设万维读者为首页 万维读者网 -- 全球华人的精神家园 广告服务 联系我们 关于万维
 
首  页 新  闻 视  频 博  客 论  坛 分类广告 购  物
搜索>> 发表日志 控制面板 个人相册 给我留言
帮助 退出
     
  梦中不知身是客
  本人拥有本博客所有文字和图片版权,未经本人书面许可不得转载。谢谢合作!
网络日志正文
震惊!多伦多大学东亚系即将解散!! 2010-07-13 21:59:17
最近,从多伦多大学传出一个令人震惊的坏消息,该校文理学院院长 Meric Gerler 决定解散该校东亚系,教职员工分别编入其他相关学系。这简直太匪夷所思了!谁能想到,一个国际知名的老牌大学竟然如此短视,出此下策,要毁掉一个好不容易建立起来的东亚系!

多伦多大学始建于1827年,是北美最古老的大学之一,也是世界上最重要的研究型大学之一。东亚研究系的前身是安大略省皇家博物馆 (Royal Ontario Museum) 的远东部 (Far Eastern Department),该博物馆1968年以前一直隶属于多伦多大学。曾在中国河南省任加拿大中华圣公会主教的怀履光 (William C.White) 1934年回到多伦多后成为博物馆远东收藏部 (Far Eastern Collection) 的负责人,并在多伦多大学开设了中国艺术与考古的课程。1968年,多伦多大学评议会授权成立中国研究学院 (School of Chinese Studies),怀履光成为第一任院长。

多伦多大学汇集了一大批中国问题研究学者。该校东亚系经过半个世纪的长足发展,已经形成了比较完备的东亚研究和教学体系。该校的东亚图书馆藏书丰富,资料齐全,在北美名列前茅。随着东亚特别是中国的崛起,东亚系的课程越来越受到欢迎,注册的学生越来越多。按道理说,东亚研究,特别是中国研究应该得到进一步加强 才是,可是没有想到竟然要遭到如此削弱,这于情于理都说不通,谁都没有料到。

目前该系已经向全球学者发出呼吁,请求给与道义上的支持,敦促该校文理学院院长取消这个短视的决定。我在这里也呼吁大家,给予该事件以充分关注,如果可能,请以实际行动表示支持。谢谢!

呼吁信可以写给如下地址,同时用电子邮件发给东亚系主任, Prof. Tom Keirstead tom.keirstead@utoronto.ca
Prof. Meric Gerler, DeanUniversity of TorontoFaculty of Arts  Science
100 St. George Street, Toronto
ON CANADA M5S 3G3
officeofthedean.artsci@utoronto.ca

下面是东亚系韩国研究专业的教授 7月12日发表在H-ASIA的一封呼吁信。遗憾的是,至今仍未见该系中国研究专业教授的任何表示。

July 12 2010
Alert:  Dismantling East Asian Studies at the University of Toronto
****************************************
From: Frank Joseph Shulman
Dear Colleagues,
This may well be of immediate interest to the community of scholars and
students engaged in East Asian Studies throughout North America.
Best wishes,
Frank Joseph Shulman
July 1, 2010
Frank Joseph Shulman
Bibliographer, Editor and Consultant for Reference Publications in Asian
Studies
9225 Limestone Place
College Park, Maryland 20740-3943 (U.S.A.)
E-mail: fshulman@umd.edu
________________________________________
From: koreanstudies-bounces@koreaweb.ws [koreanstudies-bounces@koreaweb.ws]
On Behalf Of Andre Schmid [andre.schmid@utoronto.ca]
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 9:39 AM
To: koreanstudies@koreaweb.ws
Subject: [KS] Request, re: Korean Studies in Toronto
Dear colleagues,
We are writing to you with some unfortunate news concerning institutional
developments at the University of Toronto, developments which threaten the
future of our Korean Studies program. Last week, it was announced that the
Department of East Asian Studies, which provides the core for our graduate
program in Korean Studies, is to be dismantled.  A small part of the
department will be reallocated to a new School of Language and Literature
while the rest of the faculty members will be dispersed among other
disciplinary departments.  This momentous decision was made without prior
notice or consultation, despite its overwhelming importance to many of us in
Toronto.   At a time when the University of Toronto has been able to develop
a vibrant and multi-faceted Korean Studies program, the home of that program
– the Department of East Asian Studies – is about to be eliminated. This, of
course, will have severe repercussions for our growing graduate studies
programme.
We are hoping to reverse this decision and in this struggle are seeking your
support.  Many of us in the department – and especially in the Korean
Studies programme – would appreciate if you assist us in expressing our
opposition to this move by writing a letter to our Dean at the following
address (with an electronic copy for our records to our current interim
Chair, Prof. Tom Keirstead tom.keirstead@utoronto.ca
tom.keirstead@utoronto.ca>).
Prof. Meric Gerler, Dean
University of Toronto
Faculty of Arts & Science
100 St. George Street
Toronto, ON CANADA M5S 3G3
(officeofthedean.artsci@utoronto.ca
officeofthedean.artsci@utoronto.ca>)
We would be most happy to answer any of your questions and would be very
appreciate of your support.
Sincerely,
Juhn Ahn
Kyoungnok Ko
Janet Poole
Andre Schmid
Korean Studies Faculty members,
Dept. of East Asian Studies,
University of Toronto

We would be most happy to answer any of your questions and would be very
appreciate of your support.

Sincerely,
Juhn Ahn
Kyoungnok Ko
Janet Poole
Andre Schmid

Korean Studies Faculty members,
Dept. of East Asian Studies,
University of Toronto

浏览(3772) (0) 评论(16)
发表评论
文章评论
作者:枫苑梦客 留言时间:2010-11-22 19:12:08
好消息!多伦多大学东亚系终于保住了,下面是该系主任的公告。


From: Thomas Keirstead <tom.keirstead@utoronto.ca>

Dear Colleagues,

Earlier this year I wrote to tell you about a proposal that would have seen the end of East Asian Studies as an independent department at the University of Toronto. I'm writing today to let you know that this plan to amalgamate EAS with programs in European languages and literatures in a School of Languages and Literatures has been abandoned. EAS at Toronto will continue as a department. In a memorandum released last week, Dean Meric Gertler announced that "it now seems likely that the Faculty will be able to achieve its academic objectives without proposing the creation of a School, leaving the six units intact as standalone departments/centres." The Provost, in a meeting with the department, confirmed this.

I'd like to take this opportunity to sincerely thank all of you who wrote the dean or otherwise agitated on our behalf; your support was, I think, crucial in convincing the dean of the value of East Asian Studies as a department and discipline.

Tom Keirstead
Interim Chair
Dept of East Asian Studies, University of Toronto
回复 | 0
作者:枫苑梦客 留言时间:2010-07-18 15:35:04
本人很愿意站在全球化的角度理解这次文理学院院长强行关闭东亚系,但是,我看不出多大五年计划中“亚洲重点”和“全球化”有什么冲突之处。为了“全球化” 就应该把学有所专的学者分散开来不成?他们聚在一起就没有“全球化”眼光了?再说节省经费,东亚系现有一千名学生入读本科和研究生的硕士、博士课程。仅东 亚系一个系的学生,就相当于另外四个面临被合并语系学生的总和。现在选修东亚语言文学等专业的学生人数越来越多,每年秋季入学时,学生都要在东亚系的楼道 里大排长龙,参加约见,希望能够注册到自己喜欢的课程。另外,校方做出解散某些科系的决定,通常都是因为某些科系入学人数不足,但东亚系的情况显然并非如 此。一千多学生,光学费就够养这个系了,更别提外界捐款了。东亚系作为北美最大的东亚研究机构之一,关了这个系不仅会对多大的声誉造成损害,更会造成长远 的经济损失。所以我说,这是一个目光短浅的愚蠢的决定。

最近,中文媒体纷纷报道了多伦多大学欲强行关闭东亚系的举措。下面是几篇报纸报道的链接:

多大擬砍東亞研究系逾900師生簽名反對

星岛日报:
http://news.singtao.ca/toronto/2010-07-15/headline1279183583d2606480.html

http://news.singtao.ca/toronto/2010-07-15/headline1279183575d2606479.html

明报:
http://www.mingpaotor.com/htm/News/20100717/tba1.htm

世界日报:
http://74.208.68.62/wjepaperlogin/showpaper.aspx?20100716
在 A15 城市部分
回复 | 0
作者:枫苑梦客 留言时间:2010-07-17 12:32:16
下面是多大东亚系见习主任 Tom Keirstead 今天在 H-Asia 上发给全球东亚学者的呼吁信,把事情的来龙去脉和影响解释得很清楚。

H-ASIA
July 17 2010

Closing of EAS Department at University of Toronto
************************************
From: Thomas Keirstead <tom.keirstead@utoronto.ca>

Dear Colleagues,
You may have noted an announcement from the Koreanists at the University of Toronto, calling attention to plans to close the department of East Asian Studies here. Please forgive the potential duplication, but I'd like to stress that the prospect of "disestablishment" affects all of us who research and teach East Asia. We've prepared some information and a call for help.

Thank you,
Tom Keirstead
Interim Chair, Interim Department of East Asian Studies, University of Toronto

Background

On Wednesday, June 23, Prof. Meric Gertler, Dean of the Faculty of Arts and Science at the University of Toronto, announced to the chairs of the Departments of East Asian Studies, German, Italian, Slavic, and Spanish & Portuguese, that their departments would be dissolved and consolidated into a new School of Languages and Literatures (SLL). The following Monday, the Centre for Comparative Literature was added to the programs to be closed and relocated.

These closures and the formation of the new School are among the recommendations contained in an academic plan for the Faculty of Arts and Science meant to cover the next five years. The formulation of the academic plan began last fall, when the Dean’s office called upon all units in the Faculty to submit their own plans for the five-year period. Context for these plans was supplied by a document<
http://www.artsci.utoronto.ca/faculty-staff/academic-planning/cpad-info/pdfs/2009-2010/context-directions.pdf>
issued by the Dean in October. A nine-member Strategic Planning Committee<
http://www.artsci.utoronto.ca/faculty-staff/academic-planning/cpad-info/pdfs/2009-2010/19-2009-10.pdf> (SPC) headed by the Dean and composed of members of the Dean’s office and
representatives of the faculty was struck to evaluate the units’submissions. This committee met, without further input or consultation,throughout the Winter and Spring, finally delivering its recommendations on July 14, as the Faculty of Arts & Science Academic Plan, 2010-2015 <http://www.artsci.utoronto.ca/faculty-staff/academic-planning/pdfs/linked-fas-academic-plan-14-07-10.pdf>.
Crucial details, however, are available only in the ndividual responses sent to departments by the SPC in late June; these have not been made public.

What is EAS?

We are a department of about 15 members, whose specialties cover East Asian literature, history, thought, and religion. Home to nearly 1000 majors,minors, and specialists, EAS operates one of the largest undergraduate programs in the Faculty. We enjoy robust enrollments in all of our courses,
and, with some two-thirds of our majors or East Asian heritage, especially serve the large Asian community in Toronto and throughout Canada.

What the Academic Plan Means

1. The Department of East Asian Studies will be dissolved. Members of the department who are not specialists in languages and literature will be reassigned to other units. The University of Toronto will lose its only unit dedicated to teaching and researching the great humanistic traditions of
East Asia, and the university will become the only major research institution in North America that does not have an autonomous department of East Asian Studies. The U of T will have an institutional profile in this important field more appropriate for a small liberal arts college, not a
world leader in research in the humanities.

1. Existing students will have difficulty finding courses to meet graduation requirements, and future students who might want to study East Asian languages and cultures in an integrated program will not be able to do so. They will have to cobble together a program of study from the occasional
offerings of a number of departments.

1. Donors will not be able to invest in the development of a program in East Asian humanities. With East Asianists scattered across a number of departments, there will be no institutional focus tied to a strong teaching program. Already, major donors have expressed strong reservations, calling the proposed school a “setback” in our efforts to nurture a new generation of East Asian experts.

1. The proposed school imposes an artificial and Eurocentric division on the study of East Asian humanities. Literature in the East Asian context encompasses history and philosophy and religion, as well as the imaginative texts commonly labeled ‘literature’ in the West. Divorcing the study of East Asian languages and literature from the study of East Asian history,religion, philosophy, and other arts, the Dean’s plans will harm the study of all aspects of the humanities.

What you can do to help

1. Support out students. EAS students have formed a facebook group and posted information about their efforts:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=140492929295640 or
http://saveeastasianstudies.wordpress.com <http://saveeastasianstudies.wordpress.com/>. They have also set up an online petition that anyone who shares our concerns about the future of East Asian Studies can sign: http://www.petitiononline.com/saveeas/petition.html.

1. Write a letter to our dean. We would be very grateful for expressions of support from our colleagues in the field of East Asian Studies as we protest the dean’s decision on the future of our department. If you feel inclined to support us, please send letters, preferably on institutional
letterhead, to:

Prof. Meric Gertler
Dean, Faculty of Arts & Science
University of Toronto
100 St. George Street
Toronto, ON CANADA M5S 3G3
(officeofthedean.artsci@utoronto.ca<mailto:
officeofthedean.artsci@utoronto.ca>)

with a copy (electronic is fine) me:

Tom Keirstead
East Asian Studies
130 St. George St., Room 14087
Toronto ON M5S 3H1
(tom.keirstead@utoronto.ca<mailto:tom.keirstead@utoronto.ca>)
回复 | 0
作者:枫苑梦客 留言时间:2010-07-16 10:46:15
Chronicle of Higher Education 7月13号发表了一篇文章,专门讨论了多伦多大学学科重组的问题。在随后的讨论中,该校文理学院院长Meric Gertler 发表了一个类似声明的东西。放在一起读,可以更明白一些事情的来龙去脉。

Faced with a ballooning deficit, the University of Toronto plans to close its internationally renowned Centre for Comparative Literature, which was founded by the iconic literary critic Northrop Frye. It would also downsize or eliminate several other entities in the humanities and amalgamate most language departments into a new school.

"We had to take a hard look at everything," said Meric Gertler, dean of the Faculty of Arts and Science and chair of the Strategic Planning Committee that is proposing major changes in its impending five-year plan. "It's time to move around the furniture a bit. A number of departments and units are quite small, so, by restructuring and amalgamating, we can save significantly on overheads."

Students and professors have expressed shock and dismay, especially at the proposal to close down the literature center that Mr. Frye created more than 40 years ago. It is a graduate school that has attracted hundreds of international scholars to the campus. Current students would remain part of the center under the restructuring plan, but professors and future students would become part of a new School of Languages and Literatures.

"I'm very concerned about the graduate students," said Neil ten Kortenaar, the center's director, who wrote a strongly worded letter to the administration warning that Toronto's reputation will take a hit, along with its intellectual credibility, and predicting there will be a loss of scholars. "Comparative literature attracts some of the most engaged, most interesting students at the university. They work in different languages, in very different fields, and you might think they would have little to say to each other. But because they have comparison in common, they actually find a lot of common ground."

Letters of Protest
Mr. Frye, the critic and author of The Great Code: The Bible and Literature who died in 1991, made the university one of the premier, if not the best, places for studying critical theory. Letter-writing campaigns and petitions are under way to try to prevent the closure, but the center's survival is unlikely, said Mr. Gertler, the dean. "Yes, it's sad to see it go, but Frye's legacy will continue," he said. "What was revolutionary or radical in the 60s has become embedded in the mainstream."

The center's doctoral students are particularly worried, especially over what the closure may do to their employment prospects. "It's scary and even more so when you look at the attitude trends against the humanities," said Rachel Stapleton, one of the students who has organized a protest Web site. "It's scary to think that this is the attitude of the university toward the humanities."

English and French would remain as departments, but other languages would become part of the School of Languages and Literatures. Ricardo Sternberg, a professor in the Spanish and Portuguese department, says the problem is in the lack of details about how the school will function. "Our problem is not knowing how it's going to run. The devil will be in the details."

More will be known later this week when the five-year plan is officially released. The unveiling will be followed by a series of meetings.

Fears of Loss of Prestige
Professors in the East Asian-studies department worry that the proposal would require them to take a backward step. Their department teaches more than language, they point out, and, with 1,000 major and minor students, it is probably the largest of its kind in North America. A letter to the administration from Thomas Keirstead, interim chair designate, posted on one of the Facebook sites, says that the move would adversely affect East Asian studies' recruiting and reputation.

Toronto's changes to its language departments come amid some concerns over what's happening to programs in the United States.

Linda Hutcheon, a former president of the Modern Language Association who earned the first Ph.D. granted by the center, in 1975, said in an e-mail message that other colleges' experiences make her fear what may come next. "The flourishing individual language departments that will be united in the new school will now compete with each other for resources; in many other institutions, this has meant a gradual atrophy of the study of languages," she wrote. "We understand the economic realities of difficult times but fear this is too drastic a measure for a university that has always cared deeply about its fine reputation in the humanities."

该校文理学院院长Meric Gertler 的声明

17. universityoftoronto - July 16, 2010 at 09:54 am

Contrary to the impression conveyed by your article, the humanities are strong and healthy at the University of Toronto. Much of our reputation is deservedly based on the excellence of our humanities scholarship. The humanities are the heart and soul of the University of Toronto, and will remain so in the future.

The University of Toronto is facing the same financial pressures that are being felt today by all publicly supported universities, and the Faculty of Arts & Science has had to develop a strategy to respond to its financial challenges. At the same time, respected peers reviewed the Faculty in 2008, and advised that we reduce the number of administrative units in light of our increasingly constrained resources.

Our planning process has directed equal scrutiny to all units within the Faculty. As a result, our proposals to restructure existing units, identify resources for redeployment towards more pressing needs, and require undergraduate teaching from graduate-only units are distributed across all three sectors of the Faculty: humanities, social sciences and sciences.

Moreover, the benefits accruing to humanities units in the first wave of commitments arising from our plan will be very similar to those flowing to social science and science units. We have already committed 19 new faculty positions to humanities units, and more than $3.4 million in base budget resources to support teaching and research. Over the full five years of the plan, our forecasts indicate that additional new appointments in the humanities will most likely exceed those flowing to science and social science units by a substantial margin. These commitments are in addition to the $60 million the Faculty has already contributed to support the establishment of the Jackman Humanities Institute, our flagship interdisciplinary humanities centre. Finally, we have recently implemented changes to the undergraduate curriculum which ensure that even more of our students undertake study in the humanities.

Sincerely,

Meric Gertler
Dean, Faculty of Arts & Science
University of Toronto
回复 | 0
作者:枫苑梦客 留言时间:2010-07-16 10:38:45
明惑,
同好啊,同行啊,同病相怜啊。问好!
回复 | 0
作者:明惑 留言时间:2010-07-15 20:32:10
哈,枫苑是东亚系毕业生?我也是美国一大学东亚系毕业。想来这里相似背景的人还不少。。。
回复 | 0
作者:枫苑梦客 留言时间:2010-07-14 20:28:55
昭君,

多伦多大学面临严重经济困难,但是,并不会随便解雇人,而是通过采取鼓励提前退休等措施的达到自然减员的目的。明年将有一大批人员退休,因为提前退休的 package 是2008年6月经济危机前制定的,相当优厚,过了明年6月就要重新谈判,待遇肯定要差很多,所以很多人便选择提前退休。

文理学院这次动作是一次校内重组,不会解雇人,尤其是教授。但是,据说有些教授已经开始动作,寻找更好的雇主了;东亚系的学生也扬言,将转往其他学校。所以,无论从哪个角度讲,这个动作都是对该校东亚研究的一大打击。
回复 | 0
作者:枫苑梦客 留言时间:2010-07-14 20:19:46
信济兄、涂仙兄,
作为多大东亚系的毕业生,对那里有一定感情,当然不希望一个有着五十年历史的老系被突然解散,希望尽力帮一把。但是,如果事情没有转圜的可能,恐怕也只好接受事实了。如果硬要从政治角度解读,首先也是由于东亚系内部的政治斗争才导致了被解散,有点自作自受,但愿他们能从中吸取教训。
回复 | 0
作者:昭君 留言时间:2010-07-14 20:18:45
So it's more of a restructuring or consolidation of departments, not actually closing of programs and departments? Then it is not as bad as I first imagined it to be. At least I hope the faculty positions will be saved?
回复 | 0
作者:2cents 留言时间:2010-07-14 18:55:37
I won't comment on whether or not there were underlying "anti-Chinese" undertones in the closing, but just for the record wish to point out that the closure affects the following departments:

Italian, German, East Asian Studies, Spanish. Portuguese, and Slavic Languages

as well as the afore-mentioned Centre for Comparative Literature.

Again let me re-iterate, I am not happy that this is happening, but I don't know why one should not accept the reasons given for consolidating these departments into the new School of Languages and Literatures.

The University also says no teaching jobs will be lost as a result of the consolidation.
回复 | 0
作者:信济 留言时间:2010-07-14 16:50:43
我真的是完全不能同意涂仙兄的解释。如枫苑兄所言,内部打斗那么多年,财政困难也不是一天两天了,偏这时候砍,连个警告都不给,纯粹的财政解释是不能服人的。
政治正确分两种:公开的和私下的。公开的政治正确要求不能光砍东亚系,否则目标太明显,难以交代;私下的政治正确要求打压华人民族势力,限制其与中国作文化联络的自由,所以砍东亚系正好可以把多年来一直混乱的这个东亚文化中心分散缩编后重新纳入掌控,以免被“外国政府”渗透。逻辑上清清楚楚。
不过涂仙兄给出的公开政治解释也有意义,就是使本来就如一盘散沙的华人移民们更无话可说,从而不得不接受这种打压。如果类似的事情出在美国、对应的是黑人文化,成规模的抗议早就开始了。华人不抱团、甘心忍耐是一方面,对英美文化中的小伎俩不熟悉、迷信“普世”宣传是另一方面。
回复 | 0
作者:2cents 留言时间:2010-07-14 14:15:03
It’s very unfortunate but this has been coming for some time. The U of T’s Arts and Science Faculty has a $55 million debt which it must pare down. Contrary to what 信济 may be surmising, it has nothing to do with the recent controversy about foreign government influence-peddling. For instance another casualty is the renowned Centre for Comparative Literature founded by Canadian literary icon Northrop Frye.

It is a crying shame, nonetheless, that the Department of East Asian Studies is unable to continue on its own. It and several departments will be merged into the new Munk School of Global Affairs, so it will have a new incarnation.

So it’s not good news, but also not all bad news.
回复 | 0
作者:枫苑梦客 留言时间:2010-07-14 14:03:35
信济兄,

本不想对此事过分解读,毕竟并非中国研究一个专业,但是难说没有歧视意味。多伦多大学大管理层相当保守,这回给出的理由是该系无法管理,无法控制。但是,中、日、韩三个仇家的研究者聚在一处,互不服气,甚至互相拆台,告来告去,也不是一天两天了。 五十年都过来了,这时候连个警告都不给,突然就要一锅端了,有点不近人情。这样可能并不能省出多少钱,而影响却是很恶劣的。
回复 | 0
作者:信济 留言时间:2010-07-14 10:56:02
这种事情凡遇经济困难在美国都很常见,只是像加拿大这样的重税国家,大学全公立,而首屈一指的多大还要出此下策,甚至事先不能给一个警告和另择,却十分奇怪,不能不让人怀疑有政治因素在内。最近不是那个安全局长在讲议员被外国政府影响乃至操控的事吗?然后就有行动了。嘿嘿,白人主流的小伎俩。谁让你孔子学院到处建呢?还搞“间谍活动”!
加拿大这样的小国,没有见识、甘心被美国摆布是正常的,不正常的是不少加拿大华人还总是满足于数典忘祖,不知危机之将至。前些天2centsworth有篇文章讲加拿大有人预测若干年后华人将成为第一大种族,我就说这外推法靠不住,因为一旦威胁到白人主流,小伎俩就会出台了,借口从来都不难找,嘿嘿。
回复 | 0
作者:枫苑梦客 留言时间:2010-07-14 07:36:44
Zhaojun,

Thanks for your concern. It is indeed shocking. The main reason given by the dean is that the department is a "unmanageable and uncontrolable unit", but the underlying reason is the budget problem, the Faculty of Arts and Science has a huge deficit and tries to save money by dismantling several departments. the EAS department is only one of them.
回复 | 0
作者:昭君 留言时间:2010-07-14 04:30:02
This is indeed shocking! What is the main reason given by the Dean to dissolve this program?? Budget problems? Or could it be political consideration?
回复 | 0
我的名片
枫苑梦客
注册日期: 2009-05-01
访问总量: 4,863,541 次
点击查看我的个人资料
Calendar
我的公告栏
版权声明
最新发布
· 悲情英雄汉尼拔
· 彭建邦躺枪 选民不上当
· 穆斯林女孩报假案,谭耕先生机会
· 王沪宁:从御用化妆师到意识形态
· 我的2017:寻根之年
· 习特“海湖会晤”意义深远
· M-103动议通过,警钟长鸣,加拿
友好链接
· 落基山人:落基山人的博客
· pumbaa:【PUMBAA 说故事】
· 德孤:德孤的小岛
· 高伐林:老高的博客
· 史语:史语的博客
· 多思:多思的博客
· 阿妞不牛:阿妞不牛的博客
· 牛北村:洛山夜话
· 星辰的翅膀:星辰的翅膀
· 沁霈:沁霈的博客
· 刘以栋:刘以栋的博客
· 欧阳峰:欧阳峰的blog
· 凡平:凡平的博客
· 百草园:百草园
· 虔谦:虔谦:天涯咫尺
· 椰子:椰风阵阵,思绪如河
· 山哥:山哥的文化广场
· 昭君:昭君的博客
分类目录
【2009年中国之行】
· 故乡行(之三)
· 故乡行(之二)
· 故乡行(之一)
· 北京奥林匹克主题公园一日游
· 北京游
· “桑间濮上”话濮阳
· 安阳殷墟之游
· 回国旅行日记 Day Seven
· 回国旅行日记 Day Six
· 回国旅行日记 Day Five
【杂谈】
· 穆斯林女孩报假案,谭耕先生机会
· 王沪宁:从御用化妆师到意识形态
· 卡斯特罗去世,古巴向何处去?
· 江曾倒习政变流产记
· 叙利亚难民问题:困境与出路(三
· 叙利亚难民问题:困境与出路 (
· 叙利亚难民问题:困境与出路 (
· 毛偶像建得再高又有何用?
· 追踪圣诞老的童心
· 庞贝城的覆灭
【婚姻家庭】
· 我的2017:寻根之年
· 放飞小卫星!
· 同性婚姻合法化之我见
· 这年头我们怎样做父亲?
· 中国弃婴,寻找真爱
· “食色性也”、婚姻、换偶及其他
· 网婚与当代中国婚恋观的畸变
· 女性的第二次解放:女人回家去
· 女士们,你们到底想要什么样的中
【政论】
· 彭建邦躺枪 选民不上当
· 习特“海湖会晤”意义深远
· 加拿大保守党党魁选举,我为什么
· 川普就职,一个新孤立主义时代开
· 卡斯特罗去世,古巴向何处去?
· 川普上台与美国进步主义的终结
· 美国大选、全球化与西方文明的终
· 《行尸走肉》、川普现象与美国后
· 川普有没有资格当总统?
· 李克强能否咸鱼翻身?
【人生感悟】
· 父亲节说父亲的责任
· 久在樊笼里,复得返自然:读梭罗
· 北大32楼,我们永远的记忆
· 鸟儿母爱也深沉
· 人生多选择,如何避免“布里丹选
· 人生钟形曲线,你在哪一段?
· 家园何处?
· 面朝大海,春暖花开--春天的追忆
· 新年祈愿
· 加拿大秋日即景
【信仰探讨】
· 平安夜,圣善夜!愿平安常住你心
· 送别李天恩老弟兄
· 胡石根如何 “颠覆国家政权”?
· 圣诞节礼物你收到没有?
· 我看远志明“致教会弟兄姐妹的信”
· 永恒的答问:从姚贝娜之死说起
· 基督教与罗马帝国的兴亡(四)
· 基督教与罗马帝国的兴亡(三)
· 基督教与罗马帝国的兴亡(二)
· 基督教与罗马帝国的兴亡(一)
【吹枫】
· 彭建邦躺枪 选民不上当
· M-103动议通过,警钟长鸣,加拿
· 加拿大保守党党魁选举,我为什么
· 加东海洋三省游记
· 今年庭院种植盘点
· 小土豆国会施暴,接下来会是什么
· 加拿大原住民的困境与出路
· 叙利亚难民问题:困境与出路(三
· 叙利亚难民问题:困境与出路 (
· 盘点2015,展望2016
【教育】
· 加拿大原住民的困境与出路
· 悲剧!中国留学生持刀伤人
· 美国人说不说Out of question?
· 周其凤校长,您走好!
· 与其撒钱办孔子学院,不如设立中
· 普林斯顿素描
· 美国大学生如何看中国?
· 中国留学生造假谁笑了?
· 中国留学生正在冲击美国大学校园
· 堕落的北大,我为你叹息
【健康】
· 道一声珍重啊,老班长!
· Zt: 北京:厚德载雾,自强不吸
· 不要相信癌症自愈的神话
· 惜别抗癌美女赵若伊:兼谈癌症自
· 湖滨消夏,归回安息
· 中国的性解放运动将走向何方?
· 孙爱武与数学天才约翰纳什
· 如何预防H1N1-来自医生的忠告
· 认识西班牙流感(病毒类型H1N1)
· 从海归博士自杀谈接纳
【诗歌】
· 海韵:二十年前的思绪翻飞
· 恩师退休寄言三韻
【2017年中国之行】
· 回国:莫谈政治,可能吗?
· 当官不为民做主:从一桩命案看中
· 回老家过年:爆竹、雾霾和红包
【游记】
· 去华盛顿赏樱花
· 湖畔小憩
· 东加勒比畅意游
【翻译作品】
· 神州怨:一个海外毛粉的心路历程
· 神州怨:一个海外毛粉的心路历程
· 神州怨:一个海外毛粉的心路历程
· 神州怨:一个海外毛粉的心路历程
· 神州怨:一个海外毛粉的心路历程
· 神州怨:一个海外毛粉的心路历程
· 神州怨:一位海外毛粉的心路历程
· 神州怨:一位海外毛粉的心路历程
【2013年中国之行】
· 追忆独克宗古城
· 壮哉,虎跳峡!
· 云南行:大理游记
· 云南游记:丽江印象
· 我的中国之行:为父亲祝寿,并感
【历史研究】
· 悲情英雄汉尼拔
· 看一张日军军用地图
· 香港新界“六日战争”揭秘
· 高岗:毛刘权斗的牺牲品
· 毛泽东的乌托邦试验为什么失败?
· 马可波罗到过中国吗?
· 日本人的华夷之辨及其对中国的影
· 蒙古帝国的征服战争(二)
· 蒙古帝国的征服战争(一)
· 最后的蒙古女王
【好文转贴】
· ZT:二战中的一个圣诞夜
· zt: 加国大选:这张选票投给谁?
· 仇和倒台,剑指李源潮?
· 转贴:我的伊斯兰--这是怎么了?
· zt: 吴祚来在习大大文艺座谈会上
· zt: 这个故事,太狡猾了?
· 好文推荐:中国与中国教会访谈录
· zt: 朱自清《春》两会版:有中国
· 燕京大学和校长陆志韦的命运沉浮
· 周末一笑:看咱们的汉字有多么牛
存档目录
2019-01-29 - 2019-01-29
2018-01-05 - 2018-01-25
2017-04-11 - 2017-04-11
2017-03-01 - 2017-03-26
2017-02-09 - 2017-02-23
2017-01-20 - 2017-01-20
2016-12-24 - 2016-12-24
2016-11-07 - 2016-11-27
2016-10-12 - 2016-10-24
2016-09-07 - 2016-09-23
2016-08-04 - 2016-08-04
2016-07-29 - 2016-07-30
2016-06-19 - 2016-06-21
2016-05-06 - 2016-05-31
2016-04-05 - 2016-04-26
2016-03-18 - 2016-03-21
2016-02-02 - 2016-02-23
2016-01-05 - 2016-01-14
2015-12-14 - 2015-12-30
2015-11-01 - 2015-11-21
2015-10-09 - 2015-10-16
2015-09-02 - 2015-09-22
2015-08-03 - 2015-08-31
2015-07-03 - 2015-07-28
2015-06-04 - 2015-06-26
2015-05-27 - 2015-05-27
2015-04-08 - 2015-04-29
2015-03-02 - 2015-03-30
2015-02-13 - 2015-02-24
2015-01-01 - 2015-01-29
2014-12-07 - 2014-12-31
2014-11-02 - 2014-11-25
2014-10-06 - 2014-10-28
2014-09-04 - 2014-09-30
2014-08-06 - 2014-08-27
2014-07-15 - 2014-07-29
2014-06-03 - 2014-06-26
2014-05-06 - 2014-05-23
2014-04-04 - 2014-04-29
2014-03-11 - 2014-03-29
2014-02-05 - 2014-02-27
2014-01-02 - 2014-01-31
2013-12-03 - 2013-12-28
2013-11-06 - 2013-11-27
2013-10-02 - 2013-10-07
2013-09-03 - 2013-09-26
2013-08-01 - 2013-08-27
2013-07-03 - 2013-07-29
2013-06-03 - 2013-06-14
2013-05-02 - 2013-05-22
2013-04-02 - 2013-04-27
2013-03-13 - 2013-03-27
2013-02-10 - 2013-02-28
2013-01-05 - 2013-01-31
2012-12-05 - 2012-12-31
2012-11-02 - 2012-11-27
2012-10-08 - 2012-10-30
2012-09-03 - 2012-09-27
2012-08-02 - 2012-08-31
2012-07-01 - 2012-07-27
2012-06-02 - 2012-06-24
2012-05-03 - 2012-05-29
2012-04-06 - 2012-04-18
2012-03-04 - 2012-03-26
2012-02-05 - 2012-02-15
2012-01-01 - 2012-01-29
2011-12-01 - 2011-12-27
2011-11-10 - 2011-11-22
2011-09-06 - 2011-09-24
2011-08-08 - 2011-08-24
2011-07-01 - 2011-07-20
2011-06-05 - 2011-06-21
2011-05-04 - 2011-05-31
2011-04-07 - 2011-04-24
2011-03-06 - 2011-03-28
2011-02-03 - 2011-02-24
2011-01-05 - 2011-01-29
2010-12-02 - 2010-12-28
2010-11-03 - 2010-11-29
2010-10-07 - 2010-10-26
2010-09-03 - 2010-09-27
2010-08-08 - 2010-08-18
2010-07-07 - 2010-07-25
2010-06-06 - 2010-06-27
2010-05-03 - 2010-05-31
2010-04-02 - 2010-04-30
2010-03-01 - 2010-03-23
2010-02-01 - 2010-02-22
2010-01-01 - 2010-01-28
2009-12-01 - 2009-12-24
2009-11-02 - 2009-11-27
2009-10-02 - 2009-10-30
2009-09-01 - 2009-09-29
2009-08-01 - 2009-08-30
2009-07-23 - 2009-07-30
2009-06-04 - 2009-06-26
2009-05-01 - 2009-05-31
 
关于本站 | 广告服务 | 联系我们 | 招聘信息 | 网站导航 | 隐私保护
Copyright (C) 1998-2024. Creaders.NET. All Rights Reserved.