By GAVIN BADE

07/23/2020 01:58 PM EDT

Updated: 07/23/2020 05:49 PM EDT

The head of the Chinese Consulate in Houston won’t commit to closing the office — a direct threat of defiance to the State Department’s demand that it be shut down by Friday.

In a wide-ranging interview with POLITICO, Cai Wei, the Chinese Consul General in Houston, said China is protesting the closure order and his office will remain open “until further notice.”

“Today we are still operating normally, so we will see what will happen tomorrow,” he said, declining to elaborate further.

Cai said Beijing has asked the U.S. to rescind its Tuesday order to close the consulate, which China argues runs afoul of international agreements governing diplomatic relations.

“We think that the demand from the U.S. side … is not according to the Vienna convention on consular affairs and also is not according to international practice or [diplomatic] norms, and it violates the China-U.S. consular treaty,” Cai said. “We prepared for the worst scenario but we’ve also launched a strong protest … so we urge the U.S. to abandon and revoke that wrong decision.”

Cai’s remarks came as the South China Morning Post reported that Beijing is likely to close a U.S. consulate in the southwestern city of Chengdu, which is strategically important for the U.S. given its interest in Tibet. But the head of the Houston consulate declined to comment on how Beijing should respond to the order to close his office.

Cai stressed that he is the head representative of the Chinese government in Houston, but China experts said he is unlikely to have the authority to decide on his own whether to keep the consulate open.

“I would be very surprised if the consulate itself can decide without listening to Beijing,” said Ho-Fung Hung, a professor of political economy and sociology who focuses on China at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies. “They must be waiting for orders from Beijing with respect to what to do, and I wouldn’t be surprised if Beijing and the U.S. have been [talking] through the backchannels, discussing the situation.”

“Beijing might give instruction to the consulate at the last minute on what to do,” he added. The Chinese embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Experts said that a refusal to close the consulate would be unprecedented in the history of U.S.-China relations, noting that even the Russian government did not resist when the U.S. closed two of its diplomatic annexes in 2017.

“I interpret [Cai's] comments as more as describing a fluid situation as more than a threat,” said Carla Freeman, director of the Foreign Policy Institute at Hopkins. “Because [not closing the consulate] would be completely unprecedented.”

But if China does try to keep its consulate open, the experts said the U.S. could revoke visas for Cai and his staff, allowing federal agents to arrest and potentially deport them. It was unclear whether the closure demand included expulsion of Cai and his staff, but he told POLITICO that he had no immediate plans to leave the country.

Hours after Cai's comments, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo gave an aggressive speech decrying the Chinese government and justifying the consulate closure by calling it "a hub of spying and [intellectual property] theft." But Pompeo did not address the threat to keep the consulate open, and the State Department did not respond to a request for comment on what consequences it can impose if China refuses to close it.

Other U.S. officials have also accused the Chinese Consulate in Houston of being a part of a Communist Party espionage operation in the U.S. On Wednesday, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), a member of the Intelligence and Foreign Relations committees, tweeted that the office is the “central node of the Communist Party’s vast network of spies & influence operations in the United States.”

Cai rejected those claims, saying that the consulate’s activities comply with international agreements and do not differ from the actions of other nations, including the U.S. And he dismissed local news reports that consular staff were burning classified documents in the compound’s courtyard on Tuesday, after getting word of the State Department’s order.

“We have never done this,” he said, referring to espionage. “What we have done is very legal and follows the law and normal practice.”

Instead of espionage, he said the consulate has been engaged in "mask diplomacy." Cai, who was posted to Houston in August, said he has arranged for masks from China to be delivered to Houston and as far away as Georgia.

“We didn’t make any comments on what happened here" regarding the coronavirus pandemic, he said. "But we knew that some people needed assistance, and needed help, so that’s why we sent the masks."

The Consul General went on to decry the "double standard" of U.S. officials viewing Chinese mask donations as a "hidden agenda" to boost the image of China's ruling Communist Party, saying charity from other nations is not viewed so critically.

“We cannot have a double standard," he said. "China is a communist country whether you like it or not. Our government is the Chinese Communist Party, and we are very proud of this.”

If China does refuse to close the embassy Friday, Hung said a standoff between the two largest economies would likely be welcomed by President Donald Trump, who has stepped up his rhetoric against Beijing as his reelection effort falters.

Chinese President Xi Jinping, on the other hand, is facing pressure from elites at home to deescalate tensions with the U.S. to avoid the imposition of more financial sanctions and visa restrictions. Those penalties are already squeezing wealthy, connected members of the Communist Party who keep much of their wealth overseas, he said.

“Xi Jinping has been starting to face pressure from other elites and leaders over his very tough and aggressive approach to the U.S.,” Hung said. “He has the instincts to show that he is a tough guy, but at the same time I believe there are increasing numbers of Chinese elites that see their interests hurt by conflict with the U.S. over Hong Kong or other things.”

CHINESE STATE MEDIA HAS ADMITTED IT VIEWS THE NOVEL CORONAVIRUS AS A TOOL TO “BEAT” PRESIDENT TRUMP, CONFIRMING THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION’S INSISTENCE CHINA HAS SOUGHT POLITICAL GAIN FROM THE VIRUS.

China Global Television Network (CGTN) issued a nearly six-

minute video entitled “Can COVID-19 beat populism?” in which

the Chinese Communist Party-run network leverages the 

coronavirus as “another straw on the camel’s back to expose 

[Trump’s] hollow politics.”

In addition to attacking President Trump, the video also went after 

China-skeptic political leaders such as Brazil’s Jair Bolsonaro and 

Britain’s Boris Johnson.

The video confirms Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s insistence 

that China has leveraged coronavirus to its benefit.

The Mail reports that Sec. Pompeo “used a visit to London to 

outline a vision for a global coalition to counter the communist 

regime as he accused its leadership of exploiting the coronavirus 

pandemic to further its own interests.”

While President Trump’s actions on coronavirus were certainly 

not “hollow”, moving to suspend travel from China in January, 

CGTN insisted the virus was a “test” that “most of the populist 

leaders have failed.”

CGTN is keen on politicizing coronavirus, insisting its silver lining 

is that “more people are beginning to realize that their populist 

rhetoric is nothing but empty promises.”

“Populist leaders like U.S. President Donald Trump are good at 

whipping up populist sentiment. They look strong. They promise 

they can “get things done.” They are “experts” at manipulating 

people’s feelings. But here’s the twist: They are incompetent at 

solving real threats and problems,” the video added.

The video answers its own question, whether or not coronavirus

 “can beat populism,” with a resounding yes, and revels in the 

conclusion.

Natalie Winters

Natalie Winters is an executive assistant to the editor, as well as a Senior Writing Fellow at the National Pulse. She has previously been published at the WarRoom.org website.