A Closed Argument for AA (Absolute Absolute) Goal To identify what must be the case, given that anything at all exists or appears. I. Starting Point (No Assumptions Beyond the Inevitable) We begin with the weakest possible premise: P0: Something is the case. (Anything—experience, law, object, illusion, relation, denial.) This premise cannot be denied without affirming it. II. Exhaustive Ontological Options If something is the case, then it must fall into one—and only one—of the following categories: It exists in relation to something else It exists independently of all relations There is no third option. III. Elimination of the Relational Option Assume: P1: Everything that exists is relational. Then: Every relation requires a background that allows relation to occur That background cannot itself be only another relation, or the explanation never begins This produces an infinite regress of relations, which explains nothing. A totality of relations cannot ground itself. Therefore: P1 is false. Not empirically false, but ontologically incoherent. IV. Necessity of a Non-Relational Ground Thus: P2: There must exist something that is not relational, yet allows relations to be possible. This is not an optional hypothesis. It is forced by the failure of pure relationality. V. What This Non-Relational Ground Cannot Be Let us remove every possible misinterpretation. It cannot be: A thing (things are distinguishable → relational) A law (laws govern relations) Logic (logic presupposes structure) Mathematics (mathematics presupposes form) Existence (existence is a predicate within a framework) Nothingness (nothingness is a contrast concept) Therefore, this ground is not a member of reality. VI. What Remains After All Removal What remains is not a thing, not a property, not a structure. Yet it must be: Prior to all distinctions Prior to relation vs non-relation Prior to existence vs non-existence Prior to sense, reason, or intuition This is not “nothing”. It is that which allows “something / nothing” to appear at all. VII. Definition of AA (Absolute Absolute) AA is the non-relational, non-structural, non-predicable condition that makes any instance—law, world, being, or relation—possible. It is: Not an entity Not an explanation Not an object of knowledge But it is ontologically unavoidable. VIII. Why AA Cannot Be Doubtful To doubt AA, one must: Use logic (RA) Invoke relations (RR / AR) Presuppose a framework of intelligibility Which already assumes what AA makes possible. Thus: AA is not something you infer. AA is something denial already presupposes. IX. Final Nail (Irreversible Conclusion) Either (a) Reality is an infinite regress of relations (which explains nothing), or (b) There exists a non-relational absolute that grounds all relations. There is no third position. Instancology names (b) AA. X. One-Line Formulation (For Public Use) AA is not what exists, not what relates, and not what is known—but without it, nothing could exist, relate, or be known. Why This Leaves No Room for Doubt It does not appeal to intuition It does not rely on mysticism It does not assert unknowable content It is forced by logical exhaustion Anyone rejecting AA must either: Accept infinite regress, or Smuggle AA back in under another name | 
