很多人基于华尔街的推荐购买和卖出股票。人们对于华尔街的信任,本能的是基于对于美国金融界敬业精神的“崇拜”。那么,现实下的华尔街到底是个什么样子呢?
如果你稍微注意一下,你就会发现,你被推荐购买的机会,远比你被推荐卖出的机会要大的多。对于黑莓手机生产商,人们做出了稍微细致一点的分析,对于我们普通的投资者颇有价值思索一番。
常言说:购买容易,卖出时机把握困难。造成这一结局的,恐怕也在一定程度上和华尔街的误导有关。
要想成为股市里的常胜将军,恐怕是不可以依赖与华尔街的推荐可以做到的。
Why Wall Street couldn't
say 'sell' on BlackBerry
12:03 PM ET 9/24/13
ReutersBlackBerry Z10 devices. CHAPEL HILL, N.C. (MarketWatch)
-- Blackberry Ltd.'s recent ratings from Wall Street analysts are a perfect
illustration of how hard it is for analysts to say "sell."
Until Monday's apparent bitter end, when the company announced a deal to go
private at $9 a share, the worst that the average analyst could bring himself
to say is that Blackberry was a "hold."
For example, Zacks Investment Research, which calculates a rating based on
analyst earnings estimates revisions, was still rating the stock a solid "hold"
when the company announced its go-private deal on Monday. That, despite the
intense Blackberry death watch that had been going on for several days, in
which the stock had fallen some 25%.
In fact, on Zacks' five-point scale, with "1" denoting a strong buy
and "5" a strong sell, BlackBerry's BBRY) consensus rating Monday afternoon was 3.68.
That's only 7 basis points lower than where it stood three months ago.
It wasn't supposed to be this way.
Many thought that Wall Street's bias towards buying over selling ended a decade
ago. That's when the SEC reached an agreement with 10 large Wall Street firms
to address the conflicts of interest that previously led them to issue tainted
research about individual stocks -- especially during the Internet boom of the
late 1990s. In addition to paying a collective $1.4 billion in fines, the firms
also agreed to sever their stock market research operations from their investment
banking divisions.
Whatever else you might say about that agreement, it clearly hasn't had much
overall impact on Wall Street ratings skewing towards the buy side.
Consider the breakdown of buy-hold-sell ratings for companies in the S&P
500 index SPX) ,
courtesy of data provided by Sam Stovall, Chief Equity Strategist at S&P
Capital IQ. The data encompasses the more than 11,000 individual buy-hold-sell
ratings that S&P has gathered from Wall Street analysts for the companies
in that index.
% of all ratings in this categoryStrong Buy30.2%Buy17.8%Hold45.5%Weak
Hold4.3%Sell2.2%
Notice that just 2.2% of the ratings are in the
"sell" category, and just 4.3% more are rated a "weak
hold." In other words, 93.5% of the ratings are "hold" or
higher.
To use an overworked, but nevertheless apt analogy: It's as though Wall Street
has decided that publicly traded companies are like the kids of Lake Woebegone,
all of whom are above average.
A different perspective that reaches the same overall conclusion comes from
focusing on each of the 500 stock's consensus rating, which S&P Capital IQ
calculates by averaging all the individual analyst ratings for that particular
stock. The lowest consensus rating for any stock right now is 2.67 on a 1-to-5
scale with 5 denoting a "strong buy" and "1" a sell --
which still puts this lowest-rated stock in the "hold" category.
The bottom line? Don't count on Wall Street to tell you when to sell. If you
insist on following Wall Street's lead, you probably should interpret
"hold" as "sell."
Three ways
BlackBerry went wrong
11:00 AM ET
9/24/13
SAN
FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) -- For BlackBerry Ltd., the fall from grace
has been epic.
The Canadian-based smartphone pioneer appears to have finally found a savior,
and, if all the details are worked out, the company will go private in a deal
led by its largest shareholder, Fairfax Financial, valued at $4.7 billion, or
$9 a share, in November.
Though a nice upside for a stock that got pummeled by last week's whopper of an
earnings warning, it's a huge comedown from BlackBerry's BBRY)former
status as a company that was revered for its secure network and high-quality
handsets. The deal price is less than one-quarter of the market value that the
company commanded just three years ago.
BlackBerry may not be dead yet, but its drastic reversal of fortune is probably
going to make for some compelling business-school case studies. The company
will probably join the ranks of fallen tech stars like Kodak, Digital Equipment
Corp. and others who lost their leadership to nimbler rivals, whether due to
hubris, inability to change, size or all of the above.
Here are a few guesses as to what the case studies and their experts will say
about the fall of BlackBerry:
1.)The company was complacent. And its over complacency meant it failed to
see the threat posed by Apple Inc.'s AAPL) iPhone
and Google Inc.'s GOOG) Android
platform. If you have by now forgotten former co-CEO Jim Balsillie's rambling
and even incoherent comments on analyst conference calls, it is worth
revisiting some of them.
For example, when asked in June 2008, a year after the iPhone was launched,
whether his company was worried about overlap with the customer base for the
iPhone, Balsillie initially responded that the question had no relevance to the
company's way of thinking.
He went on to add: "Because once you decide to become a BlackBerry user,
you kind of stay there for life, and let's not be too penny-wise, pound-foolish
when we do get very good absolute margin."
2.) It kept its co-CEO structure in place for far too long. When
Balsillie and co-CEO Mike Lazaridis -- significantly, the largest shareholders
of what was then Research In Motion -- finally decided to step down in January
2012, they were replaced with another insider, Chief Operating Officer Thorsten
Heins, who perpetuated his predecessors' strategy, continuing development of a whole
new operating system, BlackBerry 10. Needham & Co. analyst Charlie Wolf
said at the time that the changes "appear[ed] more cosmetic than
substantive."
This is one case where it seemed obvious to outsiders that the company needed
major change, in the manner of IBM Corp.'s IBM) hiring
of Lou Gerstner as its CEO, the first CEO to come from outside the Big Blue
ranks. That move helped lead to big changes in the IBM culture and ridded it of
much of the complacency and arrogance that had taken root in its years of
industry dominance.
A further data point as an example of how arrogance has persisted at
BlackBerry: In July, despite its recent struggles, the company added a
corporate jet, albeit a 2006 Bombardier, to its fleet of corporate aircraft --
all of which are now being sold.
3.)It clung to its own proprietary technology. When the company could
easily have licensed the now-dominant Android operating system, it doubled down
on its own OS instead.
Even the troubled Nokia Corp. NOK) was
at least experimenting with Android and began to consider jumping ship to from
Windows Phone, a move that is believed to have cemented Microsoft Corp.'s MSFT) interest
in acquiring the handset business of Nokia.
BlackBerry's steadfast adherence to developing its own next-generation
operating system, BlackBerry 10, in the face of increased competition from
cheaper Android-based devices, looks increasingly like a case of reaching a
crossroads and choosing the wrong path.
BlackBerry's biggest investor, though, seems optimistic about its future. Prem
Watsa, chairman and CEO of Fairfax, which is spearheading the buyout offer and
can be characterized as a sort of Canadian version of Warren Buffett's
Berkshire Hathaway, said that going private will "open an exciting new
private chapter for BlackBerry, its customers, carriers and employees."
Watsa said BlackBerry can deliver immediate value to shareholders as it
executes its longer-term strategy as a private company.
Maybe. But as the company looks to go private and focus on a few devices for
corporate users and so-called prosumers, the outcome is anything but clear. The
sure bet is that MBA students -- alongside the Kodaks and Digital Equipments
and, yes, RIMs of future generations -- will be studying intently and trying to
learn well where, and why, the once-mighty BlackBerry went wrong.
附注:这里的很多帖子,更多的是为了自个儿欣赏。如果你喜欢来看看,我欢迎。这里无意为任何人推荐任何物件。只是一个自我学习的场所而已。一块小小的自留地而已。特此声明。
|