设万维读者为首页 万维读者网 -- 全球华人的精神家园 广告服务 联系我们 关于万维
 
首  页 新  闻 视  频 博  客 论  坛 分类广告 购  物
搜索>> 发表日志 控制面板 个人相册 给我留言
帮助 退出
 
逸草  
逐梦追虹去 暮归听雨蛙  
网络日志正文
Dan Rather疾呼:现在我们没有人能保持沉默! 2016-11-24 06:44:11

转自“美国华人”

老记者疾呼:现在我们没有人能保持沉默!

Original 2016-11-24 小芬 美国华人

编者按

Dan Rather是退役军人和著名的美国记者,他曾在CBS做晚间新闻的主持人24年,和Peter Jennings及Tom Brokaw被称为美国电视台的三巨头,相信很多朋友对他不陌生。Dan看到目前当选总统放任纳粹主义抬头,内阁候选人令人担忧,他发出了强烈呼声!这篇文章已被转发数万次



Photo courtesy of Charlie Llewellin | Flickr


现在是这样一个时刻,我们没有一个人能够还是坐着不动或沉默不语。我们必须都站立起来,没有人可以置身事外。

历史会询问你是站在哪一边。这不是一个关于政治、党派、甚至
政策的问题,这是一个关于们民主的最基本理念问题,攸关我们法治下的多元民主这个丽实验的根基。

当我看到,在公共场合,在我们国家的首都,新纳粹举手令人恐怖地行礼,向当选总统致敬,我惊恐地颤抖;当我看到对这种行为,当选总统仅仅在一个声明里轻描淡写地加以批评,我内心的愤怒在增长;当我看到有些媒体把他那个轻描淡写的声明当作义正辞严的谴责来报道时,我再也无法控制下去了。


们的独立宣言为我们留下了这些珍贵的基本原则:“们认为这些真理是不言而喻的,人人生而平等,造物者赋予他们若干不可剥夺的权利,其中包括生命权、自由权和追求幸福的权利。

这些真理可能是
不言而喻的,但它们不是自我复制的,每一代都必须重温这些誓言。我们国家是为了反抗一个反复无常的权威君主体制而建立的。我们设立了一些机构,如自由的新闻界和独立的法院系统,以保护我们的脆弱的权利。我们经历了内战和民权运动的血腥阵痛让更多的公民拥有了更多的权利。但是我们的国家航船的方向并不总是一直向前,我们拘禁了日裔美国人,在麦卡锡时代进行了“红色诱钓”动,等等。如今我感觉到复辟狂流再次在我的脚下汹涌而起,但我决心站稳脚跟

在正常的两党总统的交接期,常常一方忐忑难安,而另一方踌躇满志。新闻界通常抱着给新政至少一个机会的态度---所谓蜜月期。但是现在不是一个正常的时代,这不是关于税收,医保或教育 - -即使这些和其他问题的确很重要,这是关于种族主义、偏见,恐吓、和腐败的幽灵。


但是我坚信我不会绝望,因为我相信绝大多数美国人和我站在一起。面对国会两党、面对整个新闻界、面对全国各地的宗教和公民领导人,你的声音必须被他们听到。我希望当选总统能学会看得高一点,看到正在酝酿之中的危险。若他果能如此,并辅以有力的言行,我们准备欢迎他的声音。但是他的顾问和内阁人选似乎表明事态正向相反的方向发展,这使我忧心如焚。


对你们所有人,我想说,保持警惕。伟大的马丁路德金知道,即使作为少数民族,在和暴政作斗争时,人多就是力量。紧握手、向前走,在麻痹大意的喧嚣之上提高你的声音,这样我们就可以移动群山。在现在的情况下,我相信绝大多数人希望看到这个国家继续走在宽容和自由的大道上。但是我们要发出自己的声音。参与到公民政府之中。如果你觉得新闻媒体把极端主义当作常态,不要放过他们,给他们猛打电话,也请捐赠你的宝贵时间和金钱,支持为保卫我们的自由而奋战的事业。

们是一个伟大的国家。我们在过去的生活中渡过了巨大挑战,我们可以也能再做到。但我们不能害怕发言和行动,只有这样,才能确保我们的子孙后代有一个充满希望的未来。



原文:Now is a time when none of us can afford to remain seated or silent

https://goo.gl/so5PzM

作者:Dan Rather

译文:小芬

校对:Paul




本文由作者投稿,内容不代表【美国华人】微信公众号立场。




浏览(1141) (6) 评论(26)
发表评论
文章评论
作者:求真知 留言时间:2016-11-30 15:15:23
(先向一草博致歉和致谢,借用贵宝地多多!) gmuoruo兄,交换至此,我想我们可以“Agree to disagree”。 Dan Rather 被CBS逼辞固然是“铁板钉钉”的历史事实,但却一丁点儿不能说明究竟内幕如何。“替罪羊”或“舍车保帅”是历史上永远的戏目。 Killian documents虽然被证实是伪造的,这是否是个设局并没有被任何人肯定或否定。尽管如此,文件所提出的小布希在National Guard受到一些特殊对待,例如未完成训练要求等等,现在都证明是“铁板钉钉”事实存在的,我就在这里再引一次的: Bush had completed five years, four months, and five days toward his six-year service obligation.In September 2004, Lawrence Korb, an Assistant Secretary of Defense under President Ronald Reagan, after reviewing the payroll records for Bush's last two years of service, concluded that they indicated that Bush did not fulfill his obligations and could have been ordered to active duty as a result. 至于是不是Dan Rather 未经查证就报道,请看下面的段落: CBS investigations prior to airing the segment[edit]Mapes and her colleagues began interviewing people who might be able to corroborate the information in the documents, while also retaining four forensic document experts, Marcel J. Matley, James J. Pierce, Emily Will, and Linda James, to determine the validity of the memos.On September 5, CBS interviewed Killian's friend Robert Strong, who ran the Texas Air National Guard administrative office. Among other issues covered in his interview with Rather and Mapes, Strong was asked if he thought the documents were genuine. Strong stated, "they are compatible with the way business was done at the time. They are compatible with the man that I remember Jerry Killian being."[37] Strong had first seen the documents twenty minutes earlier and also said he had no personal knowledge of their content;[38] he later claimed he had been told to assume the content of the documents was accurate.[39]On September 6, CBS interviewed General Robert "Bobby" Hodges, a former officer at the Texas Air National Guard and Killian's immediate superior at the time. Hodges declined CBS' request for an on-camera interview, and Mapes read the documents to him over the telephone. According to Mapes, Hodges agreed with CBS's assessment that the documents were real, and CBS reported that Hodges stated that these were "the things that Killian had expressed to me at the time."[40] However, according to Hodges, when Mapes read portions of the memos to him he simply stated, "well if he wrote them, that's what he felt," and he claims he never confirmed the validity of the content of the documents. General Hodges later asserted to the investigatory panel that he told Mapes that Killian had never, to his knowledge, ordered anyone to take a physical and that he had never been pressured regarding Lieutenant Bush, as the documents alleged.[41] Hodges also claims that when CBS interviewed him, he thought the memos were handwritten, not typed,[42] and following the September 8 broadcast, when Hodges had seen the documents and heard of claims of forgery by Killian's wife and son, he was "convinced they were not authentic" and told Rather and Mapes on September 10.[43] Dan Rather在CBS前后共43年包括24年CBS Evening News 主播,多次获 Emmy Awards, Peabody Awards, 和若干大学荣誉学位,如果他真是不称职的,恐怕连2年4个月也做不下来! 对重要事件的报道是媒体人义不容辞的责任,不能因为报道可能对某一政党或公职人员有负面影响就认为是故意跟他们过不去甚至恶意攻击。例如Dan Rather对Abu Ghraib的非法非人道的酷刑的报道就不能说是跟小布希过不去吧?

回复 | 0
作者:求真知 留言时间:2016-11-30 15:15:06
(先向一草博致歉和致谢,借用贵宝地多多!) gmuoruo兄,交换至此,我想我们可以“Agree to disagree”。 Dan Rather 被CBS逼辞固然是“铁板钉钉”的历史事实,但却一丁点儿不能说明究竟内幕如何。“替罪羊”或“舍车保帅”是历史上永远的戏目。 Killian documents虽然被证实是伪造的,这是否是个设局并没有被任何人肯定或否定。尽管如此,文件所提出的小布希在National Guard受到一些特殊对待,例如未完成训练要求等等,现在都证明是“铁板钉钉”事实存在的,我就在这里再引一次的: Bush had completed five years, four months, and five days toward his six-year service obligation.In September 2004, Lawrence Korb, an Assistant Secretary of Defense under President Ronald Reagan, after reviewing the payroll records for Bush's last two years of service, concluded that they indicated that Bush did not fulfill his obligations and could have been ordered to active duty as a result. 至于是不是Dan Rather 未经查证就报道,请看下面的段落: CBS investigations prior to airing the segment[edit]Mapes and her colleagues began interviewing people who might be able to corroborate the information in the documents, while also retaining four forensic document experts, Marcel J. Matley, James J. Pierce, Emily Will, and Linda James, to determine the validity of the memos.On September 5, CBS interviewed Killian's friend Robert Strong, who ran the Texas Air National Guard administrative office. Among other issues covered in his interview with Rather and Mapes, Strong was asked if he thought the documents were genuine. Strong stated, "they are compatible with the way business was done at the time. They are compatible with the man that I remember Jerry Killian being."[37] Strong had first seen the documents twenty minutes earlier and also said he had no personal knowledge of their content;[38] he later claimed he had been told to assume the content of the documents was accurate.[39]On September 6, CBS interviewed General Robert "Bobby" Hodges, a former officer at the Texas Air National Guard and Killian's immediate superior at the time. Hodges declined CBS' request for an on-camera interview, and Mapes read the documents to him over the telephone. According to Mapes, Hodges agreed with CBS's assessment that the documents were real, and CBS reported that Hodges stated that these were "the things that Killian had expressed to me at the time."[40] However, according to Hodges, when Mapes read portions of the memos to him he simply stated, "well if he wrote them, that's what he felt," and he claims he never confirmed the validity of the content of the documents. General Hodges later asserted to the investigatory panel that he told Mapes that Killian had never, to his knowledge, ordered anyone to take a physical and that he had never been pressured regarding Lieutenant Bush, as the documents alleged.[41] Hodges also claims that when CBS interviewed him, he thought the memos were handwritten, not typed,[42] and following the September 8 broadcast, when Hodges had seen the documents and heard of claims of forgery by Killian's wife and son, he was "convinced they were not authentic" and told Rather and Mapes on September 10.[43] Dan Rather在CBS前后共43年包括24年CBS Evening News 主播,多次获 Emmy Awards, Peabody Awards, 和若干大学荣誉学位,如果他真是不称职的,恐怕连2年4个月也做不下来! 对重要事件的报道是媒体人义不容辞的责任,不能因为报道可能对某一政党或公职人员有负面影响就认为是故意跟他们过不去甚至恶意攻击。例如Dan Rather对Abu Ghraib的非法非人道的酷刑的报道就不能说是跟小布希过不去吧?

回复 | 0
作者:求真知 留言时间:2016-11-30 15:11:08
(先向一草博致歉和致谢,借用贵宝地多多!) gmuoruo兄,交换至此,我想我们可以“Agree to disagree”。 Dan Rather 被CBS逼辞固然是“铁板钉钉”的历史事实,但却一丁点儿不能说明究竟内幕如何。“替罪羊”或“舍车保帅”是历史上永远的戏目。 Killian documents虽然被证实是伪造的,这是否是个设局并没有被任何人肯定或否定。尽管如此,文件所提出的小布希在National Guard受到一些特殊对待,例如未完成训练要求等等,现在都证明是“铁板钉钉”事实存在的,我就在这里再引一次的: Bush had completed five years, four months, and five days toward his six-year service obligation.In September 2004, Lawrence Korb, an Assistant Secretary of Defense under President Ronald Reagan, after reviewing the payroll records for Bush's last two years of service, concluded that they indicated that Bush did not fulfill his obligations and could have been ordered to active duty as a result. 至于是不是Dan Rather 未经查证就报道,请看下面的段落: CBS investigations prior to airing the segment[edit]Mapes and her colleagues began interviewing people who might be able to corroborate the information in the documents, while also retaining four forensic document experts, Marcel J. Matley, James J. Pierce, Emily Will, and Linda James, to determine the validity of the memos.On September 5, CBS interviewed Killian's friend Robert Strong, who ran the Texas Air National Guard administrative office. Among other issues covered in his interview with Rather and Mapes, Strong was asked if he thought the documents were genuine. Strong stated, "they are compatible with the way business was done at the time. They are compatible with the man that I remember Jerry Killian being."[37] Strong had first seen the documents twenty minutes earlier and also said he had no personal knowledge of their content;[38] he later claimed he had been told to assume the content of the documents was accurate.[39]On September 6, CBS interviewed General Robert "Bobby" Hodges, a former officer at the Texas Air National Guard and Killian's immediate superior at the time. Hodges declined CBS' request for an on-camera interview, and Mapes read the documents to him over the telephone. According to Mapes, Hodges agreed with CBS's assessment that the documents were real, and CBS reported that Hodges stated that these were "the things that Killian had expressed to me at the time."[40] However, according to Hodges, when Mapes read portions of the memos to him he simply stated, "well if he wrote them, that's what he felt," and he claims he never confirmed the validity of the content of the documents. General Hodges later asserted to the investigatory panel that he told Mapes that Killian had never, to his knowledge, ordered anyone to take a physical and that he had never been pressured regarding Lieutenant Bush, as the documents alleged.[41] Hodges also claims that when CBS interviewed him, he thought the memos were handwritten, not typed,[42] and following the September 8 broadcast, when Hodges had seen the documents and heard of claims of forgery by Killian's wife and son, he was "convinced they were not authentic" and told Rather and Mapes on September 10.[43] Dan Rather在CBS前后共43年包括24年CBS Evening News 主播,多次获 Emmy Awards, Peabody Awards, 和若干大学荣誉学位,如果他真是不称职的,恐怕连2年4个月也做不下来! 对重要事件的报道是媒体人义不容辞的责任,不能因为报道可能对某一政党或公职人员有负面影响就认为是故意跟他们过不去甚至恶意攻击。例如Dan Rather对Abu Ghraib的非法非人道的酷刑的报道就不能说是跟小布希过不去吧?

回复 | 0
作者:求真知 留言时间:2016-11-30 14:56:09
(先向一草博致歉和致谢,借用贵宝地多多!) gmuoruo兄,交换至此,我想我们可以“Agree to disagree”。 Dan Rather 被CBS逼辞固然是“铁板钉钉”的历史事实,但却一丁点儿不能说明究竟内幕如何。“替罪羊”或“舍车保帅”是历史上永远的戏目。 Killian documents虽然被证实是伪造的,这是否是个设局并没有被任何人肯定或否定。尽管如此,文件所提出的小布希在National Guard受到一些特殊对待,例如未完成训练要求等等,现在都证明是“铁板钉钉”事实存在的,我就在这里再引一次的: Bush had completed five years, four months, and five days toward his six-year service obligation.In September 2004, Lawrence Korb, an Assistant Secretary of Defense under President Ronald Reagan, after reviewing the payroll records for Bush's last two years of service, concluded that they indicated that Bush did not fulfill his obligations and could have been ordered to active duty as a result. 至于是不是Dan Rather 未经查证就报道,请看下面的段落: CBS investigations prior to airing the segment[edit]Mapes and her colleagues began interviewing people who might be able to corroborate the information in the documents, while also retaining four forensic document experts, Marcel J. Matley, James J. Pierce, Emily Will, and Linda James, to determine the validity of the memos.On September 5, CBS interviewed Killian's friend Robert Strong, who ran the Texas Air National Guard administrative office. Among other issues covered in his interview with Rather and Mapes, Strong was asked if he thought the documents were genuine. Strong stated, "they are compatible with the way business was done at the time. They are compatible with the man that I remember Jerry Killian being."[37] Strong had first seen the documents twenty minutes earlier and also said he had no personal knowledge of their content;[38] he later claimed he had been told to assume the content of the documents was accurate.[39]On September 6, CBS interviewed General Robert "Bobby" Hodges, a former officer at the Texas Air National Guard and Killian's immediate superior at the time. Hodges declined CBS' request for an on-camera interview, and Mapes read the documents to him over the telephone. According to Mapes, Hodges agreed with CBS's assessment that the documents were real, and CBS reported that Hodges stated that these were "the things that Killian had expressed to me at the time."[40] However, according to Hodges, when Mapes read portions of the memos to him he simply stated, "well if he wrote them, that's what he felt," and he claims he never confirmed the validity of the content of the documents. General Hodges later asserted to the investigatory panel that he told Mapes that Killian had never, to his knowledge, ordered anyone to take a physical and that he had never been pressured regarding Lieutenant Bush, as the documents alleged.[41] Hodges also claims that when CBS interviewed him, he thought the memos were handwritten, not typed,[42] and following the September 8 broadcast, when Hodges had seen the documents and heard of claims of forgery by Killian's wife and son, he was "convinced they were not authentic" and told Rather and Mapes on September 10.[43] Dan Rather在CBS前后共43年包括24年CBS Evening News 主播,多次获 Emmy Awards, Peabody Awards, 和若干大学荣誉学位,如果他真是不称职的,恐怕连2年4个月也做不下来! 对重要事件的报道是媒体人义不容辞的责任,不能因为报道可能对某一政党或公职人员有负面影响就认为是故意跟他们过不去甚至恶意攻击。例如Dan Rather对Abu Ghraib的非法非人道的酷刑的报道就不能说是跟小布希过不去吧?

回复 | 0
作者:gmuoruo 回复 求真知 留言时间:2016-11-26 00:33:43

求真知 博,Dan Rather CBS逼辞职,这是铁板定丁的历史,我的记忆在这个要点上完全无误,但你都还要求我来“提供确凿的证据证明他要负多大的责任“,我怎有办法让人“心服口服”?本文拿 Dan Rather 当权威,但却故意漏掉这件最重要的事,我提醒一下读者就够了。

既然做不到 100% 准确,为何还要把 CBS 的“信用”消费在小布什年轻时代的极毛蒜皮的小事上?小布在 2000 年就已当总统,美国人对他年轻时的事已做判断,Dan Rather 为何四年之后还要穷追不舍?结合 Dan Rather 采访老布什时违背事先约定而突然袭击的事,我说他“更是和布什家有私仇的样子”的推测很合理的。如同推论 CBS,CNN,纽约时报是左媒一样,CBS 从不承认,但明眼人谁不知道?

最后,不管是否反越战,2004 年时小布什的政绩如何,媒体都不应该像共党宣传部那样来编故事,搞臭人的方法来“指导”民众。

以“为了美国和世界的好”当理由来做新闻媒体是极权国家的思维。在自由社会,新闻的职业道德本该是客观报道事件,而非当政委来指导民众。

回复 | 0
作者:求真知 留言时间:2016-11-25 13:53:03

gmuoruo兄,

既然要人心服口服,就应该言出有据,少凭记忆或推想,特别是举手之劳就查得到的事件。您说对不对?

媒体虽然要求公证,事实上谁也做不到100%。您提的这几件事,比如:“Dan Rather 更是和布什家有私仇的样子”,更像是个人推想。

至于“Dan Rather 本人的责任”,如果您能提供确凿的证据证明他要负多大的责任,愿拜读。

反越战,不应该肯定吗?小布希的政绩还有争议吗?CBS在这些事件上如果说有倾向,难道不是为了美国和世界的好吗?

回复 | 0
作者:gmuoruo 回复 求真知 留言时间:2016-11-25 13:18:41

求真知博,事发的具体时间我是凭记忆,显然比我记得的更早,但当时的效果是媒体的注意力一下子都转向小布年轻时的往事, Kerry 的气势大涨。

至于Dan Rather 本人的责任,他是CBS新闻部的领军人物,没有他的热心,底下谁会乱来?这也是为什么事发后他也逼辞职的原因。

你若多了解 CBS 和 Dan Rather 的历史,就知道 CBS 一直是左媒晚间新闻的旗手。Walter Cronkite 的反越战 agenda 对美国在越战时败共产革命有过重大贡献,而 Dan Rather 更是和布什家有私仇的样子,曾在晚间新闻时段采访老布什时违反事先约定,公开他难堪。而小布什的事到了 2004 年早是旧闻,鸡毛蒜皮的事,他还当着党争武器追着不放。

而那些文件的真假极易判断:是用 Microsoft Word 打印出来的。但Rather 虽逼辞,但还是不肯承认文件是伪造的,由此可见他的政治立场对他的新闻职业道德伤害有多深。

回复 | 0
作者:公孙明 留言时间:2016-11-25 09:53:36

民主党过去一二十年间受到幕后操控集团的摆布,用公器购买黑西裔选票进行愚民以夺取政权,胡作非为,彻底变质,才是右派抬头的关键。

回复 | 0
作者:一草 回复 gugeren 留言时间:2016-11-25 08:16:42

“政治正确”这词,自出现到目前为止,有其特定含义。尚不适于作“全靠人们的理解和定义。一个时代有一个时代的“政治正确””这样的扩展,会造成讨论中的概念混乱。

若用“一个时代有一个时代的‘政治正确’”,则须加上“当今时代”、“六十年代”、或“八十年代”的“政治正确”,现还无必要特意引向这样的累赘吧。

回复 | 0
作者:求真知 留言时间:2016-11-24 23:15:20

回gmuoruo兄:

您不会以为Dan Rather 自己一个人准备这个报道吧?CBS这么大个主要电视台,Dan Rather 这个担纲主角,没有一个团队在幕后是不可想象的。怎么应该是Dan Rather一人担全部责任?

The man who delivered the copies, Lt. Col. Bill Burkett, a former officer in the Texas Army National Guard and outspoken Bush critic, claimed that he burned the originals. Burkett admitted lying to CBS and USA Today about where he had obtained the papers and eventually expressed doubts of his own about their authenticity.

CBS播出这条新闻是September 8, 2004,大选是在11月份,这哪里是您说的:“他急忙忙地在大选前几天向全美国公告”?而且在九月20日,CBS就公开承认所报有误,正如有担当的媒体应该做的,离大选还有一个多月!

CBS and Dan Rather initially defended the documents and the report,[63] but on September 20, 2004 less than two months before Election Day, CBS News stated that it had been "misled" and that it could not authenticate the documents and should not have used them.

回复 | 0
作者:gmuoruo 回复 求真知 留言时间:2016-11-24 19:48:55

当然不是他本人制造的,但是他急忙忙地在大选前几天向全美国公告。他骗了没错,但如果不是他愿意被骗,那么低级的假文件能骗谁?

回复 | 0
作者:求真知 留言时间:2016-11-24 19:38:39

回gmuoruo兄:

已经说了,不是他捏造的,也给了连接。您可以移步去看一下吗?

回复 | 0
作者:gugeren 留言时间:2016-11-24 19:37:49

那位神经外科医生、共和党候选人之一Ben Carson被川普任命为住房部部长。他明显是有色人种的后裔:

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/11/ben-carson-may-be-the-perfect-trump-hud-secretary.html

另外,川普还任命了2位女部长。

回复 | 0
作者:gmuoruo 回复 求真知 留言时间:2016-11-24 19:32:53

小布什的Air National Guard的服务文件至今找不全,所以 Dan Rather 就帮忙制造一些在选前几天公布?纽约时报大概是从他那学来的,选前找人来指控川普在头等舱性侵女人。

民主社会该害怕的不是川普,而是丧失职业道德的媒体。

回复 | 0
作者:求真知 留言时间:2016-11-24 19:05:57

Dan Rather 是公认的最杰出的新闻人之一,不是一天两天,而是24年!(如果不计被迫提早退休)。

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Rather

所谓的 Killian documents事件,根本不是Dan Rather捏造的,是否被设计争论至今。如果说对当年的事件不熟悉,随手都可以查到。

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Bush_military_service_controversy

小Bush在Air National Guard的服务文件记录至今找不全。不少他自己说参加过的训练被证明不实。

Bush had completed five years, four months, and five days toward his six-year service obligation.

In September 2004, Lawrence Korb, an Assistant Secretary of Defense under President Ronald Reagan, after reviewing the payroll records for Bush's last two years of service, concluded that they indicated that Bush did not fulfill his obligations and could have been ordered to active duty as a result.

回复 | 0
作者:gugeren 回复 一草 留言时间:2016-11-24 14:42:31

自己的一些想法:

1】那时(《人权法案》公布前)种族歧视还盛行时,人们当然不会真地说,种族歧视就是“政治正确”,因为它不符合美国宪法精神和《独立宣言》“人生来平等”;但是那时人们就是认为白人至上、其他少数族裔低等是正常的,是政治上正确的,特别是在那些以前蓄奴的南方州里。

2】什么是“政治正确”?全靠人们的理解和定义。一个时代有一个时代的“政治正确”,可以完全不一样,甚至完全相反。

3】种族歧视不像服装的流行,过一段时间后,不流行的衣服会再重新复出。种族歧视一旦被唾弃,就永远不得翻身了,就像皇权贵族那样,永远被人们抛弃了。可能人们会对某些具体族裔的个人有一些偏见,但不太会对整个族裔或人群都产生歧视的。估计那些年轻人就是发生这样的种族歧视问题吧?他们还没有那么了解这个世界呢。

4】因此,抽象地谈论政治正确,还不如直接谈论反种族歧视,谈论平等、民主、自由,那样还清楚和容易得多。

回复 | 0
作者:gmuoruo 留言时间:2016-11-24 14:27:25

Dan Rather 的履历一定不能少了 2004 年总统选举前几天造假陷害小布什这最重要的一条,也因此害得 CBS 不得不逼他辞职。

为了政治而丧失职业道德是民主社会最大的危害,也是这次主流左媒被美国选民抛弃的最大原因。

要看看纽约时报的 Jessica Leeds 谎言怎么收场,也许川普宽宏大量,放他们一马?

回复 | 0
作者:无云夜空 留言时间:2016-11-24 14:13:33

歧视会被宣传教育或政治正确遏制,但是目前还无法消除,甚至有抬头,倒退也是正常的。歧视的消除有赖于被歧视民族或种族的复兴、贡献、融合等的成功。

回复 | 0
作者:一草 回复 gugeren 留言时间:2016-11-24 13:13:41

谁都知道有过“白人至上、黑人和少数族裔低等”的年代,离现今不过数十年。可那曾被普遍称为政治正确,还是用的其他名称?

回复 | 0
作者:gugeren 回复 一草 留言时间:2016-11-24 11:53:27

“政治正确这词从出现以来,与“平等民主自由思想的宣传和培植”,基本上是在同道上。”

两者不等于的哦!

理由在下面:

“那时的“政治正确”,反倒是白人至上、黑人和少数族裔低等。”

那时,主张“黑白(人)平等”才是异类;白人主张“黑白平等”也要被同侪觉得是叛徒之类的人。

可以找找反映当时情况的电影和书籍看看。

回复 | 0
作者:一草 回复 gugeren 留言时间:2016-11-24 10:52:53

不指望会有什么能“保证种族歧视现象不出现”。

政治正确这词从出现以来,与“平等民主自由思想的宣传和培植”,基本上是在同道上。

回复 | 0
作者:gugeren 回复 一草 留言时间:2016-11-24 10:39:18

“据悉The Southern Poverty Law Center has received reports of over 700 incidents of harassment with over 40% occurring in K-12 and college settings.”

相信,成年人即使有种族优越感,想弄种族歧视那一套,他/她会知道等待他/她的会是什么结果。

这才是这种问题主要发生在年轻人身上的原因吧?年轻人可能还没有考虑得那么远,那么细。

回复 | 0
作者:gugeren 回复 一草 留言时间:2016-11-24 10:36:09

但是,但是,“政治正确”能保证种族歧视现象不出现?

要保证种族歧视现象不再出现,还是要靠平等民主自由思想的宣传和培植。

证明:

当年马丁路德金他们取得平等权利的胜利,靠得并不是什么“政治正确”。那时的“政治正确”,反倒是白人至上、黑人和少数族裔低等。

回复 | 1
作者:一草 回复 gugeren 留言时间:2016-11-24 09:29:58

难道如今不是反“政治正确”喧嚣尘上?而反种族主义是政治正确的头条。

据悉The Southern Poverty Law Center has received reports of over 700 incidents of harassment with over 40% occurring in K-12 and college settings.

当然我也相信种族主义终难得逞重来。

回复 | 0
作者:gugeren 留言时间:2016-11-24 09:17:26

当然,像Dan Rather那样对种族主义保持警惕是对的,但是也不需要弄到草木皆兵的程度。

回复 | 0
作者:gugeren 留言时间:2016-11-24 09:14:42

应该相信,现在已经不是拘禁日裔美国人的时代,不是麦卡锡时代,也不是黑人当年争取平权运动的时代。

绝大多数的现代美国人,从幼儿园起,就接受平等民主自由精神的熏陶。他们视种族主义为怪物,认为种族主义是人类的天敌。

看吧,时间将证明我的这个结论的正确!

回复 | 0
我的名片
一草
注册日期: 2016-07-29
访问总量: 7,248,340 次
点击查看我的个人资料
Calendar
我的公告栏
本博客原创文章版权属作者所有, 未经许可不得转载。
最新发布
· 将停博数周/一组趣帖/普帝助川
· 金家奢华绿皮列车揭密/9.13俄乌
· 毛党文化之害空前绝后/毛的力量
· 宝像雄文 何其眼熟?/苏梅战役:40
· 911,永恒的纪念/乌发布反攻成果
· 带鱼被送带鱼/美越联合声明全文
· 越迎拜登 人山人海/俄乌战争进程
友好链接
· 马黑:马黑的博客
· 瑞典茉莉:瑞典茉莉的博客
· 一冰:一冰的博客
· 和谈:和谈的博客
· 渔阳山人:醉茶说天下
· cunliren:cunliren的博客
· 南来客:南来客的博客
· 安雅云:安雅云的博客
· 天宝:天宝的博客
· 山城兄弟:山城兄弟
分类目录
【中华大地】
· 毛党文化之害空前绝后/毛的力量
· 宝像雄文 何其眼熟?/苏梅战役:40
· 带鱼被送带鱼/美越联合声明全文
· 一组图文尽显赵国怪象 / 华为的
· 秦剧出新幕-罪名升级/俄曾严重渗
· 今年怪事特别多+评论/被删文:关
· 内蒙铀泄露事件严重/麒麟性能只
· 日经传习大发不满/邓此举该当何
· 看台陆哪方把民当人看?/日侵略过
· 盛传的水淹七军消息/九二受降图/
【美国政治经济科学历史】
· 将停博数周/一组趣帖/普帝助川
· 911,永恒的纪念/乌发布反攻成果
· 看蒋耄后人/蒋万安带来危机意识?
· 拜总这老头不简单/有关今枪杀导
· 奥本海默的疑惑:原子彈真的非丟
· 赵国问题在经济 根子在政治/反AA
· 还原中美合作所真相/川普令GOP陷
· 为何不少华一代恨白左仇视非移?/
· 华北几个蓄滞洪区/川粉大选后遗
· 洪水肆虐 不见伟领/川明知故犯法
【人在北美】
· 为何不少华一代恨白左仇视非移?/
· 华女购物遭歧视,抗争获道歉|族裔
· 一家五口都染新冠的经过体会--结
· 感恩感人好事好文:错发的短信和
· 反对川党祸美祸害女性:全美女性
· 小区里有一支送温暖的小树苗队-
· 我姐家人染疫的经历--兼评网友“
· 川党大选下台后,不少华裔反川群
· 美苗族少女苏妮李体操全能封后 |
· 华川竟在国会骚乱前成了为骄傲男
【人生旅途】
· 1972年:美国教授在中国的"
· 周末看老家街门口:上海网红马路-
· 就地过年之今昔/家门前白雪皑皑,
· 一梦一人生,“美帝孤儿”母亲的传
· 二〇二〇三幸/祝众网友群友新年
· 母亲的故事丨張大青:​冷
· 记得当年读又见棕榈--悼念作家於
· 六四改变了我们的人生轨迹
· 迟到了四十年的汇报—寻找庄家玫
· 琼瑶最新文章【再寫《握三下,我
【上海味道】
· 《我的前半生》你怎成了虹口宣传
· 在我们生长的街区寻觅光阴旧迹-
· 幻梦般的悠扬:父亲湮埋70年的《
· 留住心中上海的味道
· 其实,上海人是作风剽悍的一个族
· 上海市民圣诞夜排队4小时只为进
· 记上海滩最后的老克勒 zt
· 功德无量的奇迹:徐平羽在上海外
【家史亲友】
· 我姐家人染疫的经历--兼评网友“
· 闲聊并澄清有关杨委员和上外附中
· 周末闲聊学诗词:1.启蒙人-笃信基
· 母亲百年冥诞日的思念和追忆(下)
· 母亲百年冥诞日的思念和追忆(中
· 母亲百年冥诞日的思念和追忆(上
· 二姐上海买房记|港与北上广深高
· 父亲去世二十年后父亲节的怀念-
· 文革中父亲被关押四年多后回家
· 逸草:父亲节里暖暖的回忆
【中外关联】
· 将停博数周/一组趣帖/普帝助川
· 越迎拜登 人山人海/俄乌战争进程
· 一组图文尽显赵国怪象 / 华为的
· 批为俄军唱赞歌女的多文被违规/
· 中歌女在乌废墟为俄军唱喀秋莎
· 内蒙铀泄露事件严重/麒麟性能只
· 日经传习大发不满/邓此举该当何
· 几条热门爆款之真假/乌候任防长
· 80年代美中蜜月旅行/华为芯片奇
· 看台陆哪方把民当人看?/日侵略过
【海外人生】
· 母亲节一笑再笑/俄乌战:德俄彻底
· 反鹅侵乌促使大多华川转变 / 乌
· 群友收集打完第二针COVID19疫苗
· 悼念新冠疫中陨落的十位世界级学
· 中国的坏老人移民美国了,但是下
· 专业行家揭露IUL骗局的根本问题
· 从两案例看IUL及卖保人常用的欺
· 解读骗局IUL-难得一见的专业保险
· 揭露华人圈里横行的老鼠会新骗局
· 第一个没有母亲的母亲节(好友文)
【教育经济科技】
· 枪杀导师,投毒邻居,留美博士怎
· 推翻平权法案不是谁输赢问题/乌
· CMU取消Legacy录取/胜利后将公开
· 看赵宇空的两面性 欲反职场多元
· 独立宣言和GCD宣言/看听唱国歌/
· 亚裔移民与非裔民权抗争/平权与
· 废平权措施对华人学生意味着什么
· 高法对大学录取用AA的裁决/拜总
· 编排ChatGPT回复成了新时尚?|人
· 过年聊轻松话题:纪念77级大学生
【育儿之道】
· 收信人去世了,聊聊那本被误读的
· 小牛娃大学申请回顾(四) 高中夏
· 十张图说出普通父母与智慧父母的
· 写在孩儿高中毕业时-粉碎恶毒诽
· 决定孩子成功的不是智商和情商,
· 小牛娃大学申请回顾(三)高中选择
· 小牛娃大学申请回顾(二)初中自推
· 小牛娃大学申请回顾(一)少儿时的
· 逸草:写在那年名校提前录取后
· 再聊美国大选与华人中的代沟
【史实真相】
· 奥本海默的疑惑:原子彈真的非丟
· 这是影射啥?/ 台海之间交流的重
· 俄罗斯从富变穷,给了中国4重大提
· 周末学史:克里米亚到底属于谁?/
· 为【文革受难者..】一书作者王友
· 那年代里拒医病人并不罕见 |方方
· 旧文-76年初的那段日子里|一件事
· 沉默的教室 影片链接 |影评:这个
· 中国豆腐渣工程巡展,超极震撼!
· 这次民间散户的爆发出乎意料 |南
【文化娱乐歌声回荡】
· 过年少添堵,多喜乐:恭贺新春!
· 分享也方便自家:【电影聚合】10
· 节日季分享:历年奥斯卡最佳电影1
· 节日听听简爱的音乐,怀念我们的
· 录一首《月圆花好》及歌曲的来历
· 周末一歌:我的《九儿》和歌词的
· 大学年代的歌:心中的玫瑰 — 逸
· 请教一下,《草原儿女爱公社》这
· 我的《呼伦贝尔大草原》
【网络轶事】
· E闻美政:六名激进民主党人的致命
· 周末一笑:川党卒蒋某是如何炼成
· 一骂二污三打滚是蒋霸自以为对付
· 斥蒋某、透视镜/gmuoruo:人岂可
· 斥蒋某、透视镜/gmuoruo:人岂可
· 某霸何以沦落成了一头自我标榜为
· 川党首气数已尽?“排山倒海”的川
· 笑看透视镜显摆己失智马屁功和阴
· 川党大选下台后,不少华裔反川群
· 欧挠头,美安心,辉瑞正式获准FDA|
【医疗健身养生养老】
· 过年聊家常:对老年管理的一些思
· 周末趣聊:延长生命的秘方|哈佛76
· 要求所有人接种疫苗天经地义-诺
· 对当今奥运会的一则一针见血的犀
· 从亲友经历深感全民医保多重要 |
· 周末闲聊健康养生:对长寿的颠覆
· 柳叶刀|哪种运动性价比最高?/我
· 如何面对老年、疾病与死亡-陈老
· 每天摄盐不能超6克?柳月刀说了,
· 看上海顶级养老院的设施/费用和
【乡土亲情】
· 数学史上的伟大母亲 /人类为什么
· 周末鸡汤:母亲的素质将决定孩子
· 老底子上海人怎么过中秋?zt (
【世界各地】
· 将停博数周/一组趣帖/普帝助川
· 金家奢华绿皮列车揭密/9.13俄乌
· 毛党文化之害空前绝后/毛的力量
· 宝像雄文 何其眼熟?/苏梅战役:40
· 911,永恒的纪念/乌发布反攻成果
· 带鱼被送带鱼/美越联合声明全文
· 越迎拜登 人山人海/俄乌战争进程
· 秦剧出新幕-罪名升级/俄曾严重渗
· 日经传习大发不满/邓此举该当何
· 几条热门爆款之真假/乌候任防长
【母校风华】
· 上海交大打造日本战犯审判文献数
· 2016年为国出征里约奥运会的交大
存档目录
2023-09-01 - 2023-09-13
2023-08-01 - 2023-08-31
2023-07-01 - 2023-07-31
2023-06-01 - 2023-06-30
2023-05-01 - 2023-05-31
2023-04-01 - 2023-04-30
2023-03-01 - 2023-03-31
2023-02-13 - 2023-02-27
2022-08-01 - 2022-08-04
2022-07-01 - 2022-07-31
2022-06-01 - 2022-06-30
2022-05-01 - 2022-05-31
2022-04-01 - 2022-04-30
2022-03-01 - 2022-03-31
2022-02-02 - 2022-02-28
2022-01-01 - 2022-01-31
2021-12-01 - 2021-12-31
2021-11-01 - 2021-11-30
2021-10-01 - 2021-10-31
2021-09-01 - 2021-09-30
2021-08-01 - 2021-08-31
2021-07-01 - 2021-07-31
2021-06-01 - 2021-06-30
2021-05-01 - 2021-05-31
2021-04-01 - 2021-04-30
2021-03-01 - 2021-03-31
2021-02-01 - 2021-02-28
2021-01-01 - 2021-01-31
2020-12-01 - 2020-12-31
2020-11-01 - 2020-11-30
2020-10-01 - 2020-10-31
2020-09-01 - 2020-09-30
2020-08-01 - 2020-08-31
2020-07-01 - 2020-07-31
2020-06-01 - 2020-06-30
2020-05-01 - 2020-05-31
2020-04-01 - 2020-04-30
2020-03-01 - 2020-03-31
2020-02-01 - 2020-02-29
2020-01-01 - 2020-01-31
2019-12-01 - 2019-12-31
2019-11-07 - 2019-11-30
2019-10-01 - 2019-10-15
2019-09-01 - 2019-09-30
2019-08-01 - 2019-08-30
2019-07-01 - 2019-07-31
2019-06-01 - 2019-06-30
2019-05-03 - 2019-05-31
2017-11-01 - 2017-11-23
2017-10-01 - 2017-10-31
2017-09-01 - 2017-09-30
2017-08-01 - 2017-08-31
2017-07-01 - 2017-07-31
2017-06-01 - 2017-06-30
2017-05-01 - 2017-05-31
2017-04-01 - 2017-04-30
2017-03-01 - 2017-03-31
2017-02-01 - 2017-02-28
2017-01-02 - 2017-01-31
2016-12-01 - 2016-12-31
2016-11-01 - 2016-11-30
2016-10-01 - 2016-10-31
2016-09-01 - 2016-09-30
2016-08-01 - 2016-08-31
 
关于本站 | 广告服务 | 联系我们 | 招聘信息 | 网站导航 | 隐私保护
Copyright (C) 1998-2024. CyberMedia Network /Creaders.NET. All Rights Reserved.