设万维读者为首页 万维读者网 -- 全球华人的精神家园 广告服务 联系我们 关于万维
 
首  页 新  闻 视  频 博  客 论  坛 分类广告 购  物
搜索>> 发表日志 控制面板 个人相册 给我留言
帮助 退出
 
中国现代哲学家学会  
发现自己的绝对力量,它会震惊世界  
网络日志正文
Truth Is a System — From RR to AA 2026-01-17 07:05:44

Truth Is a System — From RR to AA

Truth is not a sentence, a proposition, or a single correct statement.

Truth is a system—a structured progression that unfolds across levels of reality and cognition. From the perspective of Instancology, truth is neither instantly given nor arbitrarily constructed; it is systematically disclosed, moving from RR (Relative–Relative) toward AA (Absolute–Absolute).

1. Why Truth Cannot Be a Single Claim

If truth were merely a correct statement, then:

different sciences would not conflict,

philosophies would converge quickly,

and history would not be a graveyard of “once-true” doctrines.

Yet the opposite is the case. What we call “truth” changes with:

context,

framework,

cognitive tools,

and ontological depth.

This already tells us something fundamental:

truth behaves like a system, not like a point.

2. RR: Truth as Human Construction

At the RR level, truth appears as:

opinions,

conventions,

social consensus,

linguistic formulations,

ideological systems,

scientific models as tools.

Here, truth is:

negotiable,

revisable,

historically contingent.

RR-truth answers the question:

“What works, convinces, or stabilizes human interaction?”

This is where most debates occur—and also where most confusion arises, because RR-truth is often mistaken for ultimate truth.

RR is not false.

But RR is never final.

3. AR: Truth as Natural Constraint

Moving beyond human construction, AR (Absolute–Relative) introduces truth as:

natural law,

physical constraint,

biological necessity,

causal structure independent of belief.

At this level:

gravity does not negotiate,

death does not vote,

entropy does not care about ideology.

AR-truth answers the question:

“What must be the case, regardless of human agreement?”

Yet even here, truth is still inside reality.

Natural laws describe how reality behaves, not why reality exists at all.

AR is stronger than RR—but still not ultimate.

4. RA: Truth as Formless Structure

RA (Relatively Absolute) is where truth undergoes a decisive shift.

Here truth is no longer:

empirical,

experiential,

representational.

Instead, it appears as:

logic,

mathematics,

structural necessity,

non-empirical constraint.

RA-truth does not describe the world;

it conditions any possible description of the world.

Logic does not exist in nature the way trees do.

Mathematics does not occupy space-time.

Yet without them, no knowledge is possible.

RA answers the question:

“What must hold for anything to be intelligible at all?”

Still, even RA has a limit:

it explains structure, but not the existence of structure itself.

5. AA: Truth as Condition, Not Content

AA (Absolute–Absolute) is not a higher theory.

It is not a deeper law.

It is not an ultimate equation.

AA is the condition of all truth, not another truth within the system.

At AA:

explanation ends,

grounding stops,

questioning collapses—not by force, but by necessity.

AA does not say anything. AA does not represent anything. AA is that which makes saying and representing possible at all.

This is why AA:

cannot be proved,

cannot be denied,

cannot be replaced.

To demand proof of AA is already to presuppose it.

6. Truth as a Vertical System

From this perspective, truth unfolds as a vertical structure:

RR: truth as agreement and construction

AR: truth as natural necessity

RA: truth as structural condition

AA: truth as unspeakable ground

Each level:

is valid in its own domain,

fails when absolutized,

becomes coherent only within the full system.

Truth is not relative or absolute in isolation.

Truth is systematic.

7. The Core Insight

Most philosophical conflicts arise because:

RR argues against AR,

AR dismisses RA,

RA ignores AA,

and AA is mistaken for mysticism.

Instancology resolves this by recognizing that:

truth is not found by choosing a level, but by understanding the system.

The journey from RR to AA is not optional.

It is the structure of truth itself.

Final Statement

Truth is not what we say.

Not what works.

Not even what must happen.

Truth is the system through which all saying, working, and happening become possible—

a system that begins in RR and terminates, necessarily and silently, in AA.

浏览(86) (0) 评论(0)
发表评论
我的名片
中国现代哲学家学会
注册日期: 2015-01-10
访问总量: 1,505,441 次
点击查看我的个人资料
Calendar
最新发布
· Truth Is a System — From RR to
· Why Science Cannot Reach AA —
· Below is a systematic comparis
· 为什么在人类历史上,几乎没有“
· 《范式哲学》对中国思想史与中国
· 国人为什么爱“装”?
· Cognitive Progress as Directio
友好链接
· Rabbit:Stinger 的博客
· hare:hare的博客
· bunny2:bunny2的博客
· microsoftbug:microsoftbug的博
· InstanceTV:InstanceTV的博客
分类目录
【Mingcheng】
【心言】
· Free book: The Ontology of Nat
· 同学会会长关于哲学研究的对话(2
· 同学会会长关于哲学研究的对话
· 天下大势
· 爱者共天地
· 死亡万岁 -- 清明节留下的一缕思
· 重发: 哲学之爱从何而来?
· [中哲会]新程序启动说明
· 哲学之爱从何而来?
【电视直播】
· USA-China in Depth (1)
· 《中哲会》TV直播频道
【政治】
· 毛泽东的“民族解放”神话:专制的
· 为什么中国人反驳西方理论的观点
· 台湾立足基础-造原子弹
· 中国人缺乏理性会有什么后果?
· 您愿意选谁作为第一届“网络中华
· 中国未来的社会结构(2)
· 我建议在万维上进行一次中国未来
· 川普现在唯一的愿望是当个“前总
· 范例党党员章程
· 谈中国民运的战略与策略(范例党
【传统文化】
· 国学与西方思想的区别是狗尾与貂
· 必须立刻弹劾川普!
· 没文化的鬼子
· 新年伊始中国“十马奔腾”
· 扯住教皇不放—今天世界哪个国家
· 为什么中国读书人很难摆脱中国文
· 中国人的“感性逻辑”
· 也谈“中国知识分子堕落”
· "现在打中国,输赢无悬念&q
· 说!“你脱,还是不脱?!”
【深山兰】
· 从二例看中国古代的思维方式
【其它】
· 语言与国家:俞兴文明进步论的学
· 胡杰纪录片:无人区画展
· 美国为什么伟大?- 只因为一个充
· 六四用一句话说
· 华人应该如何与西方人交往?(1)
· 中国人”也”是同欧洲人一样的理性
· 万维有太多哲学误导!
· 一月二十号白宫会发生哪一幕?
· 中国问题:文字
· 用事实驳斥中共关于朝鲜战争的谎
【比较政策】
· 阶级分化的复苏
【一般】
· 中国为什么不适合搞民主?
· 伯克利新名言:赢了-就是不认输
· 什么是今日美国社会的根本问题?
· 美国人打输了还是朋友,中国人..
· 川普—你为什么如此愚蠢?!
· 压垮川普的最后一根稻草-乔治亚
· 看来川普...
· 中国对中国人的影响
· 中国文化在哪些方面体现了幼稚?
· 对中国人“批判”的看法 - 兼答金
【远方】
· 介绍一下荒诞论:远方的孤独
【何岸泉】
· 辩证法与放屁(ZT)
【哲学资料】
· 为相对主义辩护
· Instancology for Philosophers-
· Ten American Philosophers
· (1)马克思和恩格思的“唯物主义”
· Phenomenology of Spirit, Chapt
· 德国政府决定:在全球范围对使用
· 为什么人需要哲学?
· ZT:Rights
· Is your pet psychic?
· Twin Telepathy: Is there a ‘Sp
【中军】
· 关于精神的问题
· 思维创新的哲学理解(下)
· 思维创新的哲学理解(上)
· 人生究竟是什么
· 悟性创新的本性及闪失
· 悟性的创新及孩子的例证
· 怎样进行讨论
· 文字、语音、语义与创新
· 哲学研究能干点儿啥
· 中国缺少创新的各种看法
【徒子】
· Truth Is a System — From RR to
· Why Science Cannot Reach AA —
· Below is a systematic comparis
· 为什么在人类历史上,几乎没有“
· 《范式哲学》对中国思想史与中国
· 国人为什么爱“装”?
· Cognitive Progress as Directio
· 范式体系对哲学的关系,相当于熵
· AA in the History of Philosoph
· Why WuXing Is Not Trainable —
【嘎子】
· 关于丘成桐的讲话的评论
· 已经转到嘎子博客
· <二> 原本打算单独写一篇
· 哲学同真理的关系以及辩证法的本
【几子】
· What Will Happen to President
· 随想:可口可乐
· 分形与卦像:漫话混沌,科学,与
· 浅议科学实证主义
存档目录
2026-01-01 - 2026-01-17
2025-12-01 - 2025-12-31
2025-11-01 - 2025-11-30
2025-10-02 - 2025-10-31
2025-09-01 - 2025-09-29
2025-08-03 - 2025-08-28
2025-07-01 - 2025-07-29
2025-06-01 - 2025-06-26
2025-05-01 - 2025-05-30
2025-04-01 - 2025-04-30
2025-03-06 - 2025-03-31
2025-02-04 - 2025-02-17
2025-01-23 - 2025-01-23
2024-11-10 - 2024-11-10
2024-08-21 - 2024-08-21
2024-07-28 - 2024-07-28
2024-05-13 - 2024-05-15
2024-03-13 - 2024-03-18
2024-02-06 - 2024-02-06
2024-01-02 - 2024-01-31
2023-12-22 - 2023-12-31
2023-11-05 - 2023-11-19
2023-10-03 - 2023-10-29
2023-09-08 - 2023-09-25
2023-08-12 - 2023-08-20
2023-07-15 - 2023-07-15
2023-06-12 - 2023-06-12
2023-02-02 - 2023-02-27
2023-01-01 - 2023-01-24
2022-12-06 - 2022-12-31
2022-11-30 - 2022-11-30
2022-09-04 - 2022-09-25
2022-08-01 - 2022-08-22
2022-07-01 - 2022-07-21
2022-06-04 - 2022-06-27
2021-03-01 - 2021-03-26
2021-02-02 - 2021-02-26
2021-01-01 - 2021-01-31
2020-12-16 - 2020-12-26
2020-11-03 - 2020-11-27
2020-10-02 - 2020-10-31
2020-09-03 - 2020-09-21
2020-08-07 - 2020-08-26
2020-07-02 - 2020-07-24
2020-06-06 - 2020-06-08
2020-05-01 - 2020-05-12
2020-04-02 - 2020-04-27
2020-03-01 - 2020-03-31
2020-02-04 - 2020-02-25
2020-01-01 - 2020-01-31
2019-12-01 - 2019-12-29
2019-11-02 - 2019-11-17
2019-10-09 - 2019-10-14
2019-09-01 - 2019-09-08
2019-08-01 - 2019-08-24
2019-07-01 - 2019-07-27
2019-06-01 - 2019-06-30
2019-05-04 - 2019-05-29
2019-04-01 - 2019-04-30
2018-01-01 - 2018-01-02
2016-04-14 - 2016-04-20
2015-07-02 - 2015-07-24
2015-06-02 - 2015-06-28
2015-05-01 - 2015-05-31
2015-04-01 - 2015-04-29
2015-03-01 - 2015-03-26
2015-02-01 - 2015-02-28
2015-01-10 - 2015-01-31
 
关于本站 | 广告服务 | 联系我们 | 招聘信息 | 网站导航 | 隐私保护
Copyright (C) 1998-2026. Creaders.NET. All Rights Reserved.