Why Coach Is
A Good Long-Term Investment
Dec 4 2013, 13:58 Jay Zollas
Years ago, I created
a wish list of stocks that I''d love to own. In order to make it onto this list,
I established rigorous requirements for entry:
-
Upward trend in
sales, operating income, net income, EPS, and book value for the past 10 years
-
High return on book value/shareholder''s equity
-
Consistent high margins (gross, operating, and net income)
-
Decreasing number of outstanding shares
-
Less than 5 times annual net earnings in long-term debt
-
Sustainable dividend payout ratio (less than 60%)
Not surprisingly,
the majority of companies that made it onto my list were brand names that I
recognized--companies that were leaders in their respective industries, and
that possess a durable competitive advantage. Their stocks are generally
expensive, historically trend perpetually higher, and rarely present a decent
buying opportunity. Recently, one such company on my list has finally faced a
temporary challenge that has caused its stock to be priced below its intrinsic
value: Coach, Inc. (COH).
Company Description
Coach is an American
luxury design company that offers a multitude of products, including women''s handbags,
small leather goods, men''s and women''s bags, footwear, sunwear, fragrances, and
other accessories. Coach owns and operates full-priced retail and outlet store
locations internationally, and utilizes distributors to help expand their brand
presence around the globe. Coach also runs e-commerce websites in over 24
countries.
BuyingOpportunityFor Coach,
Inc.
Shares of Coach have
lagged the broader market over the past year. The primary reasons for this
include 1) increased competition in the women''s handbag market, 2) a slight
decrease in sales in Coach''s North American business (which consists of 68% of
net sales), 3) Coach''s transformation into a global lifestyle brand, and 4) a
major change in Coach''s executive/creative management.
However, Coach has a
number of strengths that offset these risks: 1) a strong brand, 2) growth
opportunities in their men''s business, international expansion, and their
strategy of growing into a global lifestyle brand, 3) solid financial strength,
and 4) low business valuation compared with the company''s average P/E ratio for
the past 10 years, and compared to the average current P/E ratio of other
luxury goods companies. The problems plaguing Coach today are temporary in
nature, and have caused its shares to be priced at an attractive valuation for
a potentially lucrative long-term investment.
Competition (And Other Threats)
Michael Kors (KORS) is considered to be Coach''s biggest threat, and is also
one of the primary reason for Coach''s lagging stock price. While Coach''s North
American sales have declined 1% with a same-store sales decrease of 6.8% during
the past quarter, Kors'' parallel sales in the same market increased 31% with a
same-store sales increase of 21%. This wouldn''t be such a big deal if Kors was
just some company making a few million dollars in annual sales. On the
contrary, Kors reported net sales of $2.18 Billion on March of 2013 compared
with Coach''s reported net sales of $5.08 Billion on June of 2013. At just less
than half of Coach''s net sales, growth of total revenue in the ~30% arena is
very threatening to Coach''s leading market position.
In addition to the
numbers listed above, another reason why Coach''s stock is struggling is due to
management''s plan to transform the business from an international accessories
business into a global lifestyle brand anchored in accessories. Major changes
in a company''s business should be a cause for concern. In this case, it appears
as though Coach, the market leader in women''s leather handbags, is following
Kors'' strategy in becoming a global lifestyle brand. Does this mean that Coach
is running out of ideas on how to steer their company into the future? While
Coach is starting to follow in Michael Kors'' footsteps rather than carving out
a unique path for other competitors to take note of, I''ll explain how this
strategy actually makes good sense in the "Strengths and
Opportunities" section below.
The other threat to
Coach''s business is the drastic change in their executive management team.
Generally, one change to a company''s executive management is no cause for
concern. However, almost half of Coach''s management is changing. North American
Group President Mike Tucci and Chief Operating Officer Jerry Stritzke left the
company in August of 2013. Chief Executive Officer Lew Frankfort is retiring in
January of 2014, to be replaced by current President and Chief Commercial
Officer Victor Luis. And Executive Creative Director Reed Krakoff has decided
to leave Coach to lead his own brand independently. Coach''s new Chief Creative
Director will be Stuart Vevers, who has a long history of fashion innovation
and success at such companies as Calvin Klein, Bottega Veneta, Givenchy, Louis
Vuitton, Mulberry, and Loewe. All in all, while there are many changes
occurring in Coach''s executive management team, the new successors are all very
well-equipped to lead Coach into their next phase of growth as a global
lifestyle brand--and Vevers might just be the breath of fresh design innovation
that Coach needs to help turn around their struggling North American women''s
handbag business.
Strengths and Opportunities
Coach has a very
strong and recognizable brand. The very word "coach" itself conjures
up images of luxury handbags due to the pervasiveness of the company''s global
and cultural reach. Fashion can be a very fickle industry, yet Coach has been
in business as a luxury goods company for 72 years. Over the years, Coach has
survived through changes in management, recessions, and competitive threats.
Perhaps most interesting of all, the Coach brand has evolved through numerous
phases of growth throughout its history; and we are all witnessing yet another
new phase of growth that is about to be underway in the form of a new CEO,
Executive Creative Director, and as a global lifestyle brand.
Just at a time when
Coach''s North American women''s handbag business is struggling, Coach is going
through a lot of changes, most of which can be viewed as opportunities. To
start with, having a new creative director at the helm responsible for
sprinkling new magic into the company''s products should be enough fuel to spark
new demand and life into their North American market. International sales are
growing at a double digit pace--China''s
sales numbers alone grew 35% during this past quarter. Coach''s men''s bags and
accessories business grew 25% this past quarter, and management expects annual
sales to reach $700 Million in 2014 and is projecting sales of $1 Billion
within three years. In addition to the above-mentioned results and future
expectations, Coach is beginning to place more emphasis on its line of
accessories as part of its revamped strategy toward becoming a global lifestyle
brand, including footwear, sunwear, clothing, fragrance. They are also planning
on expanding further into under-penetrated international markets, most notably
in Asia andEurope. All these factors will
help Coach''s North American business to stabilize and continue to grow again,
and to help grow total sales.
While changes to any
company''s business introduces an air of uncertainty toward the future, and
investors do not like uncertainty and change, one should always consult where a
company has been as a helpful indication of where it might go. Obviously, while
past results cannot be relied on to predict future performance, analyzing
management''s performance in the past can be a helpful exercise to see what
might be in store for a company moving forward into the future. The great news
is that Coach''s fundamental financials are some of the strongest that I''ve seen
of any company that I''ve analyzed.
Financial Strength
One of the first
things I do when investigating a company is to dig into their financials. I
simply go down the checklist of criteria that I''ve established for potential companies
to enter my "Dream List of Acquisitions." I will now analyze Coach
using these same criteria.
Upward Trend in Earnings
Year
|
Sales
|
Op Income
|
Net Income
|
EPS
|
BVS
|
2013
|
$5.08 Bil
|
$1.52 Bil
|
$1.03 Bil
|
3.61
|
8.55
|
2012
|
$4.76 Bil
|
$1.51 Bil
|
$1.04 Bil
|
3.53
|
6.99
|
2011
|
$4.16 Bil
|
$1.30 Bil
|
$880.80 Mil
|
2.92
|
5.49
|
2010
|
$3.61 Bil
|
$1.15 Bil
|
$734.94 Mil
|
2.33
|
4.93
|
2009
|
$3.23 Bil
|
$977.08 Mil
|
$623.37 Mil
|
1.91
|
5.33
|
2008
|
$3.18 Bil
|
$1.19 Bil
|
$783.06 Mil
|
2.17
|
4.37
|
2007
|
$2.61 Bil
|
$1.03 Bil
|
$663.67 Mil
|
1.69
|
5.12
|
2006
|
$2.11 Bil
|
$797.23 Mil
|
$494.28 Mil
|
1.27
|
3.09
|
2005
|
$1.71 Bil
|
$637.57 Mil
|
$388.65 Mil
|
1.00
|
2.80
|
2004
|
$1.32 Bil
|
$447.66 Mil
|
$261.75 Mil
|
0.68
|
2.08
|
The numbers in all 5
categories increased steadily for the past 10 years. Even during the Great
Recession in 2009, while sales were up, the decline in Operating Income, Net
Income, and EPS were minimal, which speaks volumes about the strength of the
Coach brand.
Consistent High Return on Book Value/Equity
(>12%)
Year
|
EPS
|
BVS
|
ROE
|
2013
|
3.61
|
8.55
|
42%
|
2012
|
3.53
|
6.99
|
51%
|
2011
|
2.92
|
5.49
|
53%
|
2010
|
2.33
|
4.93
|
47%
|
2009
|
1.91
|
5.33
|
36%
|
2008
|
2.17
|
4.37
|
50%
|
2007
|
1.69
|
5.12
|
33%
|
2006
|
1.27
|
3.09
|
41%
|
2005
|
1.00
|
2.80
|
36%
|
2004
|
0.68
|
2.08
|
33%
|
The average company
in the S&P 500 has a return on equity of about 12%. For the past 10 years,
Coach has averaged a 42.2% return on equity, which is way above average.
Decreasing Shares Outstanding
Year
|
Net Income
|
EPS
|
Shares Outstanding
|
2013
|
$1.03 Bil
|
3.61
|
281.90 Mil
|
2012
|
$1.04 Bil
|
3.53
|
285.12 Mil
|
2011
|
$880.80 Mil
|
2.92
|
288.51 Mil
|
2010
|
$734.94 Mil
|
2.33
|
296.87 Mil
|
2009
|
$623.37 Mil
|
1.91
|
318.01 Mil
|
2008
|
$783.06 Mil
|
2.17
|
336.73 Mil
|
2007
|
$663.67 Mil
|
1.69
|
373.09 Mil
|
2006
|
$494.28 Mil
|
1.27
|
365.86 Mil
|
2005
|
$388.65 Mil
|
1.00
|
377.12 Mil
|
2004
|
$261.75 Mil
|
0.68
|
376.37 Mil
|
In addition to
dividends, another great way for a company to return cash to shareholders is
through share buybacks. The great thing about share buybacks is that investors
own a larger piece of the company, and there are no tax consequences. Buybacks
are also evidence that a company possesses great financial strength. Starting
from 2007, Coach''s outstanding shares went from 373.09 million to 281.90
million, a 25% decrease in 7 years.
Consistent High Margins
Year
|
Gross Margin
|
Operating Income Margin
|
Net Income Margin
|
2013
|
72.9%
|
29.9%
|
20.3%
|
2012
|
72.8%
|
31.7%
|
21.8%
|
2011
|
72.7%
|
31.3%
|
21.2%
|
2010
|
72.9%
|
31.9%
|
20.3%
|
2009
|
71.9%
|
30.2%
|
19.3%
|
2008
|
75.7%
|
37.4%
|
24.6%
|
2007
|
77.4%
|
39.5%
|
25.4%
|
2006
|
77.7%
|
37.7%
|
23.4%
|
2005
|
76.7%
|
37.3%
|
22.7%
|
2004
|
74.9%
|
33.9%
|
19.7%
|
Companies that earn
a gross margin greater than 40%, and earn a net income margin greater than 20%
display the financial strength of a company that possesses a durable
competitive advantage. For the past 10 years, Coach has averaged a 74.6% gross
profit margin, and has averaged a 21.9% net income margin. More importantly,
the consistency of these high margins is incredible.
Long-Term Debt < 5X Annual Net Income
Year
|
Net Income
|
Long-Term Debt
|
2013
|
$1.03 Bil
|
$485,000
|
2012
|
$1.04 Bil
|
$985,000
|
2011
|
$880.80 Mil
|
$23.36 Mil
|
2010
|
$734.94 Mil
|
$24.16 Mil
|
2009
|
$623.37 Mil
|
$25.07 Mil
|
2008
|
$783.06 Mil
|
$2.58 Mil
|
2007
|
$663.67 Mil
|
$2.87 Mil
|
2006
|
$494.28 Mil
|
$3.10 Mil
|
2005
|
$388.65 Mil
|
$3.27 Mil
|
2004
|
$261.75 Mil
|
$3.42 Mil
|
Coach has carried
practically no debt during the past 10 years, which means that the cash
generated from organic operations is sufficient for continuing the business
(and, in Coach''s case, also sufficient for returning cash to shareholders
through an increasing dividend and share buybacks).
Sustainable Dividend Payout Ratio < 60%
Year
|
EPS
|
Dividend
|
Payout Ratio
|
2013
|
3.61
|
1.24
|
34%
|
2012
|
3.53
|
0.98
|
28%
|
2011
|
2.92
|
0.68
|
23%
|
2010
|
2.33
|
0.38
|
16%
|
2009
|
1.91
|
0.08
|
4%
|
2008
|
2.17
|
-
|
-
|
2007
|
1.69
|
-
|
-
|
2006
|
1.27
|
-
|
-
|
2005
|
1.00
|
-
|
-
|
2004
|
0.68
|
-
|
-
|
Coach started paying
a dividend to shareholders beginning in 2009, and has rapidly increased the
payout over the past 5 years. With the financial strength displayed by Coach,
and with a 34% dividend payout ratio, it appears that the dividend rate is very
safe and has the potential to continue increasing at a quicker rate than
earnings for the next few years before stabilizing to be more in line with the
growth rate of earnings.
Altogether, it is
very evident that Coach more than likely possesses a durable competitive
advantage based on their fundamental financial performance over the past 10
years. Having a longer-term perspective on the company''s performance, or seeing
how the executive management team has guided the company over a 10-year period,
should give investors solace that fiscal 2013''s weaker-than-average performance
for Coach truly is, as management has mentioned numerous times, an
"investment year" for the company, and that future performance
starting with 2014 and 2015 should begin to show improvements as the company
transitions into its next phase of growth as a global lifestyle brand.
Attractive Valuation
There are a few
methods that I use for measuring the quality of a company''s current valuation:
1) company''s average P/E ratio for the past 10 years, 2) comparison of P/E
ratios between competitors within the same industry, and 3) taking into
consideration the relatively risk-free 10-year treasury bond yield against a
conservative projection of the company''s growth prospects into the future
(based on past performance).
Company''s Average P/E Ratio For The Past 10
Years
Year
|
P/E Ratio
|
2013
|
16
|
2012
|
17
|
2011
|
22
|
2010
|
16
|
2009
|
14
|
2008
|
13
|
2007
|
28
|
2006
|
23
|
2005
|
34
|
2004
|
33
|
The numbers listed
in the above chart are rounded to the nearest whole number, and are
approximate. Based on this information, the average P/E ratio for Coach''s stock
has been about 21.6 over the past 10 years. The highs and lows indicate that
the stock''s value has fluctuated widely. However, it wasn''t until during the
Great Recession when the stock took a big hit and started trading in the low to
mid teens--plus, the challenges of the company during the past year or two are
indicative of the most recent low P/E ratios.
Current P/E Ratios of Relevant Companies
Company
|
Current P/E Ratio
|
Coach Inc.
|
16
|
Michael Kors Holding Ltd.
|
33
|
Ralph Lauren Corp. (RL)
|
22
|
Tiffany & Co. (TIF)
|
26
|
L Brands Inc. (LTD)
|
23
|
Fossil Group Inc. (FOSL)
|
20
|
Nike Inc. (NKE)
|
27
|
The average current
P/E ratio of all the companies listed in the above table (excluding Coach) is
25.1. Michael Kors, Coach''s primary competitor, is trading at a P/E ratio of
33, roughly double that of Coach''s valuation. While Kors'' lofty valuation is
more justified due to the company''s rapid growth during the past few years,
even the more mature companies with growth closer to "average" are
valued above a P/E ratio of 20. Taking this factor alone into consideration,
Coach has a potential "catch-up effect" of approximately 25%
(4+16=20, and 4/16=25%) if its stock were to gravitate closer to its industry
peer average.
Company''s Future Prospects Vs. 10-Year Treasuries
Interest rates are
still being held back due to the Fed''s QE program. Currently, the 10-Year
Treasury Notes are yielding about 2.75%. In this environment, most stocks of
reputable companies with healthy earnings and balance sheets would be
preferable for investment over the relatively risk-free treasuries. However, I
would begin feeling nervous if a stock''s P/E ratio was nearing the upper
thirties, since a company''s earnings at that level are worth roughly the same
as treasuries. For example, an investment into a company whose current annual
earnings are valued at a P/E ratio of 40 would be worth 2.5% (1/40=2.5%).
Coach''s current dividend yield alone is 2.5%, which is almost equivalent to the
10-year treasury yield.
If an investor owned
100% of Coach, their before-tax return would be close to 30%--fiscal 2013
pretax earnings of $1.524 Billion divided into gross sales of $5.075 Billion is
equal to 29.9%.
A potential investor
of Coach today, with shares trading at a P/E ratio of about 16, would start off
their investment earning about a 9.6% pretax return (6.25% after-tax return
considering 35% taxes).
Since Coach
evidently has a durable competitive advantage, one could argue that the company
will continue to increase their earnings well into the future for many years to
come. Their EPS growth rate over the past 5 years has slowed considerably, yet
still clocks in at about 10.5% per year. Let''s see what Coach''s EPS could look
like 10 years into the future using this growth rate.
Future EPS At 10.5% Average Annual Growth
Year
|
Future EPS
|
2023
|
9.80
|
2022
|
8.87
|
2021
|
8.02
|
2020
|
7.26
|
2019
|
6.57
|
2018
|
5.95
|
2017
|
5.38
|
2016
|
4.87
|
2015
|
4.41
|
2014
|
3.99
|
2013
|
3.61
|
Let''s say that an
investor purchased shares of Coach today with EPS of $3.61, at a P/E ratio of
16 (around $55.00/share), and held onto their shares until the year 2023. Let''s
assume that Coach''s earnings were in fact $9.80/share during 2023. If Coach''s
P/E ratio was still 16 in 2023, then its share price would end up being
$156.80/share, and the investor would have earned a 10.5% average annual return
on their investment, which isn''t bad at all. But let''s say that we were in the
middle of a roaring bull market: Coach''s business was performing wonderfully, and
the market was pricing its shares at a modest P/E ratio of 23 (which is
slightly above its average P/E ratio during the past 10 years, and slightly
below where its peers are valued today). With EPS of $9.80, and a P/E ratio of
23, COH shares would be trading at $225.00/share. In this instance, an investor
would have earned an average annual return of closer to 15%, which is
definitely above average compared with the long-term performance of the S&P
500 index.
The best part of the
above visualization into the future is that, so long as Coach truly does posses
a durable competitive advantage, and they continue to increase their EPS at an
average annual return of approximately 10.5% per year, then the above scenario
could potentially play out. Granted, if the economy was in a recession 10 years
from now, Coach''s P/E ratio could be in the single digits. But in the end, a
company''s earnings power truly is the single most important factor when
considering executing an investment.
Conclusion
After analyzing
their financials over the past 10-year period, it is evident that Coach
possesses a durable competitive advantage. This assumption should give
investors comfort knowing that the current pessimism in the market price of
Coach''s shares due to the increase in competition, executive leadership change,
and struggling North American women''s handbag sales is temporary in nature. As
soon as the transition into a global lifestyle brand materializes, fresher and
innovative product designs from Stuart Vevers begin hitting shelves, and North
American sales stabilize, (and after this happens, the media should begin to
focus on the more positive attributes of Coach''s business again, such as their
international expansion, and their growing men''s business,) there could be a
correction in the market valuation of Coach''s shares to the upside of
approximately 25%. And for the patient long-term investor, at Coach''s current
valuation, there is the potential for market-beating returns to the tune of
around 15% per annum over the next 10 years.
Michael
Kors: A Few Reasons Why I''m Staying Long On This Luxury Retail Play
Nov 22 2013, Heather Ingrasso
On
Wednesday, November 20, a survey from Wedbush estimated which retail
chains might have an edge over their respected peers during the 2013 holiday
shopping season. Although the list included names such as Pier 1 (PIR) (in the retail hard-lines segment) and Gap (GPS) (in the specialty retail segment), I actually
wanted to highlight a number of reasons why I''m staying long on the one company
that is expected to standout within the Footwear, Apparel and Accessories
category, and that company happens to be none other than, Michael Kors (KORS).
Recent Performance & Trend Behavior
On Wednesday, shares of KORS, which
currently possess a market cap of $15.91 billion, a P/E ratio of 35.31, a
forward P/E ratio of 22.77, and a profit margin of 18.90%, settled at a price
of $79.09/share. Based on their closing price of $79.09/share, shares of KORS
are trading 0.33% above their 20-day simple moving average, 3.62% above their
50-day simple moving average, and 21.08% above their 200-day simple moving
average. These numbers indicate a short-term, mid-term and long-term uptrend
for the stock which generally translates into a moderate buying mode for most
near-term traders and long-term investors.
Recapping Michael Kors FQ2 Performance
On Tuesday, November 5, Michael Kors
reported EPS of $0.71/share and revenue of $740.3 million for its FQ2. These
results had surpassed both analysts'' EPS estimates by a margin of $0.02/share
and revenue estimates by a margin of $18.1 million. Some of the more positive
notes to come out of the company''s earnings announcement included but were not
limited to a 23% increase in comparable store sales and a 31% increase in North
American sales.
If the company can demonstrate a
considerable increase (approximately 5% to 8%) in both North American and
European sales as well as an increase in comparable store sales (approximately
2.5% to 3.5%) over the next 12-24 months, I see no reason why the company
wouldn''t meet or slightly surpass analysts'' expectations for both FQ3
(estimates are calling for Michael Kors to earn $0.86/share on revenue of just
over $858 million) and FY13 (estimates are calling for Michael Kors to earn
$2.83/share on revenue of just over $3 billion).
Risk Factors
According
to Michael Kors'' most recent 10-K,
there are a number of risk factors all investors should consider. These factors
include but are not limited to the fact that the accessories, footwear and
apparel industries are heavily influenced by general macroeconomic cycles that
affect consumer spending, and a prolonged period of depressed consumer spending
could have a material adverse effect on the company''s business, financial
condition and operating results and the fact that the markets in which the
company operates are highly competitive, both within North America and
internationally, and any increased competition based on a number of factors
could cause our profitability to decline.
Conclusion
For those of you who may be considering a
position in Michael Kors, I''d keep a watchful eye on a number of catalysts over
the next 12-24 months as each could play a role in the company''s long-term
growth. For example, near-term investors should focus on the company''s recent
performance and trend behavior, while longer-term investors should pay close
attention to the company''s same-store sales growth, upcoming earnings
performance and demand for its wide range of products and services during the
upcoming holiday season.
|