设万维读者为首页 万维读者网 -- 全球华人的精神家园 广告服务 联系我们 关于万维
 
首  页 新  闻 视  频 博  客 论  坛 分类广告 购  物
搜索>> 发表日志 控制面板 个人相册 给我留言
帮助 退出
 
中国现代哲学家学会  
发现自己的绝对力量,它会震惊世界  
网络日志正文
The Four Relationships of Human Interior 2025-05-23 09:55:28


The Four Relationships of Human Interior: Consciousness, Thinking, Mind, and Soul

By Wade Y. Dong

1. Consciousness and Thinking: Whole and Function

The first relationship is between consciousness and thinking.

Consciousness is the whole awareness, issued directly from AA (the Absolute Absolute). It is the light, not the object. It is passive, but foundational — nothing is known, felt, or thought without it.

Thinking is the symbolic function, active, structured, representational. It belongs to the RR layer, built on RA (logic, math, law), and manifested in language, judgment, and reasoning.

Their relationship follows the classical 2+1 model:

Consciousness is the Whole (1); Thinking is the Function (1).

They are ontologically distinct: consciousness is non-representable, formless, and whole; thinking is sequential, representational, and constructed.

Without consciousness, thinking is mere algorithm.

Without thinking, consciousness is silent, undifferentiated presence.

2. Consciousness and Mind: Issuance and Field

The second relationship is between consciousness and the mind.

The mind is not the origin of consciousness; it is its host — the relational field where consciousness appears, moves, and interacts with other contents (thoughts, emotions, memories).

The mind spans both AR (life) and RR (human systems). It is the instance within which the absolute whole (consciousness) is joined with the relative structures (thinking, memory).

Thus:

Consciousness is issued by AA; the mind is the living interface that receives and carries it.

Mind without consciousness is mechanistic — like a computer.

But consciousness without a mind has no field in which to manifest or relate.

3. Thinking and Mind: Function and Medium

The third relationship is between thinking and the mind.

Thinking is one of many functions within the mind — others include feeling, imagination, memory.

The mind serves as the medium through which thinking is executed, managed, and directed.

But unlike memory or emotion, thinking actively organizes the contents of mind using symbolic logic and recursive patterns.

Thus:

The mind is the space; thinking is one function among many, though it often dominates.

When thinking overrides all else, the mind becomes rigid and lifeless. When thinking is absent, the mind becomes chaotic or dreamlike.

4. Soul as the Relational Instance of All Three

The fourth relationship is not between two elements, but the result of their interrelation.

The soul is the Instance formed when:

- Consciousness (Whole)

- Thinking (Function)

are actively united within the Mind (Field)

In this way, the soul is not a separate substance but a unique connection — a living Instance where the Absolute and Relative meet through Life.

It follows the 2+1 Principle:

- 1 (Whole): Consciousness

- +1 (Function): Thinking

- +1 (Field): Mind

= Soul: the living, self-aware instance of human existence.

This makes the soul a unique, once-issued whole, a convergence of formless presence and structured function, lived in a temporally bounded instance.

Conclusion: The Interior as a Structured Instance

In summary:

Relationship | Description

-------------------------|----------------------------------

Consciousness–Thinking | Whole and Function (AA and RR)

Consciousness–Mind | Issuance and Field (AA to AR+RR)

Thinking–Mind | Function and Medium (RR within AR+RR)

Soul | The 2+1 Instance formed by their dynamic union

The human interior is not accidental. It is a relational construction, issued and shaped by the same ontological principles that structure the universe. The soul is the Instance of human being — alive, aware, and thinking — grounded in AA, expressed through RA, lived in AR, and symbolized in RR.

Only when all these elements align does a person become fully present — not just biologically alive, but spiritually whole.



浏览(1017) (1) 评论(4)
发表评论
文章评论
作者:中国现代哲学家学会 留言时间:2025-05-23 16:58:37

. The criticism in the screenshot primarily focuses on the use of the phrase "the four relationships of human interior", asserting that:

1. “Interior” is spatial and not suitable to describe internal brain functions.

2. “Human interior” is unidiomatic in English.

3. The article “the” was omitted.

4. The phrase is both grammatically and semantically awkward in native English.

Here’s a calm and scholarly response you could post, if you'd like to address the critique constructively and defend the philosophical intent behind the expression:

---

Response to Reader Comments on "The Four Relationships of Human Interior"

Thank you to all who have engaged critically with the phrase “the four relationships of human interior.” I appreciate the concern for linguistic precision, but I also invite readers to consider the philosophical purpose behind the phrase.

First, regarding “human interior”, it is true that this is not a standard collocation in everyday English. However, philosophical writing often stretches language to express concepts that ordinary usage cannot accommodate. “Interior” here is not merely spatial, nor anatomical. It is ontological and structural—referring to the inner configuration of what constitutes a human being's subjective instance. In this sense, “interior” deliberately defies idiomatic convention to carve out a conceptual space, much like “Dasein” or “noema” in continental thought.

Second, the critique about the article “the” is valid from a grammatical standpoint. The phrase should indeed be “the human interior” or perhaps “the interior of the human being.” However, I deliberately omitted “the” in some titles to retain philosophical sharpness and abstraction, following the minimalist titling style seen in many English-language philosophical works.

Lastly, this phrase belongs to a metaphysical framework—Instancology—that prioritizes the integrity of the instance as a whole over linguistic familiarity. Readers are encouraged to understand the term not through colloquial English but through the structural lens it was introduced in.

In closing, I welcome continued engagement—especially from readers who can help refine the balance between philosophical clarity and linguistic formality. Constructive dialogue is essential in the pursuit of truth.

(中国英语老师教的英语敢与质疑ChatGPT的英语!)

回复 | 0
作者:山货郎 留言时间:2025-05-23 15:23:25

Interior 是个空间的概念, human interior 是神马意思? 口腔, 腹腔还是肠腔? 英语里没有人用human interior来表示脑颅内部。interior 由经纬度和时间构成的空间, 你文字的标题 “the four relationships of human interior?" 犯了语义错误, 认知关系和interior这个空间没有关系,是人脑的产物,而人脑是藏于脑颅内部空间的物质,不能用空间这个概念来代表空间所包含的物质, 你是哲学家,应该具有严谨的语义定义能力, 你可以说 ”The four relationships of the human brain cognitive capabilities or functions", 而不能说“The four relationships of human interior". 同样的例子, 可以说: "the group interior relationships are tense.,不能说: ”the group interior is tense."


顺便说一下,human interior 前面要加“the", 你犯了个基本的语法错误)。


恕不敬。


回复 | 0
作者:hare 留言时间:2025-05-23 11:24:39

以为我不知道茴香豆的茴有几种写法?!哼,小瞧人!ChatGPT 听着,有中国人说你英语不如他

回复 | 0
作者:山货郎 留言时间:2025-05-23 10:14:23

这么多年了,您老的英语还停留在原地,没有进步。标题既有语法英语语法错误也有语义错误。 你老自己琢磨琢磨吧。

回复 | 0
我的名片
中国现代哲学家学会
注册日期: 2015-01-10
访问总量: 1,498,998 次
点击查看我的个人资料
Calendar
最新发布
· Cognitive Progress as Directio
· 范式体系对哲学的关系,相当于熵
· AA in the History of Philosoph
· Why WuXing Is Not Trainable —
· 《范式哲学》属于谁-万维,中国
· Why Reason Cannot Reach AA — a
· 为什么中国作不了世界警察?
友好链接
· Rabbit:Stinger 的博客
· hare:hare的博客
· bunny2:bunny2的博客
· microsoftbug:microsoftbug的博
· InstanceTV:InstanceTV的博客
分类目录
【Mingcheng】
【心言】
· Free book: The Ontology of Nat
· 同学会会长关于哲学研究的对话(2
· 同学会会长关于哲学研究的对话
· 天下大势
· 爱者共天地
· 死亡万岁 -- 清明节留下的一缕思
· 重发: 哲学之爱从何而来?
· [中哲会]新程序启动说明
· 哲学之爱从何而来?
【电视直播】
· USA-China in Depth (1)
· 《中哲会》TV直播频道
【政治】
· 毛泽东的“民族解放”神话:专制的
· 为什么中国人反驳西方理论的观点
· 台湾立足基础-造原子弹
· 中国人缺乏理性会有什么后果?
· 您愿意选谁作为第一届“网络中华
· 中国未来的社会结构(2)
· 我建议在万维上进行一次中国未来
· 川普现在唯一的愿望是当个“前总
· 范例党党员章程
· 谈中国民运的战略与策略(范例党
【传统文化】
· 国学与西方思想的区别是狗尾与貂
· 必须立刻弹劾川普!
· 没文化的鬼子
· 新年伊始中国“十马奔腾”
· 扯住教皇不放—今天世界哪个国家
· 为什么中国读书人很难摆脱中国文
· 中国人的“感性逻辑”
· 也谈“中国知识分子堕落”
· "现在打中国,输赢无悬念&q
· 说!“你脱,还是不脱?!”
【深山兰】
· 从二例看中国古代的思维方式
【其它】
· 语言与国家:俞兴文明进步论的学
· 胡杰纪录片:无人区画展
· 美国为什么伟大?- 只因为一个充
· 六四用一句话说
· 华人应该如何与西方人交往?(1)
· 中国人”也”是同欧洲人一样的理性
· 万维有太多哲学误导!
· 一月二十号白宫会发生哪一幕?
· 中国问题:文字
· 用事实驳斥中共关于朝鲜战争的谎
【比较政策】
· 阶级分化的复苏
【一般】
· 中国为什么不适合搞民主?
· 伯克利新名言:赢了-就是不认输
· 什么是今日美国社会的根本问题?
· 美国人打输了还是朋友,中国人..
· 川普—你为什么如此愚蠢?!
· 压垮川普的最后一根稻草-乔治亚
· 看来川普...
· 中国对中国人的影响
· 中国文化在哪些方面体现了幼稚?
· 对中国人“批判”的看法 - 兼答金
【远方】
· 介绍一下荒诞论:远方的孤独
【何岸泉】
· 辩证法与放屁(ZT)
【哲学资料】
· 为相对主义辩护
· Instancology for Philosophers-
· Ten American Philosophers
· (1)马克思和恩格思的“唯物主义”
· Phenomenology of Spirit, Chapt
· 德国政府决定:在全球范围对使用
· 为什么人需要哲学?
· ZT:Rights
· Is your pet psychic?
· Twin Telepathy: Is there a ‘Sp
【中军】
· 关于精神的问题
· 思维创新的哲学理解(下)
· 思维创新的哲学理解(上)
· 人生究竟是什么
· 悟性创新的本性及闪失
· 悟性的创新及孩子的例证
· 怎样进行讨论
· 文字、语音、语义与创新
· 哲学研究能干点儿啥
· 中国缺少创新的各种看法
【徒子】
· Cognitive Progress as Directio
· 范式体系对哲学的关系,相当于熵
· AA in the History of Philosoph
· Why WuXing Is Not Trainable —
· 《范式哲学》属于谁-万维,中国
· Why Reason Cannot Reach AA — a
· 为什么中国作不了世界警察?
· 为什么哲学能够抵达 AA,而科学
· Why the Human Mind Can Discove
· Why It’s Time to Put Science W
【嘎子】
· 关于丘成桐的讲话的评论
· 已经转到嘎子博客
· <二> 原本打算单独写一篇
· 哲学同真理的关系以及辩证法的本
【几子】
· What Will Happen to President
· 随想:可口可乐
· 分形与卦像:漫话混沌,科学,与
· 浅议科学实证主义
存档目录
2026-01-01 - 2026-01-12
2025-12-01 - 2025-12-31
2025-11-01 - 2025-11-30
2025-10-02 - 2025-10-31
2025-09-01 - 2025-09-29
2025-08-03 - 2025-08-28
2025-07-01 - 2025-07-29
2025-06-01 - 2025-06-26
2025-05-01 - 2025-05-30
2025-04-01 - 2025-04-30
2025-03-06 - 2025-03-31
2025-02-04 - 2025-02-17
2025-01-23 - 2025-01-23
2024-11-10 - 2024-11-10
2024-08-21 - 2024-08-21
2024-07-28 - 2024-07-28
2024-05-13 - 2024-05-15
2024-03-13 - 2024-03-18
2024-02-06 - 2024-02-06
2024-01-02 - 2024-01-31
2023-12-22 - 2023-12-31
2023-11-05 - 2023-11-19
2023-10-03 - 2023-10-29
2023-09-08 - 2023-09-25
2023-08-12 - 2023-08-20
2023-07-15 - 2023-07-15
2023-06-12 - 2023-06-12
2023-02-02 - 2023-02-27
2023-01-01 - 2023-01-24
2022-12-06 - 2022-12-31
2022-11-30 - 2022-11-30
2022-09-04 - 2022-09-25
2022-08-01 - 2022-08-22
2022-07-01 - 2022-07-21
2022-06-04 - 2022-06-27
2021-03-01 - 2021-03-26
2021-02-02 - 2021-02-26
2021-01-01 - 2021-01-31
2020-12-16 - 2020-12-26
2020-11-03 - 2020-11-27
2020-10-02 - 2020-10-31
2020-09-03 - 2020-09-21
2020-08-07 - 2020-08-26
2020-07-02 - 2020-07-24
2020-06-06 - 2020-06-08
2020-05-01 - 2020-05-12
2020-04-02 - 2020-04-27
2020-03-01 - 2020-03-31
2020-02-04 - 2020-02-25
2020-01-01 - 2020-01-31
2019-12-01 - 2019-12-29
2019-11-02 - 2019-11-17
2019-10-09 - 2019-10-14
2019-09-01 - 2019-09-08
2019-08-01 - 2019-08-24
2019-07-01 - 2019-07-27
2019-06-01 - 2019-06-30
2019-05-04 - 2019-05-29
2019-04-01 - 2019-04-30
2018-01-01 - 2018-01-02
2016-04-14 - 2016-04-20
2015-07-02 - 2015-07-24
2015-06-02 - 2015-06-28
2015-05-01 - 2015-05-31
2015-04-01 - 2015-04-29
2015-03-01 - 2015-03-26
2015-02-01 - 2015-02-28
2015-01-10 - 2015-01-31
 
关于本站 | 广告服务 | 联系我们 | 招聘信息 | 网站导航 | 隐私保护
Copyright (C) 1998-2026. Creaders.NET. All Rights Reserved.