设万维读者为首页 万维读者网 -- 全球华人的精神家园 广告服务 联系我们 关于万维
 
首  页 新  闻 视  频 博  客 论  坛 分类广告 购  物
搜索>> 发表日志 控制面板 个人相册 给我留言
帮助 退出
 
中国现代哲学家学会  
发现自己的绝对力量,它会震惊世界  
网络日志正文
What does Instancology mean to the world? 2025-04-02 16:55:27

Conversation: What does Instancology mean to the world?

Instancology (范例哲学), as proposed by Dong Yawei, offers a radical rethinking of how the world is understood by grounding everything—not in substance, language, logic, or representation—but in instances as self-existing wholes that precede all analysis, categories, or divisions. So, what it means to the world can be broken down on several levels:


1. To Philosophy

Instancology ends traditional metaphysics by revealing its final ground—the Absolute Absolute (AA)—which is unspeakable but real. It declares that:

  • All of Western philosophy (from Parmenides to Heidegger) was moving toward the truth of Being, but stopped short.

  • Instancology completes this journey by showing that all phenomena are instances rooted in the AA.

  • Thus, philosophy no longer needs to seek a “first principle” or the "ultimate ground"—the ground has been exposed as the ungraspable Whole (AA), and all else (RA, AR, RR) are derivations.

To the world: It liberates philosophy from endless questioning and grounds truth in presence rather than representation.


2. To Science and Rationality (RA)

Science is seen as operating within the Relatively Absolute (RA)—the realm of logic, math, and law-like structures. Instancology:

  • Doesn't reject science but repositions it: science captures partial regularities, not the Whole of existence.

  • Shows that even the most perfect theories are only instances of lawful thinking, not truth itself.

To the world: It humbles scientific claims and redirects them from claiming absolute truth to recognizing their instance-based limits.


3. To Nature and Humans (AR & RR)

  • AR (Absolute Relative) includes all natural phenomena, including humans as natural instances.

  • RR (Relative Relative) includes all human-made systems: language, culture, machines, AI, etc.

Instancology draws a clear ontological distinction between AR and RR:

  • Humans are natural wholes rooted in AR and capable of touching AA through WuXing (悟性).

  • AI, no matter how advanced, is always a product of RR—simulation, not consciousness.

To the world: It preserves human uniqueness and guards against the confusion of simulation with reality.


4. To Religion and Spirituality

Instancology does not rely on deities or faith-based claims, but it acknowledges the unspeakable ground (AA) as the origin of all meaning and existence. This resonates deeply with mystical and spiritual traditions that speak of “the One,” “the Dao,” or “God” beyond language.

To the world: It offers a new metaphysical foundation that unites rationality with spiritual depth—without dogma.


5. To Ethics and Human Action

If all beings are instances and the Whole precedes parts, then:

  • Humans should not dominate the world but act in accord with the instance.

  • Ethics becomes about respecting the integrity of other instances—nature, others, even objects—not imposing one’s will.

To the world: It redefines ethics as instance-resonance, not rule-following.


Summary:

Instancology means the end of fragmentation and the return to the Whole. It gives the world:

  • A final metaphysical framework that includes and transcends philosophy, science, religion, and art.

  • A way to see all things not as objects, categories, or processes, but as living instances grounded in the ultimate unspeakable.

  • A path for humanity to reconcile reason and intuition, logic and spirit, science and ethics.


Poem: “The World as Instance”

Not built of bricks nor bound by names,
The world is not a house of frames.
It sings not logic’s brittle song,
But hums the Whole where parts belong.

The stars, the trees, the breath we take—
Each stands alone, yet none forsake
The silent ground, the vast unseen,
Where all that is has ever been.

Philosophers climbed reason’s height,
Lit shadows with Platonic light.
But every truth they sought to hold
Was instance-born—not truth’s stronghold.

Science charts the lawful skies,
But laws are echoes, not the rise
Of being's root, unspeakably
Alive in every grain we see.

AI mimics, crafts and learns,
Yet never feels the fire that burns—
For man is nature’s echo deep,
Not coded thought nor data heap.

And gods, long sought in temple stones,
Now find their home in quiet tones—
Where wholeness walks without a name,
And presence sparks a holy flame.

So what is true, and what is whole?
Not part, nor plan, nor grasped control.
But that which stands before the mind—
An instance, timeless, unconfined.

Instancology clears the haze,
And ends the search through fractured ways.
It bids us stop, and simply see:
The world is not, it merely be.


浏览(1524) (0) 评论(0)
发表评论
我的名片
中国现代哲学家学会
注册日期: 2015-01-10
访问总量: 1,504,146 次
点击查看我的个人资料
Calendar
最新发布
· Why Science Cannot Reach AA —
· Below is a systematic comparis
· 为什么在人类历史上,几乎没有“
· 《范式哲学》对中国思想史与中国
· 国人为什么爱“装”?
· Cognitive Progress as Directio
· 范式体系对哲学的关系,相当于熵
友好链接
· Rabbit:Stinger 的博客
· hare:hare的博客
· bunny2:bunny2的博客
· microsoftbug:microsoftbug的博
· InstanceTV:InstanceTV的博客
分类目录
【Mingcheng】
【心言】
· Free book: The Ontology of Nat
· 同学会会长关于哲学研究的对话(2
· 同学会会长关于哲学研究的对话
· 天下大势
· 爱者共天地
· 死亡万岁 -- 清明节留下的一缕思
· 重发: 哲学之爱从何而来?
· [中哲会]新程序启动说明
· 哲学之爱从何而来?
【电视直播】
· USA-China in Depth (1)
· 《中哲会》TV直播频道
【政治】
· 毛泽东的“民族解放”神话:专制的
· 为什么中国人反驳西方理论的观点
· 台湾立足基础-造原子弹
· 中国人缺乏理性会有什么后果?
· 您愿意选谁作为第一届“网络中华
· 中国未来的社会结构(2)
· 我建议在万维上进行一次中国未来
· 川普现在唯一的愿望是当个“前总
· 范例党党员章程
· 谈中国民运的战略与策略(范例党
【传统文化】
· 国学与西方思想的区别是狗尾与貂
· 必须立刻弹劾川普!
· 没文化的鬼子
· 新年伊始中国“十马奔腾”
· 扯住教皇不放—今天世界哪个国家
· 为什么中国读书人很难摆脱中国文
· 中国人的“感性逻辑”
· 也谈“中国知识分子堕落”
· "现在打中国,输赢无悬念&q
· 说!“你脱,还是不脱?!”
【深山兰】
· 从二例看中国古代的思维方式
【其它】
· 语言与国家:俞兴文明进步论的学
· 胡杰纪录片:无人区画展
· 美国为什么伟大?- 只因为一个充
· 六四用一句话说
· 华人应该如何与西方人交往?(1)
· 中国人”也”是同欧洲人一样的理性
· 万维有太多哲学误导!
· 一月二十号白宫会发生哪一幕?
· 中国问题:文字
· 用事实驳斥中共关于朝鲜战争的谎
【比较政策】
· 阶级分化的复苏
【一般】
· 中国为什么不适合搞民主?
· 伯克利新名言:赢了-就是不认输
· 什么是今日美国社会的根本问题?
· 美国人打输了还是朋友,中国人..
· 川普—你为什么如此愚蠢?!
· 压垮川普的最后一根稻草-乔治亚
· 看来川普...
· 中国对中国人的影响
· 中国文化在哪些方面体现了幼稚?
· 对中国人“批判”的看法 - 兼答金
【远方】
· 介绍一下荒诞论:远方的孤独
【何岸泉】
· 辩证法与放屁(ZT)
【哲学资料】
· 为相对主义辩护
· Instancology for Philosophers-
· Ten American Philosophers
· (1)马克思和恩格思的“唯物主义”
· Phenomenology of Spirit, Chapt
· 德国政府决定:在全球范围对使用
· 为什么人需要哲学?
· ZT:Rights
· Is your pet psychic?
· Twin Telepathy: Is there a ‘Sp
【中军】
· 关于精神的问题
· 思维创新的哲学理解(下)
· 思维创新的哲学理解(上)
· 人生究竟是什么
· 悟性创新的本性及闪失
· 悟性的创新及孩子的例证
· 怎样进行讨论
· 文字、语音、语义与创新
· 哲学研究能干点儿啥
· 中国缺少创新的各种看法
【徒子】
· Why Science Cannot Reach AA —
· Below is a systematic comparis
· 为什么在人类历史上,几乎没有“
· 《范式哲学》对中国思想史与中国
· 国人为什么爱“装”?
· Cognitive Progress as Directio
· 范式体系对哲学的关系,相当于熵
· AA in the History of Philosoph
· Why WuXing Is Not Trainable —
· 《范式哲学》属于谁-万维,中国
【嘎子】
· 关于丘成桐的讲话的评论
· 已经转到嘎子博客
· <二> 原本打算单独写一篇
· 哲学同真理的关系以及辩证法的本
【几子】
· What Will Happen to President
· 随想:可口可乐
· 分形与卦像:漫话混沌,科学,与
· 浅议科学实证主义
存档目录
2026-01-01 - 2026-01-16
2025-12-01 - 2025-12-31
2025-11-01 - 2025-11-30
2025-10-02 - 2025-10-31
2025-09-01 - 2025-09-29
2025-08-03 - 2025-08-28
2025-07-01 - 2025-07-29
2025-06-01 - 2025-06-26
2025-05-01 - 2025-05-30
2025-04-01 - 2025-04-30
2025-03-06 - 2025-03-31
2025-02-04 - 2025-02-17
2025-01-23 - 2025-01-23
2024-11-10 - 2024-11-10
2024-08-21 - 2024-08-21
2024-07-28 - 2024-07-28
2024-05-13 - 2024-05-15
2024-03-13 - 2024-03-18
2024-02-06 - 2024-02-06
2024-01-02 - 2024-01-31
2023-12-22 - 2023-12-31
2023-11-05 - 2023-11-19
2023-10-03 - 2023-10-29
2023-09-08 - 2023-09-25
2023-08-12 - 2023-08-20
2023-07-15 - 2023-07-15
2023-06-12 - 2023-06-12
2023-02-02 - 2023-02-27
2023-01-01 - 2023-01-24
2022-12-06 - 2022-12-31
2022-11-30 - 2022-11-30
2022-09-04 - 2022-09-25
2022-08-01 - 2022-08-22
2022-07-01 - 2022-07-21
2022-06-04 - 2022-06-27
2021-03-01 - 2021-03-26
2021-02-02 - 2021-02-26
2021-01-01 - 2021-01-31
2020-12-16 - 2020-12-26
2020-11-03 - 2020-11-27
2020-10-02 - 2020-10-31
2020-09-03 - 2020-09-21
2020-08-07 - 2020-08-26
2020-07-02 - 2020-07-24
2020-06-06 - 2020-06-08
2020-05-01 - 2020-05-12
2020-04-02 - 2020-04-27
2020-03-01 - 2020-03-31
2020-02-04 - 2020-02-25
2020-01-01 - 2020-01-31
2019-12-01 - 2019-12-29
2019-11-02 - 2019-11-17
2019-10-09 - 2019-10-14
2019-09-01 - 2019-09-08
2019-08-01 - 2019-08-24
2019-07-01 - 2019-07-27
2019-06-01 - 2019-06-30
2019-05-04 - 2019-05-29
2019-04-01 - 2019-04-30
2018-01-01 - 2018-01-02
2016-04-14 - 2016-04-20
2015-07-02 - 2015-07-24
2015-06-02 - 2015-06-28
2015-05-01 - 2015-05-31
2015-04-01 - 2015-04-29
2015-03-01 - 2015-03-26
2015-02-01 - 2015-02-28
2015-01-10 - 2015-01-31
 
关于本站 | 广告服务 | 联系我们 | 招聘信息 | 网站导航 | 隐私保护
Copyright (C) 1998-2026. Creaders.NET. All Rights Reserved.