謝謝高伐林. I was a student in 1966, but not in Beijing, so maybe never know about the real August 5th facts. But I would like to believe 宋彬彬 did not directly beat Ms.卞仲耘. Even though we may not 只憑標籤 to judge a person, but 宋彬彬 is really a 標籤 of encouraging students to kill more teachers(8-18 is after 8-5, 卞仲耘 was already killed by "not so 彬彬" students. Mao called Cultural Revolution on purpose and authorizing to kill his comrades (if somebody thought not Mao, is somebody else might call students to teachers, please tell us who might do this?) So I already consider 宋彬彬 is a bad 標籤, just do not understand why she came to US, but not follow her father to insist Cultural Revolution in China (sure she is free to stay anywhere, do not need to say sorry)? I am a low class person, came to US mostly for economy reason (home in Shanghai was lost in 1968). but high class professor 葉維麗 (she made me believe 宋 did not beat anybody on 8-5), came to US to do research on History of CHINA, definitely not for money. As professional, did a Historical Professor really thought 宋彬彬 is not a bad 標籤 with Mao at the view of history? Does Mr.高伐林 think so also? I saw some comments, maybe not correct, say: "fight to last one in Paris Commune is a brave lady", so I will not expect this daughter of her father would feel sorry for other person's death. Anyhow, thanks to Ms.葉維麗, clear 宋, I hope every daughter is nice.
