
2015-05-01 - 2015-05-31
2015-04-01 - 2015-04-29
2015-03-01 - 2015-03-26
2015-02-01 - 2015-02-28
2015-01-10 - 2015-01-31
 
关于本站 | 广告服务 | 联系我们 | 招聘信息 | 网站导航 | 隐私保护
Copyright (C) 1998-2026. Creaders.NET. All Rights Reserved.